SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Low Risk HIgh Reward Brassard

Créé par: LukeDieHardLeaf
Équipe: 2019-20 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 16 juill. 2019
Publié: 16 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
12 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Bennett, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Neal, James
CGY
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
2.
EDM
    Future Considerations
    COL
    1. Manning, Brandon
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
    3.
    EDM
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
    2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de MIN
    2021
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $79 051 999 $0 $1 750 000 $2 448 001 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    900 000 $900 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    AD, AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    675 000 $675 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 juill. 2019 à 13 h 27
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 408
    Mentions "j'aime": 176
    900k for Brassard seems a bit low. He's likely to come in similar to the Kronwall 1 x $2.5M which you would still have room for.

    Also, I think the Flames decline using an expansion draft protection slot on Lucic and that god awful contract. As bad as Neal was last year at least he has no NMC/NTC and his contract is not buyout proof (unlike Lucic's).
    16 juill. 2019 à 13 h 50
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 21
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: CN10
    900k for Brassard seems a bit low. He's likely to come in similar to the Kronwall 1 x $2.5M which you would still have room for.

    Also, I think the Flames decline using an expansion draft protection slot on Lucic and that god awful contract. As bad as Neal was last year at least he has no NMC/NTC and his contract is not buyout proof (unlike Lucic's).


    "The clause can travel with the player even if he consents to being traded or is claimed on waivers
    This requires that the acquiring team sign an addendum to the contract ensuring that the clause does in fact travel with the player (written by the player's agent)
    If the acquiring team refuses to sign the addendum, and the player waives his clause anyway, at that point the clause may be nullified" from capfriendly's NMC faq

    So it's possible that if Lucic waives for a trade the NMC could be gone and he would not need to be protected.
    16 juill. 2019 à 13 h 51
    #3
    Dr.
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 2,506
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,438
    Quoting: CN10
    900k for Brassard seems a bit low. He's likely to come in similar to the Kronwall 1 x $2.5M which you would still have room for.

    Also, I think the Flames decline using an expansion draft protection slot on Lucic and that god awful contract. As bad as Neal was last year at least he has no NMC/NTC and his contract is not buyout proof (unlike Lucic's).


    I don't see brassard getting that anymore, i think he's going to be playing for a job at camp on a PTO.

    I think he would slot in as your third line center as well. You are asking a lot of him to come out after mcdavid and make a difference
    16 juill. 2019 à 14 h 33
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 408
    Mentions "j'aime": 176
    Quoting: Ryed
    "The clause can travel with the player even if he consents to being traded or is claimed on waivers
    This requires that the acquiring team sign an addendum to the contract ensuring that the clause does in fact travel with the player (written by the player's agent)
    If the acquiring team refuses to sign the addendum, and the player waives his clause anyway, at that point the clause may be nullified" from capfriendly's NMC faq

    So it's possible that if Lucic waives for a trade the NMC could be gone and he would not need to be protected.


    Perhaps, but it's still buyout proof and I think Neal has a better chance of bouncing back than Lucic. The Flames have no interest in being part of any deal that brings in Lucic as there's already two LW's ahead of him even if he returns to being a 20-20 guy. With Neal returning to form he's their second best RW option so the swap makes no sense.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage