SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

perry for oko

Créé par: jonnymc26
Équipe: 2019-20 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2019
Publié: 10 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
half the term and points of oko. bufff will need cap space sooner than ana at current rate of spending
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
43 000 000 $
43 000 000 $
31 000 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de BUF
Logo de STL
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de BUF
2020
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de DAL
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de STL
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $64 497 500 $0 $7 282 500 $18 502 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 387 500 $3 387 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
812 500 $812 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juin 2019 à 21 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
LOL. The Ducks aren’t taking the longer contract AND giving up a good prospect.
10 juin 2019 à 21 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,891
Mentions "j'aime": 14,577
Wow, one of the worst trades I've ever seen on here. Anaheim dies of laughter
10 juin 2019 à 23 h 46
#3
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
LOL. The Ducks aren’t taking the longer contract AND giving up a good prospect.
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Wow, one of the worst trades I've ever seen on here. Anaheim dies of laughter


your not a prospect at 22. buffalo gives up 47 points to ana s loss of 15 points and saves them over 2m$. so you dont know what your talking about. if ana is thinking of buying out perry witch is all over the news, it will cost them about 4.1m$ for next 4 years regardless. at least with this trade they get some players for that wasted cap space.
11 juin 2019 à 2 h 16
#4
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
your not a prospect at 22. buffalo gives up 47 points to ana s loss of 15 points and saves them over 2m$. so you dont know what your talking about. if ana is thinking of buying out perry witch is all over the news, it will cost them about 4.1m$ for next 4 years regardless. at least with this trade they get some players for that wasted cap space.


This is bad. The ducks want the roster spot not that cap room. They aren’t in cap trouble. Also Perry has 49 points 2 seasons ago when he played the full season. Okposo hasn’t hit 49 points since he joined BUF. He also has his own injury concerns. If there’s any player/pick with value going anywhere in this deal it’s going to the ducks.
13 juin 2019 à 18 h 15
#5
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
This is bad. The ducks want the roster spot not that cap room. They aren’t in cap trouble. Also Perry has 49 points 2 seasons ago when he played the full season. Okposo hasn’t hit 49 points since he joined BUF. He also has his own injury concerns. If there’s any player/pick with value going anywhere in this deal it’s going to the ducks.


i dont think thats true at all about roster spots. if they needed that they could just put perry in AHL and you would be good. brass in duck land do not want perry on team period, to the point they talk about buyouts. even as small a gain as it is this could very well be better then what ducks actually get back for him.
13 juin 2019 à 19 h 44
#6
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
i dont think thats true at all about roster spots. if they needed that they could just put perry in AHL and you would be good. brass in duck land do not want perry on team period, to the point they talk about buyouts. even as small a gain as it is this could very well be better then what ducks actually get back for him.


He has a NMC that means he can not be put on waivers. He can’t go to the minors.

Okposo has a contract twice as long as Perry’s and Zemgus has to be signed so in all the ducks clog the roster more and don’t get any cap relief but get put on the hook for 6M for 2 extra years.
13 juin 2019 à 21 h 54
#7
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
He has a NMC that means he can not be put on waivers. He can’t go to the minors.

Okposo has a contract twice as long as Perry’s and Zemgus has to be signed so in all the ducks clog the roster more and don’t get any cap relief but get put on the hook for 6M for 2 extra years.


i still dont see the need to bring up players ducks arnt a deep team on forwards and can surly just drop a bottom 6 guy like GRANT, ROWNEY or SHORE
13 juin 2019 à 22 h 18
#8
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
i still dont see the need to bring up players ducks arnt a deep team on forwards and can surly just drop a bottom 6 guy like GRANT, ROWNEY or SHORE


So make a bad trade and just dump guys for the hell of it?
13 juin 2019 à 23 h 21
#9
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
So make a bad trade and just dump guys for the hell of it?


umm to hugely upgrade your bottom six
13 juin 2019 à 23 h 43
#10
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
umm to hugely upgrade your bottom six


Lol that’s a downgrade bud.
14 juin 2019 à 18 h 3
#11
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol that’s a downgrade bud.


prove it. i gave you stats and explantion and didnt work on you, you've tried denying things but offer up no proof that its not improvement. so prove it with some stats or give up on the fact that oko and gerg arnt better than 2 of your bottom 6.
14 juin 2019 à 19 h 26
#12
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
prove it. i gave you stats and explantion and didnt work on you, you've tried denying things but offer up no proof that its not improvement. so prove it with some stats or give up on the fact that oko and gerg arnt better than 2 of your bottom 6.


The ducks have Rakell, Comtois, Jones, Ritchie and Shore on the left side and Silfverberg, Terry, Kase, Sprong on the right. Which guys are they better than?
15 juin 2019 à 13 h 55
#13
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
The ducks have Rakell, Comtois, Jones, Ritchie and Shore on the left side and Silfverberg, Terry, Kase, Sprong on the right. Which guys are they better than?


according to corsia SHORE, GRANT,ROWNEY and pretty even with RITCHIE witch surprised me. sprong and perry were slightly higher but noting that would jump off page.
15 juin 2019 à 16 h 47
#14
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
according to corsia SHORE, GRANT,ROWNEY and pretty even with RITCHIE witch surprised me. sprong and perry were slightly higher but noting that would jump off page.


So not taking on 2 extra years of 6M just to slightly increase the 4th line.
15 juin 2019 à 17 h 54
#15
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
So not taking on 2 extra years of 6M just to slightly increase the 4th line.


its 2m$ extra for a 20 point increase on production compaired to a buyout. i still think you miss the point that this is all about being better then a buyout scenario not a whos better trade.
15 juin 2019 à 18 h 2
#16
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
its 2m$ extra for a 20 point increase on production compaired to a buyout. i still think you miss the point that this is all about being better then a buyout scenario not a whos better trade.


You missed the point. There’s no reason to take on 2 extra years at 6M for a player worse than the one they want to buy out.
16 juin 2019 à 20 h 33
#17
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
You missed the point. There’s no reason to take on 2 extra years at 6M for a player worse than the one they want to buy out.


take the buy out see how that works out for yea with that weak system of players you have coming up. dont forget to pull an Edmonton and bring them up to early and ruin there confidence while you are at it.
16 juin 2019 à 22 h 31
#18
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: jonnymc26
take the buy out see how that works out for yea with that weak system of players you have coming up. dont forget to pull an Edmonton and bring them up to early and ruin there confidence while you are at it.


Lol you mad BUF is ****?
17 juin 2019 à 17 h 19
#19
Démarrer sujet
buffalofan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol you mad BUF is ****?


who wouldnt be. but at least they are on up swing unlike some other teams
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage