SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary Winnipeg Sharks Bolts Edmonton Chicago Minnesota Vancouver

Créé par: Shakabakes
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 8 juin 2019
Publié: 8 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Lindgren or Rykov for that bottom pairing
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 750 000 $
23 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
711 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Kakko, Kaapo
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
2.
VAN
  1. Smith, Brendan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
3.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (MIN)
4.
NYR
  1. Karlsson, Melker
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin (3 325 000 $ retained)
5.
NYR
  1. Trouba, Jacob [Droits de RFA]
WPG
  1. Andersson, Lias
  2. Pionk, Neal [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (MIN)
6.
NYR
  1. Bennett, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (CGY)
7.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
8.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de NYR
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NYR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CBJ
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $80 402 776 $0 $2 395 000 $2 597 224 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Kakko, Kaapo
925 000 $925 000 $
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
833 333 $833 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 2
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 juin 2019 à 13 h 53
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 19
I like all of em. Mixed feelings on WPG Trade. Definitely think we should swap our TB 2nd with their first if we’re taking Callahan and giving Fast as well. Makes it fair tbh.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 13 h 58
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: ChampionNorth2
I like all of em. Mixed feelings on WPG Trade. Definitely think we should swap our TB 2nd with their first if we’re taking Callahan and giving Fast as well. Makes it fair tbh.


That was always my 1st option, but some think the jump in Picks for a 1 year dump is too much. I personally disagree, but I think the deal for Raddysh is just as fair.

I am relatively comfortable with the Jets deal. More uncomfortable with what Trouba might want for that contract. If he is looking for more than what I proposed, then adios to that deal.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 0
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Shakabakes
That was always my 1st option, but some think the jump in Picks for a 1 year dump is too much. I personally disagree, but I think the deal for Raddysh is just as fair.

I am relatively comfortable with the Jets deal. More uncomfortable with what Trouba might want for that contract. If he is looking for more than what I proposed, then adios to that deal.


No way it’s to much. A cup contender offloading almost $6M to keep their team together just for a spot from 27 to 58? It’s not enough to NYR. But I’d personally accept your deal as well.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
The only issue I have with trading for Namestnikov is the fact we are already full at center (Staal, Koivu, Eriksson Ek, Sturm, and Rask). If we had not re-signed Staal at the trade deadline, this could have been a really good move for us.
ChampionNorth2 a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 1
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Shakabakes
That was always my 1st option, but some think the jump in Picks for a 1 year dump is too much. I personally disagree, but I think the deal for Raddysh is just as fair.

I am relatively comfortable with the Jets deal. More uncomfortable with what Trouba might want for that contract. If he is looking for more than what I proposed, then adios to that deal.


He won’t get more for sure. I have Trouba at 8 Years $7,250,000 AAV
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 1
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: TanSor
The only issue I have with trading for Namestnikov is the fact we are already full at center (Staal, Koivu, Eriksson Ek, Sturm, and Rask). If we had not re-signed Staal at the trade deadline, this could have been a really good move for us.


Space when Zucker is gone?
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 2
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: TanSor
The only issue I have with trading for Namestnikov is the fact we are already full at center (Staal, Koivu, Eriksson Ek, Sturm, and Rask). If we had not re-signed Staal at the trade deadline, this could have been a really good move for us.


He can basically be moved around to any Forward position. Provides versatility.
ChampionNorth2 a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 3
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: ChampionNorth2
He won’t get more for sure. I have Trouba at 8 Years $7,250,000 AAV


While that is a perfect Contract for him, it's rumored his camp is looking for more. As long as he comes to his senses and realizes this is more than fair for him, then that works for everyone.
ChampionNorth2 a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 6
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Shakabakes
While that is a perfect Contract for him, it's rumored his camp is looking for more. As long as he comes to his senses and realizes this is more than fair for him, then that works for everyone.


Probably why he wants out of WPG. They can’t afford to overpay him. He’s dreaming for the 8x8 most likely.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 7
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: ChampionNorth2
Space when Zucker is gone?


Quoting: Shakabakes
He can basically be moved around to any Forward position. Provides versatility.



Not really, we have no room on the left side for him since we'd still have 6 LW's (Parise, Fiala, Donato, Greenway, Foligno, and Zucker/Namestnikov). If we're trading for a winger, it has to be a right shot right wing.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Jets think about the Trouba trade and ultimately decline. Anderson just doesn’t seem like he has much upside. Maybe a different guy like chytil or kravstov and sure
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 18
#12
Burnzie88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Sharks decline

while San Jose does want to trade M. Karlsson, this trade is not worth it.


Karlsson had 12 less points than Shattenkirk, but is 2 years younger. San Jose is already missing a lot of draft picks and won't want to give up more
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 30
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: ChampionNorth2
Probably why he wants out of WPG. They can’t afford to overpay him. He’s dreaming for the 8x8 most likely.


He can keep dreaming
ChampionNorth2 a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 33
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: TheBeardOfBurns
Sharks decline

while San Jose does want to trade M. Karlsson, this trade is not worth it.


Karlsson had 12 less points than Shattenkirk, but is 2 years younger. San Jose is already missing a lot of draft picks and won't want to give up more


They play 2 completely different positions
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 35
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: arafay
Jets think about the Trouba trade and ultimately decline. Anderson just doesn’t seem like he has much upside. Maybe a different guy like chytil or kravstov and sure


We could consider Howden instead, but not Chytil or Kravtsov.

Ultimately, this trade might not happen anyway. Not only is it possible for another team to make a better proposal, but Trouba's lofty Contract demands could harpoon a possible deal, just the same.
arafay a aimé ceci.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 36
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: TanSor
Not really, we have no room on the left side for him since we'd still have 6 LW's (Parise, Fiala, Donato, Greenway, Foligno, and Zucker/Namestnikov). If we're trading for a winger, it has to be a right shot right wing.


So would Strome work for you?
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 42
#17
Burnzie88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: Shakabakes
They play 2 completely different positions


exactly

San Jose does not need more defenseman, especially one who was -15
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 50
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: TheBeardOfBurns
exactly

San Jose does not need more defenseman, especially one who was -15


Quoting: TheBeardOfBurns
exactly

San Jose does not need more defenseman, especially one who was -15


You could have thrown any other analytic or statistic in there to make a case for yourself. Once you use +-, all credibility goes out the window.

Nevermind the fact that he was on a young rebuilding team that struggled (so of course, good or bad, he would have a lower +-), but that stat itself is, and always has been, completely asinine. Rewarding/Punishing someone for something that happened on the ice, even if they had absolutely nothing to do with it, is ridiculous.
8 juin 2019 à 14 h 57
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Shakabakes
So would Strome work for you?


I don't think so. I liked him last offseason but this offseason we should be looking for a top 6 forward and Strome is more of a 3rd liner.
8 juin 2019 à 15 h 19
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: TanSor
I don't think so. I liked him last offseason but this offseason we should be looking for a top 6 forward and Strome is more of a 3rd liner.


Considering the inexperienced team we had, he played pretty damn well. For a full Season, he was on a 25 goal/45 point pace with us once he escaped Edmonton. Could even do better in Minny.
8 juin 2019 à 17 h 8
#21
Burnzie88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: Shakabakes
You could have thrown any other analytic or statistic in there to make a case for yourself. Once you use +-, all credibility goes out the window.

Nevermind the fact that he was on a young rebuilding team that struggled (so of course, good or bad, he would have a lower +-), but that stat itself is, and always has been, completely asinine. Rewarding/Punishing someone for something that happened on the ice, even if they had absolutely nothing to do with it, is ridiculous.


Fine, but San Jose has enough right handed defenseman. Burns and Braun are already signed. Heed will most likely be re-signed and maybe even Karlsson. They also have Roy in the AHL who had 18 points in 58 games. Merkley should be ready next season.
8 juin 2019 à 17 h 11
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: TheBeardOfBurns
Fine, but San Jose has enough right handed defenseman. Burns and Braun are already signed. Heed will most likely be re-signed and maybe even Karlsson. They also have Roy in the AHL who had 18 points in 58 games. Merkley should be ready next season.


A lot of Shark proposals have Braun potentially being moved. So between him possibly out, and Karlsson probably not returning, I figured there could be potential interest in Shattenkirk (at a reduced rate) on the right side.
8 juin 2019 à 19 h 3
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Quoting: Shakabakes
We could consider Howden instead, but not Chytil or Kravtsov.

Ultimately, this trade might not happen anyway. Not only is it possible for another team to make a better proposal, but Trouba's lofty Contract demands could harpoon a possible deal, just the same.


Then jets decline
8 juin 2019 à 19 h 35
#24
Burnzie88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: Shakabakes
A lot of Shark proposals have Braun potentially being moved. So between him possibly out, and Karlsson probably not returning, I figured there could be potential interest in Shattenkirk (at a reduced rate) on the right side.


Possibly, but I would expect them to bring up Roy and have him play with a veteran like Vlasic. They might also sign a UFA just so they don't have to give up picks.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage