SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Conner moved

Créé par: Boomer125
Équipe: 2019-20 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 6 sept. 2019
Publié: 6 sept. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
58 500 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2022
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 499 167 $0 $272 500 $2 000 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 291 667 $5 291 667 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 916 667 $2 916 667 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 280 000 $2 280 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
741 667 $741 667 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 sept. 2019 à 0 h 59
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Boomer125
I can see the league heading in a similar direction as the NBA where there is Max contracts at 5 years with a max dollar amount and there being restrictions on how many Max contracts a team can have, I can the players agreeing to a last year of contract option where either the player or the team can exercise the option but if the team uses it the player gets paid out and the AAV would be spread over the next 2 seasons, if the player chooses to exercise the option the player just walks into FA a year early with no cap penalty to the team


One max contract to a star player can transform an NBA team, just look at the raptors. The NBA is a completely different box of frogs. The max term won't change, it doesn't need to. Options I doubt will find much support from either side.

Let's use Edmonton as an example for this discussion. McDavid has 6 or 7 years left on his 8 year deal. If he had options after 3 years he could just opt out, become an FA and then leave with the franchise getting nothing for him. On the flip side, you have Lucic/Neal. Obviously the team would welcome having the option of releasing the player but do you think players would ever want the owners to have that sort of power? Lucic would have had his contract released a year ago and if he was signed in the off season who he get anything close to the 6 million a year he's going to make for the next 4 years?

The way I look at it, the owners would be against options would be bitterly against giving options to players while only star players would be in favour of options since they will always be in demand. The middle and lower classes would be against it because they are the ones who'l suffer.
7 sept. 2019 à 3 h 8
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,433
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Using Duchene as the example, why on earth would the GM and ownership want to give Duchene the option to just cancel his contract. That is what a player option is. They decline the option and are free to leave.

On the flip side, why on earth would a player sign a contract that gives his team the power to just cancel his contract if things don't go his way.

Lucic is signed for 4 more years at 6 million a season, if options where in play now, he would be dropped immediately and lose millions.

The NBA is different since they have far less players on the squad and single players make such a huge difference on teams so it can't work the same way as hockey. The NFL is also different, football players already know they only get a certain amount of guaranteed money but their contracts can be released which isn't a thing in hockey.

I am not at all freaking on this, I just enjoy discussing hockey. I hear what you are saying and there are benefits for both players and teams but negatives out way the positives


How can you say that negative out way positive want this formula haven’t been try yet. How in the world that the actual format is
The best since its the only one they tried. When contract would be negociate both side
Would be aware of the possibilities of a opt out after X number of season. Depth players wouldn’t be affect. I think that this could really help the game. First not all option in nfl, nba, mlb is use most of the time they just continue the contract, i don’t see why it would be different in nhl. If a player is happy with is situation there no reason he want out, idem for the team. Im pretty sure that if alzner had a way out of is contract he would do so, just to have another chance of playing in the big league Most Players have pride, they are athletes they want to perform, and win. I mean a guy like lucic already have earn 56 millions in is career i do think that he would survive with a opt out. This is too example one would be the team and the other the players would
Agree, the team would benefits to but alzner would have another chance of playing in nhl.
I really think that this system could work. Even if you disagree, its working in other league so it could work in nhl too. They will always be someone’s who will be against a new system or new ideas. Last time the convention wasn’t approved at a 100% by players. This is democracy and everyone has a right to choose.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage