SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Possibility

Créé par: Webbles
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 24 mars 2019
Publié: 24 mars 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
79 250 000 $
32 925 000 $
32 925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Pick a team. Apparently lots of interest in Brown.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2019 (CBJ)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
Pick a team that needs to hit the cap floor.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $77 765 532 $0 $482 500 $5 734 468 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 925 000 $2 925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 925 000 $2 925 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 mars 2019 à 19 h 48
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,633
Mentions "j'aime": 23,320
No team ever, has taken on expensive long term contracts that actually cost real $$$$ to reach the cap floor. Three years of 36 year Lovejoy? No thanks.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 mars 2019 à 19 h 58
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 608
Mentions "j'aime": 185
Quoting: palhal
No team ever, has taken on expensive long term contracts that actually cost real $$$$ to reach the cap floor. Three years of 36 year Lovejoy? No thanks.


*35 year old Lovejoy* You can't always get what you want but if you try sometimes you'll get what you need. Babs deserves a slightly cheaper, slightly younger right handed Hainsey replacement to annoying the armchair coaches of Twitter. ?

If indeed your initial statement is correct would you please excuse me. And thank you for the information good sir.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
24 mars 2019 à 20 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 9
I don't think marner would sign that low for 7 years. there were reports (bob mckenzie) that his camp think that there worth the same as AM. I'd think the lowest he would go would be $10.5 for 5 (same term as matthews).

also you would have to give something decent with zatsiev to dump him. no team would take him for free.
Webbles a aimé ceci.
24 mars 2019 à 20 h 17
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,022
Mentions "j'aime": 7,245
Johnsson might agree, but Kapanen and Marner definitely don’t
24 mars 2019 à 20 h 57
#5
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Danes1294
*35 year old Lovejoy* You can't always get what you want but if you try sometimes you'll get what you need. Babs deserves a slightly cheaper, slightly younger right handed Hainsey replacement to annoying the armchair coaches of Twitter. ?

If indeed your initial statement is correct would you please excuse me. And thank you for the information good sir.


Lmao... best response of the day goes to you sir lol.
Webbles a aimé ceci.
24 mars 2019 à 20 h 58
#6
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Johnsson might agree, but Kapanen and Marner definitely don’t


Think it will be close to that number on a 1-2 year deal. It’s either that or a trade as I don’t see dubas moving nylander.
Webbles a aimé ceci.
24 mars 2019 à 21 h 0
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: db875685
I don't think marner would sign that low for 7 years. there were reports (bob mckenzie) that his camp think that there worth the same as AM. I'd think the lowest he would go would be $10.5 for 5 (same term as matthews).

also you would have to give something decent with zatsiev to dump him. no team would take him for free.


Actually I would put his value between a 3rd and a 5th. If it weren’t for cap issues I would have no issues keeping him next season. He has been solid all year.
Webbles a aimé ceci.
24 mars 2019 à 21 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 346
Jamiepo, your statement supports what most people say about Zatsiev. You would keep him except for cap issues. I.e. his usefulness on the ice vs his cap hit is unacceptable. He is your only right handed D and yet he is the one you want to dump because of the cap. You can't have it both ways, he can't be the first person you want to dump because of cap problems and then turn around and say he has value. If Toronto doesn't value his usefulness vs his cap hit, why do you think any other team will?
db875685 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2019 à 9 h 51
#9
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: gmurrayt
Jamiepo, your statement supports what most people say about Zatsiev. You would keep him except for cap issues. I.e. his usefulness on the ice vs his cap hit is unacceptable. He is your only right handed D and yet he is the one you want to dump because of the cap. You can't have it both ways, he can't be the first person you want to dump because of cap problems and then turn around and say he has value. If Toronto doesn't value his usefulness vs his cap hit, why do you think any other team will?


Few things wrong with your analysis.

1. The players I would move in order.

Marleau
Brown
Kadri
Nylander
Muzzin
Zaitsev

I don’t think any of these players are useless but salary needs to be moved.

2. Zaitsev is not our only RHD, I do think he is our best at the moment though.

3. Just because a player is not on the best contract doesn’t mean they are useless. Toronto can’t afford the luxury of paying a 2nd pairing Dman 4.5m. Although many teams do. Our high priced offence doesn’t allow for it. At most zaitsev makes about 1m too much. I would say it’s closer to 750k. For most teams this isn’t an issue. But it does take away most of his value. Otherwise I would be trading him for a pick and a prospect.

On a side note it’s funny how RHD get some sort of a premium on this site but because zaitsev is a leaf and a bit overpaid we need to package him with Matthews to trade him.
25 mars 2019 à 11 h 30
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 608
Mentions "j'aime": 185
Quoting: db875685
I don't think marner would sign that low for 7 years. there were reports (bob mckenzie) that his camp think that there worth the same as AM. I'd think the lowest he would go would be $10.5 for 5 (same term as matthews).

also you would have to give something decent with zatsiev to dump him. no team would take him for free.


If I needed help on defense, (especially the right side), and I had room for 4.5 m for the foreseeable future, I would gladly take Zaitsev for free. He's not as bad as most people think. But the question is ... is there a team like that?
25 mars 2019 à 11 h 49
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 9
if there was a team willing to take zaitsev for a 5th he would already be gone. stop acting like anybody suggested you would have to add matthews to him. Your kidding yourself if you think someone is going to take him for free. maybe it's your leaf bias which is telling you that he's a good player while in reality he's not. he has heavily declined since his rookie season.

maybe you should take a look at what other teams have giving up to get rid of cap dumps.

Quoting: Jamiepo
Few things wrong with your analysis.

1. The players I would move in order.

Marleau
Brown
Kadri
Nylander
Muzzin
Zaitsev

I don’t think any of these players are useless but salary needs to be moved.

2. Zaitsev is not our only RHD, I do think he is our best at the moment though.

3. Just because a player is not on the best contract doesn’t mean they are useless. Toronto can’t afford the luxury of paying a 2nd pairing Dman 4.5m. Although many teams do. Our high priced offence doesn’t allow for it. At most zaitsev makes about 1m too much. I would say it’s closer to 750k. For most teams this isn’t an issue. But it does take away most of his value. Otherwise I would be trading him for a pick and a prospect.

On a side note it’s funny how RHD get some sort of a premium on this site but because zaitsev is a leaf and a bit overpaid we need to package him with Matthews to trade him.
Webbles et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2019 à 11 h 52
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Danes1294
If I needed help on defense, (especially the right side), and I had room for 4.5 m for the foreseeable future, I would gladly take Zaitsev for free. He's not as bad as most people think. But the question is ... is there a team like that?


no one is going to take him for free. everyone knows he's declined heavily since his rookie season and that the leafs will be tight against the cap. nobody is helping the leafs out for free.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2019 à 12 h 2
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 608
Mentions "j'aime": 185
Quoting: db875685
no one is going to take him for free. everyone knows he's declined heavily since his rookie season and that the leafs will be tight against the cap. nobody is helping the leafs out for free.


I would disagree with the heavy decline comment. And like I said up there, (maybe I wasn't very clear), they would be helping themselves out. Not the Leafs.
Perhaps we will have to agree to disagree and that's ok. ? cheers mate.
GenXHockey et db875685 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2019 à 12 h 4
#14
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: db875685
if there was a team willing to take zaitsev for a 5th he would already be gone. stop acting like anybody suggested you would have to add matthews to him. Your kidding yourself if you think someone is going to take him for free. maybe it's your leaf bias which is telling you that he's a good player while in reality he's not. he has heavily declined since his rookie season.

maybe you should take a look at what other teams have giving up to get rid of cap dumps.


He’s not a cap dump... that’s my point. It’s not a bias. He plays some tough minutes and he’s dependable. With our lack of RHD depth I don’t see paying to move him as the best option.

Much like Manson this season he is just being used in a different role but he certainly isn’t bad. His first season he had tons of PP time and was a defensive liability. Get off hockey dB and watch a game. Who’s on the ice when we’re holding a one goal lead for the last 2 minutes? There’s a reason why Babs trusts him and paired him with gardiner all season.
Webbles a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2019 à 12 h 13
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 346
Quoting: Jamiepo
Few things wrong with your analysis.

1. The players I would move in order.

Marleau
Brown
Kadri
Nylander
Muzzin
Zaitsev

I don’t think any of these players are useless but salary needs to be moved.

2. Zaitsev is not our only RHD, I do think he is our best at the moment though.

3. Just because a player is not on the best contract doesn’t mean they are useless. Toronto can’t afford the luxury of paying a 2nd pairing Dman 4.5m. Although many teams do. Our high priced offence doesn’t allow for it. At most zaitsev makes about 1m too much. I would say it’s closer to 750k. For most teams this isn’t an issue. But it does take away most of his value. Otherwise I would be trading him for a pick and a prospect.

On a side note it’s funny how RHD get some sort of a premium on this site but because zaitsev is a leaf and a bit overpaid we need to package him with Matthews to trade him.


I did not call anyone useless. All players in the NHL deserve to be there. However, in a hard cap world, everything has to be measured in usefulness vs cost. If I owned a big gas guzzling truck that only gets about 10 km per litre, the truck is not useless, it would take me where I wanted to go, but its usefulness is more than offset by the cost. Big difference.

Also, regarding RH vs LH defense balance, seems like it is Babcock that is a big believer in that, as are many of the Toronto posters on here. Don't think anyone is saying that AM needs to be included with Zaitsev to move him, but most people seem to realize that teams will not take Zaitsev off Toronto's hands without additional compensation, and certainly will not give up assets for him. Because Toronto is in a position where they must move cap to become complaint next year, this drops his value even more. Not saying Zaitsev is useless, but in a cap world, his net value is not good.
25 mars 2019 à 12 h 39
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 19
Mentions "j'aime": 9
I watch games and I read a ton of forums (hf , reddit,db). common thing I see is leaf fans repeatedly trying to dump zatisev. half of them actually believe he has value and the other half thinks he's a dump. your entitled to your own opinion but I don't think anyone would take him for free. I guess we'll see in the summer since the leafs will need to move him to make room for matthews/marner extensions but I'd easily bet $1k that nobody would take him for free.

Quoting: Jamiepo
He’s not a cap dump... that’s my point. It’s not a bias. He plays some tough minutes and he’s dependable. With our lack of RHD depth I don’t see paying to move him as the best option.

Much like Manson this season he is just being used in a different role but he certainly isn’t bad. His first season he had tons of PP time and was a defensive liability. Get off hockey dB and watch a game. Who’s on the ice when we’re holding a one goal lead for the last 2 minutes? There’s a reason why Babs trusts him and paired him with gardiner all season.
25 mars 2019 à 14 h 31
#17
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: gmurrayt
I did not call anyone useless. All players in the NHL deserve to be there. However, in a hard cap world, everything has to be measured in usefulness vs cost. If I owned a big gas guzzling truck that only gets about 10 km per litre, the truck is not useless, it would take me where I wanted to go, but its usefulness is more than offset by the cost. Big difference.

Also, regarding RH vs LH defense balance, seems like it is Babcock that is a big believer in that, as are many of the Toronto posters on here. Don't think anyone is saying that AM needs to be included with Zaitsev to move him, but most people seem to realize that teams will not take Zaitsev off Toronto's hands without additional compensation, and certainly will not give up assets for him. Because Toronto is in a position where they must move cap to become complaint next year, this drops his value even more. Not saying Zaitsev is useless, but in a cap world, his net value is not good.


I agree with that... his value is exactly that... not good. The absolute best we get for him is a 3rd and that’s wishful. I would be happy with a 5th. I think his contract makes his value neutral.

The leafs don’t have to move zaitsev. To me a team that needs RHD shouldn’t trade their best one for nothing. To me a player like Kadri or nylander would bring in a much better return. I don’t think dubas views it that way and I can’t help but think that muzzin wasn’t brought in to replace gardiner but zaitsev. His inability to play the right side in the defensive zone hurts that idea though.
gmurrayt a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2019 à 15 h 17
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,633
Mentions "j'aime": 23,320
Gee, I don't know why folks Zaitsev is such bad value at 4.5m. (He's the second high paid Leaf Dmen) Carolina has 4 Dmen making 4.5m or more. Washington 3, Montreal with 3 with Alzner. Calgary 3, San Jose 3. Winnipeg 3. St Louis 3
The real problem with trading Zaitsev, is the Leafs don't any viable replacement to play big minutes next year. So Zaitsev's salary isn't so bad, it's his five years left on contract that would discourage a trade.
Leafs with their RFA signings next year are about 6.5m over cap.
So order of guys to be traded IMO
1. A retired Marleau
2. Kadri....and someone else
3. Brown and probably Kadri
4. Nylander. He's my first choice because it just one position that has to be filled.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage