SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fowler

Créé par: LeafsFan123
Équipe: 2018-19 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2019
Publié: 26 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
NTC could be an issue, also giving up a first would hurt but it solves long term D issues and Olofsson will be a good 3C/2C in the future which is pretty replaceable at this point due to the center depth and prospects. I think the value is pretty close to fair becuase fowler has been fairly inconsistent and is having a especially underperforming year so far,
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Lehkonen, Artturi
  2. Olofsson, Jacob
  3. Reilly, Mike
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (MTL)
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Any team looking for depth
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2179 500 000 $72 297 143 $0 $2 682 500 $7 202 857 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
748 333 $748 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. 2019 à 11 h 1
#1
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,807
Mentions "j'aime": 10,365
The value is there, but Montreal isn't going to make this trade. They are focusing on the future and building within.
Poehling a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2019 à 11 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
The value is there, but Montreal isn't going to make this trade. They are focusing on the future and building within.


Yes, but Romanov, Harris, Walford, Tyszka, and Mete are the only half-decent LHD prospects in the system, and the only one that looks like a potential top four guy is Romanov, and if he doesn't turn out...... there's just no No. 1 LD in Montreal. Now I doubt that Fowler is the answer. Honestly, trading up at the draft to select Cam York might be better. IDK. What are your thoughts on the LHD future of Montreal.
26 janv. 2019 à 11 h 29
#3
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,807
Mentions "j'aime": 10,365
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
Yes, but Romanov, Harris, Walford, Tyszka, and Mete are the only half-decent LHD prospects in the system, and the only one that looks like a potential top four guy is Romanov, and if he doesn't turn out...... there's just no No. 1 LD in Montreal. Now I doubt that Fowler is the answer. Honestly, trading up at the draft to select Cam York might be better. IDK. What are your thoughts on the LHD future of Montreal.


Mete at 20 is playing against the opposing teams top lines and shutting them down. How are you going to tell me he doesn't have top 4 potential? Jordan Harris at 18 is playing on North Eastern's top line which is unheard of in College.

We definitely have some good defensemen in the system, and we have 3 picks in the top 2 rounds in this years draft which I imagine Bergevin will draft some more defensemen.

I am really hoping Bergevin sticks to what he says and build through the draft, because this team can have a long, successful run if they just stick to the plan.
26 janv. 2019 à 11 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 445
The moment the Habs are back in the playoffs, there's a belief of getting assets for a "quick-fix". They should focus on keeping their young prospects. Don't forget that the team is coming from a 2 out 3 years of missing the playoffs which means the Habs have been INCONSISTENT.
NucksFanForLife a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2019 à 11 h 57
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
Mete at 20 is playing against the opposing teams top lines and shutting them down. How are you going to tell me he doesn't have top 4 potential? Jordan Harris at 18 is playing on North Eastern's top line which is unheard of in College.

We definitely have some good defensemen in the system, and we have 3 picks in the top 2 rounds in this years draft which I imagine Bergevin will draft some more defensemen.

I am really hoping Bergevin sticks to what he says and build through the draft, because this team can have a long, successful run if they just stick to the plan.


I see the same thing with Flyers fans who used to try to add UFAs and trade for big names - when their prospect pool is incredibly deep at every position and all they have to do is slowly sell and wait. Building through the system and selling bad contracts in the process is the best way to rebuild/retool. Mete..... He's like a left shot Pesce. So yes, he's a top four D, but ideally on a contender you would have him as a 4D or 5D. He needs to show more offense to be a top four guy. He's great at transition, but I'd like to see him playing a bit more offensively. Mete is a part of your future core, he just needs to become more well rounded. Time should do that but there is no guarantees. Romanov, Mete, Harris, Weber, Brook, Juulsen, Fleury looks pretty good to me. It doesn't look elite though. It'll need to be better when Price is past his prime.
26 janv. 2019 à 12 h 28
#6
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,807
Mentions "j'aime": 10,365
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
I see the same thing with Flyers fans who used to try to add UFAs and trade for big names - when their prospect pool is incredibly deep at every position and all they have to do is slowly sell and wait. Building through the system and selling bad contracts in the process is the best way to rebuild/retool. Mete..... He's like a left shot Pesce. So yes, he's a top four D, but ideally on a contender you would have him as a 4D or 5D. He needs to show more offense to be a top four guy. He's great at transition, but I'd like to see him playing a bit more offensively. Mete is a part of your future core, he just needs to become more well rounded. Time should do that but there is no guarantees. Romanov, Mete, Harris, Weber, Brook, Juulsen, Fleury looks pretty good to me. It doesn't look elite though. It'll need to be better when Price is past his prime.


I can tell you don't watch Montreal games, Mete is very offensive. He just can't translate it to point production. He has been the most unlucky player in the NHL this year. He is very smart and makes very intelligent plays with no time to do so. This is the first year in a very long time where Montreal has been able to win with a struggling Price.
26 janv. 2019 à 12 h 29
#7
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,807
Mentions "j'aime": 10,365
Quoting: EzioUchiha
The moment the Habs are back in the playoffs, there's a belief of getting assets for a "quick-fix". They should focus on keeping their young prospects. Don't forget that the team is coming from a 2 out 3 years of missing the playoffs which means the Habs have been INCONSISTENT.


I agree about not wasting future assets, but the inconsistency came from Price. This is the first year in Price's career where Montreal has been able to win without a top notch Carey Price. In the previous years, when Price played bad, we lost. This year when Price plays bad, we win.
26 janv. 2019 à 12 h 33
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
I can tell you don't watch Montreal games, Mete is very offensive. He just can't translate it to point production. He has been the most unlucky player in the NHL this year. He is very smart and makes very intelligent plays with no time to do so. This is the first year in a very long time where Montreal has been able to win with a struggling Price.


Price isn't really struggling, he's just not 100% himself. I never said that Mete didn't create offense, I want to see him on the scoreboard. 89 straight unlucky games? Yes he's not a dud offensively, or he wouldn't be putting up the oiSH% and GF/60 that he is this year and the points that he put up in the OHL, short AHL term, and WJC. I don't think he's bad, I just think he's going to be an average to slightly above average 2LHD.
26 janv. 2019 à 12 h 38
#9
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,807
Mentions "j'aime": 10,365
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
Price isn't really struggling, he's just not 100% himself. I never said that Mete didn't create offense, I want to see him on the scoreboard. 89 straight unlucky games? Yes he's not a dud offensively, or he wouldn't be putting up the oiSH% and GF/60 that he is this year and the points that he put up in the OHL, short AHL term, and WJC. I don't think he's bad, I just think he's going to be an average to slightly above average 2LHD.


Price definitely was struggling. He had a below .900 for the first 2 months of the season, only lately has he turned it on, and because of that, we went from being a WC team to a threat in the Atlantic. Yes 89 unlucky games, his ability to not score has become a Meme in Montreal. 2 goals called back, countless points, super unlucky bounces, anything you can name, has happened to him. Watch a single Montreal game and you will understand what I am talking about, there is a reason he is playing beside Weber, because he compliments him very well. He has some of the smoothest skating you will see in the NHL and he is wicked fast. I have no problem agreeing with you that he will only become an above average 2LHD, but to say he won't become a top 4 defensemen is absurd.
NucksFanForLife a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage