SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brodie to CHI

Créé par: ItWasIn
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 12 juin 2019
Publié: 13 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
68 000 000 $
2775 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Hayden, John
  2. Saad, Brandon
Détails additionnels:
Cheaper option for CHI than Gardiner

If Brodie does not sign contract extension, CHI receives 20120 2nd round pick
2.
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $74 164 642 $0 $1 090 000 $8 835 358 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juin 2019 à 10 h 49
#1
The CEO of reported
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 386
Mentions "j'aime": 79
As a Chicago fan I love the Brodie trade. Finally, someone that isn’t an airhead
13 juin 2019 à 10 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 213
Mentions "j'aime": 36
As a Flames fan, absolutely not interested in that free second round pick we are giving away. That is a big price.
CN10 a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2019 à 10 h 55
#3
The CEO of reported
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 386
Mentions "j'aime": 79
Quoting: KH44
As a Flames fan, absolutely not interested in that free second round pick we are giving away. That is a big price.


Yea the jank trade is kinda unnecessary
CN10 a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2019 à 11 h 21
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 408
Mentions "j'aime": 176
If its a conditional pick for Brodie going UFA it should be much lower than a second. I see Brodie and Saad as almost equal in value. At worst a #3D (likely a lot of teams second best defense man) for a top 6 winger. Maybe remove the condition and just add a mid-late round pick to sweeten the deal from Chicago's perspective. I do like the idea of using Brodie for an upgrade in the top 6 though.

Why trade Jankowski when he's finally arrived as an NHL bottom 6 player for a pick who only has a small chance of making an impact during the team's window of contending? If its to get under the cap, you may as well move Czarnik who doesn't kill penalties nearly as well as Janko did last year.

Sucks to lose Bennett + Frolik, but I think Zucker would be a good fit in Calgary as the #5/6F with along with Saad. Your moves also make the keeper forwards for expansion more well defined.
13 juin 2019 à 11 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 618
Mentions "j'aime": 104
I'll be honest, I don't know enough about Saad's recent performance, but this is a really unique and original idea. Calgary could argue Brodie is better than Gardiner, while being cheaper. The parts around the edges may need to change to balance the deal, but this is intriguing.
13 juin 2019 à 11 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 618
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Quoting: RomanPolak
Yea the jank trade is kinda unnecessary


Jankowski really doesnt fit anymore. He's expensive for not really providing any on ice value. He's easy to replace, and surprisingly old for a player folks are willing to assume there is growth left.

FWIW, the Flames lowballed Jankowski on the ELC. They needed to make an offer to guarantee a compensatory 2nd rd pick should he go UFA out of college. He then had a shooting percentage burst playing with Mangiapane and Hathaway in the AHL as an old pro rookie. I think both of those players provide more at the NHL level.
13 juin 2019 à 11 h 30
#7
Démarrer sujet
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,546
Mentions "j'aime": 2,068
Quoting: RomanPolak
Yea the jank trade is kinda unnecessary


Quoting: CN10

Why trade Jankowski when he's finally arrived as an NHL bottom 6 player for a pick who only has a small chance of making an impact during the team's window of contending? If its to get under the cap, you may as well move Czarnik who doesn't kill penalties nearly as well as Janko did last year.


Count me as someone who isn't a Jankowski fan. Doesn't use his size well, can't drive play or distribute too well, not particularly fast. There are stretches were I honestly think he's lucky to be an NHLer. Reminds me of Colborne.

Now with all I said I think this is a time where you can move him as he has fairly decent counting numbers. 5 shorties, could interest a team
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage