SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No one ever does Ducks AGM, lots of great prospects..but can they still compete?

Créé par: JP_knows_it_all
Équipe: 2018-19 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2018
Publié: 11 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I would ice this roster without hesitation. If they stay healthy, and that's a big IF, they have a good deep team that could give a hard time to any team in the league. They aren't getting any younger, though, but they have a lot of good young prospects in the pipeline (watch out for Sam Steel, this guy is a stud!). They should consider trading Henrique at the trade deadline because, even though they could afford to sign him in next summer, they would be very tight to the cap with Gibson and Silfverberg to resign and they have a lot of good yound centermen prospects to fill the void. I would expect a '19 2nd round pick + a prospect in return for Henrique. All in all, with the return of a healthy Eaves, a bounceback season from Kesler and a healthy team in general, they should still be a playoff team that could go deep if Gibson plays like he can, especially in the Pacific where you have SJS VGK (begginner's luck might be over this year) CGY & LAK as serious playoff teams (although I think it's more of a 3 man race between SJS VGK & ANA).

What do you guys think?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 650 000 $
63 900 000 $
1750 000 $
2725 000 $
2700 000 $
22 750 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $72 242 583 $0 $0 $7 257 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
680 000 $680 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 4
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2018 à 11 h 30
#1
Value Specialist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 7
I agree they are a playoff team in the pacific next season. I think the RFA signings are very reasonable, however they will probably want to give Montour a longer term after his great season last year. I also suspect Kesler will be 2C again if his hips are working and steel/henrique will battle for 3C spot. Could also see Steel starting on the RW somewhere. I also suspect Rakell will play LW and Eaves will play RW this season as that was where they mostly have been. Looking at this roster, the ducks are probably the most physical team in the league, will be interesting to watch their games and see if they can punish the speed/controlled entry play that has gotten so popular everywhere else.
JP_knows_it_all a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2018 à 11 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 64
I like all the signings except ritchie. Guy will never get nearly 4 mil. He cant put up more than 15 goals and 40 points. More likely he would get a 2 year somewhere in between $1-1.5 mil.
11 juill. 2018 à 12 h 5
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Ducksfan93
I like all the signings except ritchie. Guy will never get nearly 4 mil. He cant put up more than 15 goals and 40 points. More likely he would get a 2 year somewhere in between $1-1.5 mil.


We're talking about a long term deal here. He would not be given that type of money on a 2 year deal, at least not right now. That's a good signature for both party and the risks aren't that high for the team since it's a relatively low cap hit (3.3M$/year is the NHL average now). Still, he's a first round pick, big, physical, can score goals in dirty area...these are hard to find and almost always gets rewarded when the time comes. You say he can never put up more than 15 goals...he played only 2 full NHL seasons, he's only 22 years old with 186GP behind the belt, not even playing PP minutes yet, plays mostly on the 3rd line and still puts up those numbers.

ANA has two choices :
1) Sign a bridge deal at 2x2.3M$ or 3x2.9M$ (seach for same type of player and you find they all got around those numbers)
2) Take a small gamble and sign him long term 6-7 years at around 3.8-4M$ a year. (Again, search for similar players and you'll see for yourself)

And we all know that the Ducks loves to extend their players long term right after their ELC. History speaks for itself.
11 juill. 2018 à 12 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
I think the Ritchie and Kase contracts should be switched. Other than that, it looks pretty good.
12 juill. 2018 à 10 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 910
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: jp_harvey
We're talking about a long term deal here. He would not be given that type of money on a 2 year deal, at least not right now. That's a good signature for both party and the risks aren't that high for the team since it's a relatively low cap hit (3.3M$/year is the NHL average now). Still, he's a first round pick, big, physical, can score goals in dirty area...these are hard to find and almost always gets rewarded when the time comes. You say he can never put up more than 15 goals...he played only 2 full NHL seasons, he's only 22 years old with 186GP behind the belt, not even playing PP minutes yet, plays mostly on the 3rd line and still puts up those numbers.

ANA has two choices :
1) Sign a bridge deal at 2x2.3M$ or 3x2.9M$ (seach for same type of player and you find they all got around those numbers)
2) Take a small gamble and sign him long term 6-7 years at around 3.8-4M$ a year. (Again, search for similar players and you'll see for yourself)

And we all know that the Ducks loves to extend their players long term right after their ELC. History speaks for itself.


Wait a second here....are we watching the same Ducks team? Also, we aren't watching the same Nick Ritchie that you are talking about. The Nick Ritchie we see every game takes a dumb penalty in the offensive zone and then gets benched.

I would rather bring back Kevin Bieksa to play forward then bring back Ritchie for $3.9 a year...
Ducksfan93 a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2018 à 12 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: awatt
Wait a second here....are we watching the same Ducks team? Also, we aren't watching the same Nick Ritchie that you are talking about. The Nick Ritchie we see every game takes a dumb penalty in the offensive zone and then gets benched.

I would rather bring back Kevin Bieksa to play forward then bring back Ritchie for $3.9 a year...


This was exactly my point. Guy doesnt deserve more money than Rakell. At least Rakell was showing those promising signs before getting the best contract Steal of a lifetime) in Ducks history!!
awatt a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2018 à 23 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 1,664
Ritchie for $1.7M, Kase no higher than $2.5M.

Love how hot you are on the Ducks, but they have a few bloated contracts that are hurting them, and guys with dubious futures health wise. Perry looks like trash now. If he starts the season hot I’d ask him to waive that NMC and move him for anything at all. The Ducks are really going to need to rely on young guys coming up big this year if they want to have a chance
15 août 2018 à 21 h 23
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
I think the Ritchie and Kase contracts should be switched. Other than that, it looks pretty good.


Quoting: Jded
Ritchie for $1.7M, Kase no higher than $2.5M.

Love how hot you are on the Ducks, but they have a few bloated contracts that are hurting them, and guys with dubious futures health wise. Perry looks like trash now. If he starts the season hot I’d ask him to waive that NMC and move him for anything at all. The Ducks are really going to need to rely on young guys coming up big this year if they want to have a chance


Did you see O.Kase's contract signing today? 3 years at 2.6M$ AAV. I was at 3 years at 2.65M$ AAV in this thread posted 5 weeks ago. Can you say "spot on"?! ?
HockeyNM1510 a aimé ceci.
16 août 2018 à 3 h 55
#9
Ducks8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Nice post. I like most of it, but if Kesler is healthy I don't see him on the 4th line so Steel can play 3C. Ritchie should get a contract under 2mil for cap hit, 1 year or 2.
16 août 2018 à 18 h 4
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: jp_harvey
Did you see O.Kase's contract signing today? 3 years at 2.6M$ AAV. I was at 3 years at 2.65M$ AAV in this thread posted 5 weeks ago. Can you say "spot on"?! ?


Great call!
JP_knows_it_all a aimé ceci.
16 août 2018 à 18 h 13
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 1,664
Quoting: jp_harvey
Did you see O.Kase's contract signing today? 3 years at 2.6M$ AAV. I was at 3 years at 2.65M$ AAV in this thread posted 5 weeks ago. Can you say "spot on"?! ?


Very solid! That wasn’t the contract that was really in question though.. wait for the Ritchie signing and you’ll probably be humbled
16 août 2018 à 19 h 27
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Jded
Very solid! That wasn’t the contract that was really in question though.. wait for the Ritchie signing and you’ll probably be humbled


Yeah I think so too lol! But if they ever decide to go long term (6-7 years), that's should be in that ball park (between 3.5 & 3.75M$ AAV)?

Realisticly, though, 3 years at 2.4M$ AAV would be more in line with what he's worth.
16 août 2018 à 21 h 9
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 1,664
Quoting: jp_harvey
Yeah I think so too lol! But if they ever decide to go long term (6-7 years), that's should be in that ball park (between 3.5 & 3.75M$ AAV)?

Realisticly, though, 3 years at 2.4M$ AAV would be more in line with what he's worth.


I don’t think the Ducks would have any appetite to sign him to that kinda term with his performance last season. You don’t give a 10 goal scorer with a reckless streak $4M / year unless you’re the capitals signing Wilson at that +$1M for god knows what reason. He’s worth $2M for a couple more years to see what he can put together
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage