SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Torontreottawa Maple Canadors

Créé par: Hedman77
Équipe: 2018-19 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 17 août 2018
Publié: 17 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ignore contracts
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2079 500 000 $99 439 643 $0 $4 060 000 $-19 939 643 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 8
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
DG
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 août 2018 à 11 h 3
#1
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,010
Mentions "j'aime": 2,595
Mete and Petry over gard and Zaitsev
17 août 2018 à 11 h 9
#2
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: dcc94
Mete and Petry over gard and Zaitsev


Petry over Zaitsev maybe, but definitely not Mete over Gardiner. And I am not a fan of Gardiner.
17 août 2018 à 11 h 19
#3
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,010
Mentions "j'aime": 2,595
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
Petry over Zaitsev maybe, but definitely not Mete over Gardiner. And I am not a fan of Gardiner.


Mete doesn't go -4 in the deciding playoff game...prob cuz he hasn't made it that far but still...smile
17 août 2018 à 11 h 23
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: dcc94
Mete and Petry over gard and Zaitsev

I agree on Petry. But no question Gardiner over Mete.

Disclaimer: Habs fan.
17 août 2018 à 11 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Having never played an NHL game, Tkachuk deserves no spot on this roster. Rielly is also the #1 LHD, not Chabot.
17 août 2018 à 11 h 28
#6
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: dcc94
Mete doesn't go -4 in the deciding playoff game...prob cuz he hasn't made it that far but still...smile


I'll take Gardiner in 88/89 games he played in this year over Mete. Gardiner obviously had one of the worst periods by a player of his caliber in a long time which may have cost his team the series, but you can't discount what he did the rest of the season because of it.

Mete: 49 GP, 0G, 7A, 7PTS
Gardiner: 82 GP, 5G, 47A, 52PTS

I don't think this should even be a discussion...
Jetman a aimé ceci.
17 août 2018 à 11 h 29
#7
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: Goldendelicious
Having never played an NHL game, Tkachuk deserves no spot on this roster. Rielly is also the #1 LHD, not Chabot.


Interested to know who you would take instead. I'd be really excited about Tkachuk on this team's fourth line, so much potential.
17 août 2018 à 11 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
I'll take Gardiner in 88/89 games he played in this year over Mete. Gardiner obviously had one of the worst periods by a player of his caliber in a long time which may have cost his team the series, but you can't discount what he did the rest of the season because of it.

Mete: 49 GP, 0G, 7A, 7PTS
Gardiner: 82 GP, 5G, 47A, 52PTS

I don't think this should even be a discussion...


Don't compare the stats of a rookie 19 year old defenceman who does not play an offensive style of game. Mete is better defensively, Gardiner is better offensively.
17 août 2018 à 11 h 52
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
Interested to know who you would take instead. I'd be really excited about Tkachuk on this team's fourth line, so much potential.


Picking strictly LW...Marleau. But really any of Marleau, Brown, Hyman to fill that 4th line role.
17 août 2018 à 12 h 48
#10
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: Goldendelicious
Picking strictly LW...Marleau. But really any of Marleau, Brown, Hyman to fill that 4th line role.


I guess it depends on how long this team is intended for. One game, I'd pick Marleau. This season, I'd pick Hyman. Anything more than that, I would pick Tkachuk without hesitation. There's no situation I would ever pick Brown over Tkachuk though.
17 août 2018 à 12 h 53
#11
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: Goldendelicious
Don't compare the stats of a rookie 19 year old defenceman who does not play an offensive style of game. Mete is better defensively, Gardiner is better offensively.


I was using those stats to make a point. I think it's pretty evident who the better player is. Other stats:
TOI: Mete; 15:35, Gardiner; 22:32
+/-: Mete; +5, Gardiner +9
Their Corsi for percentage is almost identical as well (50.1 vs. 50.7).

You can break it down basically any way you would like, Gardiner is the better player and there's really no arguing that.
17 août 2018 à 15 h 45
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 665
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
I was using those stats to make a point. I think it's pretty evident who the better player is. Other stats:
TOI: Mete; 15:35, Gardiner; 22:32
+/-: Mete; +5, Gardiner +9
Their Corsi for percentage is almost identical as well (50.1 vs. 50.7).

You can break it down basically any way you would like, Gardiner is the better player and there's really no arguing that.


If you go back to my original comment, you'll notice I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just stating the stats you originally highlighted are not overly relevant considering their playing styles and league experience.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage