I like Keith and I think he would be good for this team, just not for 5 years. I think if they tried to flip him after 1 or 2 playoff it would be increasingly hard to trade him, taking up that precious cap space.

Keith is 35, there is no way TO makes this trade. Unfortunately, Keith is not going to bring nearly the haul you want him to bring in.

With the retained salary he is only making $3,538,889 and with the cap rising to $83,000,000 next year and probably higher a year after that it is cost certainty and a good price for the quality of player you are getting and the experience. Plus I think Keith at 39 or 40 making that will still be more effective than Hainsey is currently and we pay him $3,000,000

You guys really need to stop with this crap. What team in their right mind trades a budding young talent for an aging one!? Why would we give up 6 years of cost control on Sandin for 3 years of a defender that is NOTHING like he used to be.

There is a place for him on our a team, and a way to make it work. But it is not by trading our second best D prospect.

The time for keeping all prospects is gone when you have a window to win a cup now. Yes Sandin is a great prospect but he does not help MLSE at the NHL level this year or next which are the two best years to win a cup. Keith does.

You have to give something up to get something.

I dont think Toronto should make the trade, but your point has alot of merit.

People on here dramatically overvalue prospects and non 1st round draft picks.

You just picked a bad example with Keith.

????? Why is our window the next two years???

Our best players won’t even hit their prime for 3 more years.....

SANDIN IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE ANY TIME SOON. STOP THIS