SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

B's Clean Slate

Créé par: Moog121
Équipe: 2016-17 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 2 juin 2016
Publié: 2 juin 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Time to cash in Rask and Krejci for top 4 Dmen. No sense paying a goalie 7m on a boarderline playoff team. Same for Krejci, he does not have the caliber wings he needs and Bergy is now top center. Gibson/Johnson can hold down fort till Subban et al are ready. Resign Eriksson as top RW on market and Nielsen as depth at center. Keep Vatrano-Spooner-Pasta together as a young offensive line and vets Beleskey-Nielsen-Stafford for experience. Cheap 4th line options Kelly/Stewert add versatlity and protect Acciari. That will leave 12m next year to give Marchy/Pasta/Spoons raises.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 500 000 $
34 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Fowler, Cam
  2. Gibson, John
ANA
  1. Rask, Tuukka
2.
BOS
  1. Stafford, Drew
Détails additionnels:
Rights to RFA Trouba
WPG
  1. Krejci, David
  2. Lauzon, Jérémy
3.
BOS
    2016 6th round pick
    ARI
    1. Hayes, Jimmy
    4.
    BOS
      2016 6th round pick
      EDM
      1. Seidenberg, Dennis
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2373 000 000 $64 801 667 $0 $165 000 $8 198 333 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Marchand, Brad
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Bergeron, Patrice
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Eriksson, Loui
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 6
      Vatrano, Frank
      792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Spooner, Ryan
      950 000 $950 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Pastrnak, David
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Beleskey, Matt
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Nielsen, Frans
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 6
      Stafford, Drew
      4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Kelly, Chris
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Stewart, Chris
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Ferraro, Landon
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Acciari, Noel
      792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Connolly, Brett
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Chara, Zdeno
      6 916 667 $6 916 667 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Trouba, Jacob
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Fowler, Cam
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Miller, Kevan
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 4
      Krug, Torey
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      McQuaid, Adam
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Gibson, John
      2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Miller, Colin
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Johnson, Chad
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      2 juin 2016 à 22 h 3
      #1
      palhal
      LongtimeLeafsufferer
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 61,356
      Mentions "j'aime": 23,627
      One reason the Ducks are looking to trade their goalie Anderson is because Gibson and Anderson is a getting to be expensive as goalie combo....So I doubt if they would want Rask as a single 7m goalie.
      2 juin 2016 à 22 h 33
      #2
      Moog121
      Démarrer sujet
      Moog121
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2015
      Messages: 143
      Mentions "j'aime": 7
      Noted with thanks palhal. The philosophy would be to find a playoff team in need of battle tested goalie. Hopefully getting a top 4 puck moving D man in return. The age of paying 7-8m for a goalie might be over after watching the kids in the playoffs.
      3 juin 2016 à 9 h 30
      #3
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Moog - you're kind of contradicting yourself. You are saying that the age of paying a goalie $7 mill is over - so why would another team want to take on Rask? I don't think Rask or Krejci hold that much value in a trade due to their contracts. I think the Bruins are stuck with them.
      3 juin 2016 à 9 h 53
      #4
      BruinsGuyFYI
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BBB22
      Moog - you're kind of contradicting yourself. You are saying that the age of paying a goalie $7 mill is over - so why would another team want to take on Rask? I don't think Rask or Krejci hold that much value in a trade due to their contracts. I think the Bruins are stuck with them.
      I disagree about Krejci, he's got tons of value. He was leading the NHL in scoring 20 or so games into the season then had some nagging injuries which slowed him down. He had to have surgery after the season ended and still put up solid #'s.
      3 juin 2016 à 10 h 21
      #5
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      BruinsGuy - I disagree. There's a lot working against Krejci in the trade market. 1. He has to approve of any trade due to his NTC, which wipes out a handful of teams (Edmonton, Winnipeg, and any other city him and his wife don't want to live in). 2. He is the highest paid 60 point guy in the league. 3. Many teams that he would approve a trade to (big market teams), can snap up a 60 point UFA for less than $7.25 mill per year for the next 5 years. 4. Nagging injuries....he seems to get these every year. 5. He's 30 years old w/ 5 years to go on his deal.
      3 juin 2016 à 10 h 33
      #6
      BruinsGuyFYI
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BBB22
      BruinsGuy - I disagree. There's a lot working against Krejci in the trade market. 1. He has to approve of any trade due to his NTC, which wipes out a handful of teams (Edmonton, Winnipeg, and any other city him and his wife don't want to live in). 2. He is the highest paid 60 point guy in the league. 3. Many teams that he would approve a trade to (big market teams), can snap up a 60 point UFA for less than $7.25 mill per year for the next 5 years. 4. Nagging injuries....he seems to get these every year. 5. He's 30 years old w/ 5 years to go on his deal.
      Which one of those FA's gets better in the playoffs and has lead the playoffs in scoring? The only FA compareable to Krejci is Stamkos and hes looking at 10M.
      3 juin 2016 à 10 h 39
      #7
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      That was 5 five years ago when he was 25 years old.

      Krejci and Stamkos are not comparable at all. Stamkos is capable of scoring 50 goals, at worst, he'll score you 35. If I was a team looking for a C this off season and willing to pay $7.25 mill in salary, I'd sign Backes for $6 mill and use the $1.25 mill elsewhere. And as an added plus, they wouldn't have to give up anything.

      I think you're overvaluing Krejci cause of the sweater he wears.
      3 juin 2016 à 10 h 47
      #8
      BruinsGuyFYI
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BBB22
      That was 5 five years ago when he was 25 years old.

      Krejci and Stamkos are not comparable at all. Stamkos is capable of scoring 50 goals, at worst, he'll score you 35. If I was a team looking for a C this off season and willing to pay $7.25 mill in salary, I'd sign Backes for $6 mill and use the $1.25 mill elsewhere. And as an added plus, they wouldn't have to give up anything.

      I think you're overvaluing Krejci cause of the sweater he wears.
      I'm not overvalueing him at all. Backes choked in every playoff but this year and hes older and more of a 50 point guy. The 1.25m is because he is clearly better than Backes. Most Bruins fans overvalue Bergeron, Krejci is the same in terms of what he means to the team, and therefore got paid more than Bergeron in terms of cap hit.
      3 juin 2016 à 10 h 56
      #9
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      You just compared David Krejci to Steven Stamkos, so I think it's safe to say that you're overvaluing him. Krejci isn't some playoff hero, and he's definitely over paid. He lead the team in playoff scoring - FIVE YEARS AGO!! Move on.
      3 juin 2016 à 11 h 1
      #10
      BruinsGuyFYI
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BBB22
      You just compared David Krejci to Steven Stamkos, so I think it's safe to say that you're overvaluing him. Krejci isn't some playoff hero, and he's definitely over paid. He lead the team in playoff scoring - FIVE YEARS AGO!! Move on.
      He led the team in 2010-2011. he led the LEAGUE in 2012 2013. Hes more Compare able to Stamkos than he is Backes. Stamkos hasn't been nearly the player he was before Hamilton broke his leg.
      3 juin 2016 à 11 h 11
      #11
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Stamkos has scored 80 goals over the past two seasons. You would be a horrific GM.
      3 juin 2016 à 11 h 17
      #12
      BruinsGuyFYI
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BBB22
      Stamkos has scored 80 goals over the past two seasons. You would be a horrific GM.
      yes 80 not like he was before the injury when he got 60 in one year. Stamkos is a one trick pony now. where he used to be a top 5 player like Ovie.
      3 juin 2016 à 11 h 41
      #13
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      You make zero sense.
      3 juin 2016 à 11 h 45
      #14
      BruinsGuyFYI
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 177
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BBB22
      You make zero sense.
      Believe me Stammer will never hit 60 goals again, prob not even 50.
      3 juin 2016 à 11 h 54
      #15
      BBB22
      Bruins2016/17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 109
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: BruinsGuyFYI
      Quoting: BBB22
      You make zero sense.
      Believe me Stammer will never hit 60 goals again, prob not even 50.


      Stamkos at his worst, is stilll not comparable to Krecji piling up 60 points on 10 goals, and 50 2nd assists.
      Moog121 a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage