SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Likley 2019 Hawks

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 6 déc. 2018
Publié: 6 déc. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
22 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Mitchell, Ian
3925 000 $
Krys, Chad
3925 000 $
Kakko, Kaapo
3925 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $55 855 961 $0 $6 632 500 $27 144 039 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Kakko, Kaapo
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Krys, Chad
925 000 $925 000 $
Mitchell, Ian
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
706 666 $706 666 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 déc. 2018 à 11 h 58
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,842
Mentions "j'aime": 10,064
That Defense is VERY weak. They need a veteran LD. Forsling doesn't deserve $2.25M. He barely deserves $1.5M. I would rather have Gus than Forsling to be honest. People can talk about how much they like Forsling's development, but then those same people turn around and find glaring holes in his game. Yes, he's young. Yes, those mistakes are rookie mistakes. Yes, I want to keep him in general, but NO he's not better than Gus right now. Evidence is that Gus actually plays LD while Forsling moves to RD because they just need to get him NHL ice time. Gus gets more minutes/is a better passer/and scores goals. Forsling isn't physical which is probably the most glaring part of his game so far. He can change that with experience though. He's not a lightweight, just needs to learn to use it.
6 déc. 2018 à 12 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 55
Mentions "j'aime": 2
This off-season presents a ton of opportunity for Chicago. Strong chance to land Panarin, etc. Clearing some cap is definitely in their best interest, good work
6 déc. 2018 à 12 h 47
#3
Chewbacca88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,184
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: exo2769
That Defense is VERY weak. They need a veteran LD. Forsling doesn't deserve $2.25M. He barely deserves $1.5M. I would rather have Gus than Forsling to be honest. People can talk about how much they like Forsling's development, but then those same people turn around and find glaring holes in his game. Yes, he's young. Yes, those mistakes are rookie mistakes. Yes, I want to keep him in general, but NO he's not better than Gus right now. Evidence is that Gus actually plays LD while Forsling moves to RD because they just need to get him NHL ice time. Gus gets more minutes/is a better passer/and scores goals. Forsling isn't physical which is probably the most glaring part of his game so far. He can change that with experience though. He's not a lightweight, just needs to learn to use it.


I completely disagree. I think the young defence is great. Jokiharju is their best defenceman this year. Who's to say Boqvist, Krys, Gilbert, etc won't be just as good?
6 déc. 2018 à 13 h 19
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,842
Mentions "j'aime": 10,064
Modifié 6 déc. 2018 à 13 h 45
Quoting: CrazyK04
I completely disagree. I think the young defence is great. Jokiharju is their best defenceman this year. Who's to say Boqvist, Krys, Gilbert, etc won't be just as good?


It's just the assumption that they're ALL going to be good because 1 of them is good...AND ALL in their Rookie years...is what I have a problem with. Getting (1) 1st round pick to be as good as Joki in his rookie year is F'ing amazing and VERY rare. Usually, Dmen take years to develp AND then when they do it's typically the rookies that have major supporting veteran Dmen around them. Go back and look at the drafts...even from Joki's year 2017. EIGHT different Dmen were drafted in front of him. Cale Maker, Miro Heiskanen, Callen Foote, Erik Brannstrom, Jusso Vallimaki, Timothy Liljegren, Urho Vaakanainen, Pierre-Olivier Joseph. Miro is the only other one playing let alone at this high level. It's just VERY unrealistic to think ALL of these guys are going to pan out...in their rookie years. Boqvist MIGHT be the exception because I would play him opposite Keith and allow Joki to graduate away from Keith. Boqvist will likely be the PP quarterback of the future anyway. But that's FAR from a guarantee too. Even 1st overall picks can flame out.
6 déc. 2018 à 16 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,319
Mentions "j'aime": 4,966
Quoting: exo2769
That Defense is VERY weak. They need a veteran LD. Forsling doesn't deserve $2.25M. He barely deserves $1.5M. I would rather have Gus than Forsling to be honest. People can talk about how much they like Forsling's development, but then those same people turn around and find glaring holes in his game. Yes, he's young. Yes, those mistakes are rookie mistakes. Yes, I want to keep him in general, but NO he's not better than Gus right now. Evidence is that Gus actually plays LD while Forsling moves to RD because they just need to get him NHL ice time. Gus gets more minutes/is a better passer/and scores goals. Forsling isn't physical which is probably the most glaring part of his game so far. He can change that with experience though. He's not a lightweight, just needs to learn to use it.


I wouldn't say the defence is weak it's just young. Jokiharju is having an amazing rookie season, kieth can still play, and if you would watch the games you would see Forsling has been our best defender most night (although that's not saying much)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage