SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Still Work to Be Done

Créé par: nomad
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 2 juill. 2019
Publié: 2 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 150 000 $
22 500 000 $
47 875 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Frolík, Michael
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (DET)
3.
CGY
  1. Juulsen, Noah
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
MTL
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
4.
CGY
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Stone, Michael
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de MIN
Logo de DET
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 577 141 $0 $922 500 $9 922 859 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance175 000 $$175K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
735 000 $735 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 juill. 2019 à 15 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 169
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Likely to be what the team looks like - might be bit of an overpayment on Zucker and Bennett and Rittich might get more but that looks to be the team next season
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Can someone explain the interest in Zucker?

I'm really not familiar with the Wild so I can only really look at his numbers and as far as term, AAV, and point production goes I don't really understand why him ending up on the Flames is almost a given (at least as far as this site is concerned).

Definitely not trolling either, I legitimately don't understand.
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 29
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 213
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: Treize131
Can someone explain the interest in Zucker?

I'm really not familiar with the Wild so I can only really look at his numbers and as far as term, AAV, and point production goes I don't really understand why him ending up on the Flames is almost a given (at least as far as this site is concerned).

Definitely not trolling either, I legitimately don't understand.


He is fast and skilled, and provides some great offensive upside. Defensively he is okay, but he scores well and uses his speed. Evolving Wild (https://evolving-hockey.com/) have him as the 30th most effective forward in the league over the past two years. He is quietly very good, by having some good strengths, and few weaknesses.
nomad et Treize131 a aimé ceci.
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
Flames Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Treize131
Can someone explain the interest in Zucker?

I'm really not familiar with the Wild so I can only really look at his numbers and as far as term, AAV, and point production goes I don't really understand why him ending up on the Flames is almost a given (at least as far as this site is concerned).

Definitely not trolling either, I legitimately don't understand.


Fair question, I asked it myself when I heard the rumors. After looking in to it, like @KH44 said, he is quietly a very solid player. He is fast, responsible, plays with some grit and puts up decent points (on a not so good Wild club). He is also in the right age group. His contract is a little high, but should be manageable and he is a definite upgrade on Frolik in our top 6. Can't overlook that he is available and wouldn't be too expensive. I was on the Kadri bandwagon, but now that he is gone I was looking at other rumored options (Tyler Johnson, Kreider, etc.) and I think Zucker is our best bet that is left.
Treize131 a aimé ceci.
2 juill. 2019 à 18 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Thanks @nomad and @KH44 that's helpful.

Certainly understand the appeal a lot more now.

I think I'm also looking at his salary a little differently now. With prices going up, the Hayes contract for instance, might not be too bad to have him at that AAV for 4 years.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage