Shouldn't Krug have gotten a penalty for that hit on Thomas? Thomas didn't have the puck, did he? But yes, there should have been a penalty against Perron for pulling Krug's helmet off. But you could argue there could have been two calls before plus one against Krug after.
Shouldn't Krug have gotten a penalty for that hit on Thomas? Thomas didn't have the puck, did he? But yes, there should have been a penalty against Perron for pulling Krug's helmet off. But you could argue there could have been two calls before plus one against Krug after.
Nothing wrong with that hit bud. That was a thing of beauty.
Nothing wrong with that hit bud. That was a thing of beauty.
Well, i'd like to get those out of the game, but I didn't get a 2nd chance to look at it. I talked to a family member over the phone after the game and he saw a replay and said Thomas had the puck. I wasn't sure if he had the puck or not. If he did, then I think it was a good non-call by the refs to not call a penalty.
Well, i'd like to get those out of the game, but I didn't get a 2nd chance to look at it. I talked to a family member over the phone after the game and he saw a replay and said Thomas had the puck. I wasn't sure if he had the puck or not. If he did, then I think it was a good non-call by the refs to not call a penalty.
Take those out of the game!!!?!?!? Are you kidding?!?! That is 100% a fantastic well executed hockey check. Why not just remove contact all together.
You also said 'Id like to get those out of the game" which is nuts.
I watched the replay and it looked like he got him in the head. I paused it a few times and that's what it looked like to me if you see it again. And yes, I'd like to get those out of the game. I'm not saying remove all contact, but that shouldn't be allowed. What do you think of this hit?
I remember there was no suspension or anything when he CLEARLY went shoulder-to-head. Do you agree that should have been a suspension? The Krug one wasn't as bad but still ...
I watched the replay and it looked like he got him in the head. I paused it a few times and that's what it looked like to me if you see it again. And yes, I'd like to get those out of the game. I'm not saying remove all contact, but that shouldn't be allowed. What do you think of this hit?
I remember there was no suspension or anything when he CLEARLY went shoulder-to-head. Do you agree that should have been a suspension? The Krug one wasn't as bad but still ...
There was nothing wrong with the Krug hit. These two hits are totally different. The Krug his was fantastic
I watched the replay and it looked like he got him in the head. I paused it a few times and that's what it looked like to me if you see it again. And yes, I'd like to get those out of the game. I'm not saying remove all contact, but that shouldn't be allowed. What do you think of this hit?
I remember there was no suspension or anything when he CLEARLY went shoulder-to-head. Do you agree that should have been a suspension? The Krug one wasn't as bad but still ...
It also wouldn’t be a suspension unless it is able to be a 10 game suspension. There is a ratio for the playoffs. 2:1 for the first round 3-5:1 for second 6-8:1 for third, and 10-12:1 for finals. A possible stanly cup game is probably 20-25:1
It also wouldn’t be a suspension unless it is able to be a 10 game suspension. There is a ratio for the playoffs. 2:1 for the first round 3-5:1 for second 6-8:1 for third, and 10-12:1 for finals. A possible stanly cup game is probably 20-25:1
I wouldn't say 20-25:1. But yes, the playoff games (especially in the finals) are more. But 0 is the same. I'd say usually give someone a game in the playoffs if it gets a game in the regular season. But then after that, don't give anyone 2 games unless it's a lot more than 2 in the regular season.
McGruff a aimé ceci.
Répondre
CapFriendly
CapFriendly