SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Young talent compared

Créé par: TopLineTom43
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 11 nov. 2019
Publié: 11 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Best centers under 25 stats. (Best imo). Players at the bottom are In order of stats above. Just wanted to see if they are better or worse than you think. Easy to remove bias when a name isn’t attached.

Lots of people are calling out McDavid as being bad defensively



306g 139g 263a 402p
121 hits 332takeaways 246giveaways (+86 turnover ratio) +55

303 games 109g 169a 278p
156hits 169takeaways 246giveaways (-77 turnover ratio) -68 +\-


231 games 124g 106a 230points
78 hits 203 takeaways 178giveaways (+25 to ratio) +27

430 games 140g 227a 367p
195 hits 360 takeaways 243 giveaways (117 to ratio) +27

473g 164g 260a 424p
305hit 263takeaways 267 giveaways (-4 to ratio) +24
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1181 500 000 $53 933 958 $0 $107 500 $27 566 042 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
McDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
Eichel, Jack
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Matthews, Auston
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
Barkov, Aleksander
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
MacKinnon, Nathan
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
Francouz, Pavel
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
Bibeau, Antoine
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
Grubauer, Philipp
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
Exempté du ballottageWerner, Adam
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
Merzlikins, Elvis
874 125 $874 125 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
Tarasov, Daniil
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 nov. 2019 à 15 h 51
#1
wojme
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,641
Mentions "j'aime": 5,880
Take out +/-
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
11 nov. 2019 à 15 h 56
#2
TopLineTom43
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: wojme
Take out +/-


Plus minus doesn’t matter I agree. Just added it for another comparison. Most people who understand hockey know it’s a situational stat
11 nov. 2019 à 16 h 3
#3
Dan10900
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
TK:GV is not a good stat for measuring defensive ability...
11 nov. 2019 à 16 h 11
#4
TopLineTom43
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: AFOX10900
TK:GV is not a good stat for measuring defensive ability...


It’s not the best stat but it is good... most of the nhls best defensive players have a great turnover ratio. Give me an example where that’s not the case.?
11 nov. 2019 à 16 h 21
#5
Dan10900
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: TopLineTom43
It’s not the best stat but it is good... most of the nhls best defensive players have a great turnover ratio. Give me an example where that’s not the case.?


Malkin is the opposite of that case, terrible defensively, good TK:GV ratio, and take basically and DFD, they'll have a bad TK:GV ratio
11 nov. 2019 à 16 h 27
#6
TopLineTom43
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: AFOX10900
Malkin is the opposite of that case, terrible defensively, good TK:GV ratio, and take basically and DFD, they'll have a bad TK:GV ratio


Malkin is a career -62 turnover ratio? That’s not good? I think you are confused on what’s good or bad. Maybe this is why you think this is a bad for measuring skill defensively
11 nov. 2019 à 16 h 50
#7
Dan10900
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: TopLineTom43
Malkin is a career -62 turnover ratio? That’s not good? I think you are confused on what’s good or bad. Maybe this is why you think this is a bad for measuring skill defensively


Nah, I just remember arguing with someone a few weeks ago that said Malkin was good defensively bc his TK:GV ratio lmao
11 nov. 2019 à 17 h 10
#8
TopLineTom43
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: AFOX10900
Nah, I just remember arguing with someone a few weeks ago that said Malkin was good defensively bc his TK:GV ratio lmao


I mean he’s not terrible but he’s also not good. So if you told me he’s terrible defensively I’d say you’re being dramatic. But guys like Toews stone and Barkov are knows for being great defensively and all have solid turnover ratios. Like I said it’s not the best way to measure it but to completely ignore it and say it doesn’t correlate is simple not true. I’m still waiting for an example to support your initial claim. I’m assuming it doesn’t exist so good talk.
11 nov. 2019 à 20 h 57
#9
BuFfaLOFaN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
I like this list and honestly your Brave to put Eichel that high but your right he is better than the others. My one thing is Matthews might be #5 on this list.

I think that some players take longer to develop, like Eichel the player he has been in 2019-20 is better than the three below him on the list.
11 nov. 2019 à 21 h 22
#10
TopLineTom43
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
I like this list and honestly your Brave to put Eichel that high but your right he is better than the others. My one thing is Matthews might be #5 on this list.

I think that some players take longer to develop, like Eichel the player he has been in 2019-20 is better than the three below him on the list.


It wasn’t a rating list more of a guess who it is type thing
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage