SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NEW YORK RANGERS 2018-19 DEADLINE 10

Créé par: Skeating622
Équipe: 2018-19 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 16 janv. 2019
Publié: 16 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
NEW YORK RANGERS 2018-19 DEADLINE 1.0
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Chmelevski, Alexander
  2. Labanc, Kevin
Détails additionnels:
Linus Karlsson
Center -- shoots R
Born Nov 16 1999
[19 yrs. ago]
Height 6.00 -- Weight 179 [183 cm/81 kg]
Drafted by San Jose Sharks
- round 3 #87 overall 2018 NHL Entry Draft
SJS
  1. McQuaid, Adam (750 000 $ retained)
  2. Zuccarello, Mats (2 250 000 $ retained)
2.
NYR
  1. Neal, James
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Fast, Jesper
  2. Staal, Marc
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYR)
3.
NYR
  1. Lemieux, Brendan
  2. Niku, Sami
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
David Gustafsson
Center -- shoots L
Born Apr 11 2000
[18 yrs. ago]
Height 6.02 -- Weight 196 [188 cm/89 kg]
Drafted by Winnipeg Jets
- round 2 #60 overall 2018 NHL Entry Draft
4.
NYR
  1. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Vesey, Jimmy
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CGY
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $65 455 652 $0 $2 297 500 $14 044 348 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
717 500 $717 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
916 667 $916 667 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
839 167 $839 167 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
708 750 $708 750 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
874 125 $874 125 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 janv. 2019 à 16 h 35
#1
waveshavearrived
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Labanc is the most talented player in the trade and a full 8 years younger than Zuccarello. I don't see how the Sharks make this trade for 2 veteran rentals, 1 who is producing less than the core piece given up and the other who wouldn't even crack their 3 D-pairings. Why would the Sharks even want McQuaid?
16 janv. 2019 à 16 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 22
take away the deal for neal two more years of staal is fine not five of james neal which wont end until he is 37 plus fast is someone who we should keep if we can.
16 janv. 2019 à 16 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: DOTFAM
Labanc is the most talented player in the trade and a full 8 years younger than Zuccarello. I don't see how the Sharks make this trade for 2 veteran rentals, 1 who is producing less than the core piece given up and the other who wouldn't even crack their 3 D-pairings. Why would the Sharks even want McQuaid?


mquaid is the type of player every team wants in the playoffs and zucc by name alone would get a nice return but now that the groin injury that was effecting him is gone he is starting produce once again
16 janv. 2019 à 16 h 43
#4
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,006
Mentions "j'aime": 2,595
The Jets say no. Two high priced players for a huge return...No thx
16 janv. 2019 à 16 h 49
#5
waveshavearrived
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: n388845
mquaid is the type of player every team wants in the playoffs and zucc by name alone would get a nice return but now that the groin injury that was effecting him is gone he is starting produce once again


I'm just pointing out that with Burns/Karlsson/Braun all on the right side, I don't see how it makes sense to give up a young proven NHL forward in Labanc along with a top-50 prospect (according to Pronman's most recent rankings) in Chmelevski and the team's most recent 3rd rd pick for 2 rental players.
mhan63 a aimé ceci.
16 janv. 2019 à 16 h 52
#6
Démarrer sujet
Skeating_sec224
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 628
Mentions "j'aime": 144
Quoting: n388845
take away the deal for neal two more years of staal is fine not five of james neal which wont end until he is 37 plus fast is someone who we should keep if we can.


I should have added some notes but the idea was to take Neal, see if he can find some form next year, move him (keeping some salary)or buy him out. Expose him in the expansion draft for 2020 ....
But yeah i was torn, but i think Neal can start scoring some goals again & Staal won't get any better at defense, & we want to clear spots for the younger guys. I think Quickie won't be a part of the rebuild down the line & Calgary might need that to do the Staal/Neal swap. Staal can help the Flames on the 3rd Pair. Hes a vet, been to finals, Conference finals....
16 janv. 2019 à 17 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
Skeating_sec224
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 628
Mentions "j'aime": 144
Quoting: Jetman
The Jets say no. Two high priced players for a huge return...No thx


Curious what a Hayes to Jets deal would look like form a Jets fan perspective?
In this scenario the Jets keep their best prospect(s). (Kristian Vesalainen, Dylan Samberg, Appleton ...???)
Trade from a point of strength on the back end.
Get 2 top 6 forwards, Namemstikov fills a lot of holes & he's not a rental, hes got another year at 4 Mil on his deal.
The Jets have a Tone of Cap space.
The Jets are looking to get over the hump to get to the SC.
The picks are spread out over 2 years & will be what a 25th-30th & 50th -60th? Not like its top 10 picks being given up.
The Jets give up 1 roster player & hes 3rd /4th line player on that team.
16 janv. 2019 à 17 h 7
#8
Démarrer sujet
Skeating_sec224
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 628
Mentions "j'aime": 144
Quoting: DOTFAM
I'm just pointing out that with Burns/Karlsson/Braun all on the right side, I don't see how it makes sense to give up a young proven NHL forward in Labanc along with a top-50 prospect (according to Pronman's most recent rankings) in Chmelevski and the team's most recent 3rd rd pick for 2 rental players.


McQauid has a Stanley Cup Ring. GMs love bringing in guys that win. He'd be there for depth for a long cup run & can play RD or LD in the event of an injury on the 3rd pair.
Its basically Labanc for Zuccarello, again ZUC is a vet with a lot pf playoff experience on a big stage. GM's love that too.
SJ has no picks to really offer & those prospects are a far way from the NHL, the Sharks are in win now mode & are in a cap crunch, so with the retained money, thee guys are basically costing the Sharks nothing. GMs also love that.
DOTFAM a aimé ceci.
16 janv. 2019 à 17 h 11
#9
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,006
Mentions "j'aime": 2,595
Quoting: Skeating622
Curious what a Hayes to Jets deal would look like form a Jets fan perspective?
In this scenario the Jets keep their best prospect(s). (Kristian Vesalainen, Dylan Samberg, Appleton ...???)
Trade from a point of strength on the back end.
Get 2 top 6 forwards, Namemstikov fills a lot of holes & he's not a rental, hes got another year at 4 Mil on his deal.
The Jets have a Tone of Cap space.
The Jets are looking to get over the hump to get to the SC.
The picks are spread out over 2 years & will be what a 25th-30th & 50th -60th? Not like its top 10 picks being given up.
The Jets give up 1 roster player & hes 3rd /4th line player on that team.


We could potentially lose two D next year and a few Forwards. We need both those players. As for the cap, next year will be a challenge and we dont need a 4M 4th liner(cuz thats what he will be)
17 janv. 2019 à 13 h 57
#10
NY Rangers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 220
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: Skeating622
McQauid has a Stanley Cup Ring. GMs love bringing in guys that win. He'd be there for depth for a long cup run & can play RD or LD in the event of an injury on the 3rd pair.
Its basically Labanc for Zuccarello, again ZUC is a vet with a lot pf playoff experience on a big stage. GM's love that too.
SJ has no picks to really offer & those prospects are a far way from the NHL, the Sharks are in win now mode & are in a cap crunch, so with the retained money, thee guys are basically costing the Sharks nothing. GMs also love that.


Labanc is on pace for about 50 pts this year. They're not going to trade a younger, roster player for Zucc who is already putting up a similar amount of points Zucc has been known to put up. They might trade some other non-roster prospects, but contending teams don't trade well contributing roster guys.
DOTFAM a aimé ceci.
4 févr. 2019 à 11 h 36
#11
waveshavearrived
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: DOTFAM
Labanc is the most talented player in the trade and a full 8 years younger than Zuccarello. I don't see how the Sharks make this trade for 2 veteran rentals, 1 who is producing less than the core piece given up and the other who wouldn't even crack their 3 D-pairings. Why would the Sharks even want McQuaid?


Quoting: DOTFAM
Labanc is the most talented player in the trade and a full 8 years younger than Zuccarello. I don't see how the Sharks make this trade for 2 veteran rentals, 1 who is producing less than the core piece given up and the other who wouldn't even crack their 3 D-pairings. Why would the Sharks even want McQuaid?


I take everything back. Give me Zucc (1.75 mil retained) and a 3rd rd pick or Labanc straight up.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage