SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade with Oilers

Créé par: Cypher
Équipe: 2019-20 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 18 juill. 2019
Publié: 18 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Avs go all in, 2 year window!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1874 125 $
79 000 000 $
1925 000 $
1710 000 $
1715 000 $
Transactions
EDM
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. Jost, Tyson
  3. Newhook, Alex [Liste de réserve]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 639 719 $0 $2 682 500 $4 860 281 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 975 000 $1 975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
874 125 $874 125 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
735 000 $735 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juill. 2019 à 21 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
thats a lot of value to give up for Players that arent even needed on the Avs. No need for Nuge who is only signed for 2 years bc you have Kadri, and Larsson isnt even an upgrade over Johnson yet you have him playing top pair with Girard?

I wouldnt give up Newhook who is going to be a stud on the Avs with his skill set. This is a very foolish trade for the Avs.
18 juill. 2019 à 21 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,616
Mentions "j'aime": 748
I am actually a huge fan of both teams so I have mixed feelings. The Oilers fan in me says yes but the Avs fan in me says no.
18 juill. 2019 à 22 h 6
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 6
As an oiler fan, yeah the Avs definitely wouldn't need to pay that much.
18 juill. 2019 à 22 h 25
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 63
Quoting: coga16
thats a lot of value to give up for Players that arent even needed on the Avs. No need for Nuge who is only signed for 2 years bc you have Kadri, and Larsson isnt even an upgrade over Johnson yet you have him playing top pair with Girard?

I wouldnt give up Newhook who is going to be a stud on the Avs with his skill set. This is a very foolish trade for the Avs.


Nuge would be ideal on the top line. He can take face-offs for Mack, and dish the puck off. That would allow Landeskog to drop down to the 2nd line, with Kadri and Compher, a pesty/agitator line that can also put up points.

Larsson is better suited to play on Girard's side than Johnson, given style of play. Larsson is also younger and Johnson's durability worries me (4 more years).

The Avs window to win is now, so sacrifice some of the future for the present.
18 juill. 2019 à 22 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Cypher
Nuge would be ideal on the top line. He can take face-offs for Mack, and dish the puck off. That would allow Landeskog to drop down to the 2nd line, with Kadri and Compher, a pesty/agitator line that can also put up points.

Larsson is better suited to play on Girard's side than Johnson, given style of play. Larsson is also younger and Johnson's durability worries me (4 more years).

The Avs window to win is now, so sacrifice some of the future for the present.


you are vastly vastly vastly over paying for complimentary players and I think you are over rating Nuges ability and I think you have Larsson confused, and he was not a very good Dman last year, even a decline EJ was better than Larsson who was constantly being caught out position having his ankles broken.
18 juill. 2019 à 23 h 50
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,673
Mentions "j'aime": 25,507
Let's assume for the moment that Larsson for Johnson is kind of a wash. That's three first-round picks for Ryan Nugent-Hopkins. Even if you now assume that Larsson is an improvement over Johnson, isn't that still an awfully high price to pay? And now that you've traded your first AND your second this year, what happens if somebody you really like comes on the market at the trade deadline?
18 juill. 2019 à 23 h 56
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 63
Quoting: coga16
you are vastly vastly vastly over paying for complimentary players and I think you are over rating Nuges ability and I think you have Larsson confused, and he was not a very good Dman last year, even a decline EJ was better than Larsson who was constantly being caught out position having his ankles broken.


A 69 point player (Nuge) isn't a complimentary player, he is a factor/corner piece. As for Larsson, everyone was bad on the Oilers last year. Larsson's first two years with Edmonton are much better and more indicative of his play.
18 juill. 2019 à 23 h 59
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 63
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Let's assume for the moment that Larsson for Johnson is kind of a wash. That's three first-round picks for Ryan Nugent-Hopkins. Even if you now assume that Larsson is an improvement over Johnson, isn't that still an awfully high price to pay? And now that you've traded your first AND your second this year, what happens if somebody you really like comes on the market at the trade deadline?


I wouldn't really call it three first round picks. Yes, Newhook is the prize for Edmonton in the trade, however Jost is bordering on bust (30-40 point player tops), and the 1st would be a late one, as the Avs should go deep in the playoffs.
19 juill. 2019 à 0 h 4
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,673
Mentions "j'aime": 25,507
Quoting: Cypher
A 69 point player (Nuge) isn't a complimentary player, he is a factor/corner piece. As for Larsson, everyone was bad on the Oilers last year. Larsson's first two years with Edmonton are much better and more indicative of his play.


The cranky old curmudgeon says Why doesn't anyone on CapFriendly know how to spell "complementary"?
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 0 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Cypher
A 69 point player (Nuge) isn't a complimentary player, he is a factor/corner piece. As for Larsson, everyone was bad on the Oilers last year. Larsson's first two years with Edmonton are much better and more indicative of his play.


A guy with 2 years left on his contract and who benefited from bloated point production being on McDavid wing isn’t a core player, that’s a rental
19 juill. 2019 à 19 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,645
Mentions "j'aime": 4,598
EDM says gimme, gimme, gimme. Avs say WTF? Hell no!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage