SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just an idea

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2018-19 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 19 juill. 2018
Publié: 19 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not gonna happen, but is the value ok?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Eriksson, Loui (1 200 000 $ retained)
  2. Tanev, Christopher
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Forsling, Gustav
  2. Highmore, Matthew
  3. Murphy, Connor
  4. Seabrook, Brent
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
  6. Choix de 7e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
2.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $66 350 961 $1 232 500 $5 022 500 $13 149 039 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
C
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA
925 000 $925 000 $
D
UFA - 1
750 833 $750 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 juill. 2018 à 16 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
I said this before but if Bowman could have done things differently, Saad and Panarin could/should have been their top two LWers in ‘15-16. Saying that, tho, I would almost rather trade Saad and Anisimov as part of a big deal to land Karlsson. There would most likely be enough cap left to then extend EK as well as Schmaltz.
19 juill. 2018 à 16 h 53
#2
Sean Avery Bud
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 104
Mentions "j'aime": 23
take Tanev and the 2nd rounder off, and no retained salary on eriksson, and leave everything on the hawks side. then that would work.
graderman a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2018 à 16 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
Quoting: Latt_Mowery
take Tanev and the 2nd rounder off, and no retained salary on eriksson, and leave everything on the hawks side. then that would work.
Really! I admit, I know next to nothing about Chris Tanev. However, he seems to be a bit fragile or injury prone and not very product to say the least. Not to mention his cap hit is way too high to justify.
19 juill. 2018 à 17 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Quoting: Latt_Mowery
take Tanev and the 2nd rounder off, and no retained salary on eriksson, and leave everything on the hawks side. then that would work.


Dumping Seabrook's contract would never cost that much. His contract is arguably better than Eriksson's, and he has more value to the Hawks than Eriksson ever would.
19 juill. 2018 à 17 h 6
#5
Sean Avery Bud
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 104
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: graderman
Really! I admit, I know next to nothing about Chris Tanev. However, he seems to be a bit fragile or injury prone and not very product to say the least. Not to mention his cap hit is way too high to justify.


Quoting: bluedemon5
Dumping Seabrook's contract would never cost that much. His contract is arguably better than Eriksson's, and he has more value to the Hawks than Eriksson ever would.


everyone knows that hawks are in the weirdest spot, any deal pretty much at this point is gonna be a waaayyyyy over pay on the hawks part. sure, it may not bet as dirastic as i said, but it sure as sh*t feels like it at this point. bickel; had like 3 years left on his deal that was around 4 ish mil (i think) and it took tuevo and some change to get that contract off. sure, seabs isnt as bad as bickell. but that contract man, that contract is basically the black plague.
19 juill. 2018 à 17 h 11
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Quoting: Latt_Mowery
everyone knows that hawks are in the weirdest spot, any deal pretty much at this point is gonna be a waaayyyyy over pay on the hawks part. sure, it may not bet as dirastic as i said, but it sure as sh*t feels like it at this point. bickel; had like 3 years left on his deal that was around 4 ish mil (i think) and it took tuevo and some change to get that contract off. sure, seabs isnt as bad as bickell. but that contract man, that contract is basically the black plague.


Bickell + Teuvo got the Hawks a second round pick and a third round pick. Regardless, trading Seabrook and his $6.875M for Eriksson and his $6M contract would be such a joke. You only save 2 years because Eriksson's contract is shorter but he's also the inferior player. If the Hawks really wanted to get rid of Seabrook then they wouldn't bring back an equally horid deal, especially if they included propsects AND a first rounder. Makes no sense.
19 juill. 2018 à 17 h 12
#7
Sean Avery Bud
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 104
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: bluedemon5
Bickell + Teuvo got the Hawks a second round pick and a third round pick. Regardless, trading Seabrook and his $6.875M for Eriksson and his $6M contract would be such a joke. You only save 2 years because Eriksson's contract is shorter but he's also the inferior player. If the Hawks really wanted to get rid of Seabrook then they wouldn't bring back an equally horid deal, especially if they included propsects AND a first rounder. Makes no sense.


nothing ever makes sense
19 juill. 2018 à 17 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,729
Mentions "j'aime": 288
As long as Seabrook is playing top 2 minutes with the Hawks, that is a real problem at this stage. Eriksson, while being an inferior player, can at least be lost in a bottom six role or on the second PP unit. However, at $6M hit, that can’t be considered reason to want him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage