SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trade lucic

Créé par: calgaryman
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 1 août 2019
Publié: 1 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1755 000 $
68 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Frolík, Michael
  2. Gawdin, Glenn
  3. Gillies, Jon
  4. Lucic, Milan
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Stone, Michael
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 524 337 $0 $747 500 $8 975 663 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 000 $755 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
735 000 $735 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 août 2019 à 11 h 43
#1
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Why would the Flames do that? You’re taking on 2 more years for about $2 million and a player that is 4 years older. And the extra stuff you add is worth way more than the slight negative value Frolik has.
1 août 2019 à 11 h 43
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,689
Mentions "j'aime": 12,385
The Wild haven't hired Chiarelli yet
numbah4BobbyOrr a aimé ceci.
1 août 2019 à 11 h 46
#3
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,689
Mentions "j'aime": 12,385
Quoting: EthanK24
Why would the Flames do that? You’re taking on 2 more years for about $2 million and a player that is 4 years older. And the extra stuff you add is worth way more than the slight negative value Frolik has.


Cause Parise is a top 6 winger still and Calgary is in win now mode.
1 août 2019 à 11 h 48
#4
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Cause Parise is a top 6 winger still and Calgary is in win now mode.


Even if they are, they have a young enough core to sustain this, while Parise would just shorten their window. And no matter what their situation, this is a giant overpay by the Flames.
1 août 2019 à 11 h 50
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Yeah don't see Zach Parise leaving his homestate of Minnesota for Calgary, Zero percent chance he waives his NMC for Calgary.
1 août 2019 à 11 h 56
#6
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,689
Mentions "j'aime": 12,385
Quoting: EthanK24
Even if they are, they have a young enough core to sustain this, while Parise would just shorten their window. And no matter what their situation, this is a giant overpay by the Flames.


Their prospect pool isn't impressive and Lucic is terrible, he isn't going to rebound in Calgary. Frolik is gone after this season if not sooner, Gawdin will never play in the NHL and Gillies is a 4th string goalie so 2-2nds isn't that much to sacrifice to get rid of Lucic and get Parise.
1 août 2019 à 11 h 59
#7
Biased Opinion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Buddy hasn't even unpacked yet...
1 août 2019 à 12 h 14
#8
PhoneyAnteater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 235
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Yeah don't see Zach Parise leaving his homestate of Minnesota for Calgary, Zero percent chance he waives his NMC for Calgary.


I disagree, I think Parise wants to win and he would waive it for a contender since he knows that the Wild's days of contending are over for a while.
1 août 2019 à 12 h 28
#9
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Their prospect pool isn't impressive and Lucic is terrible, he isn't going to rebound in Calgary. Frolik is gone after this season if not sooner, Gawdin will never play in the NHL and Gillies is a 4th string goalie so 2-2nds isn't that much to sacrifice to get rid of Lucic and get Parise.


The problem is the extra 2 years & $2 million. While the Flames don’t have a great prospect pool, they have a great group of young players (Valimaki, Andersson, Dube, Kylington, Tkachuk, etc.) that will be good for years to come.
1 août 2019 à 12 h 34
#10
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,689
Mentions "j'aime": 12,385
Quoting: EthanK24
The problem is the extra 2 years & $2 million. While the Flames don’t have a great prospect pool, they have a great group of young players (Valimaki, Andersson, Dube, Kylington, Tkachuk, etc.) that will be good for years to come.


Sure but they should be going for it and worry about those two years later. Yes they have a nice group of young defensemen and Tkachuk but Dube hasn't showed much yet, they really should be adding to push for a cup.
I don't think this is all that great for Minnesota but that roster is a mess over ther.
1 août 2019 à 12 h 46
#11
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Sure but they should be going for it and worry about those two years later. Yes they have a nice group of young defensemen and Tkachuk but Dube hasn't showed much yet, they really should be adding to push for a cup.
I don't think this is all that great for Minnesota but that roster is a mess over ther.


I think Calgary would rather 6 good seasons than 2 slightly better seasons, 2 good seasons, and 2 horrible seasons. (Taking into account Parise vs. Lucic’s age)
1 août 2019 à 12 h 56
#12
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,689
Mentions "j'aime": 12,385
Quoting: EthanK24
I think Calgary would rather 6 good seasons than 2 slightly better seasons, 2 good seasons, and 2 horrible seasons. (Taking into account Parise vs. Lucic’s age)


I don't know what Calgary would want but 2 good seasons, 2 okay seasons and 2 bad seasons of Parise will increase their odds of winning a cup then
4 terrible seasons of Lucic will.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage