SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Panarin trade with Florida

Créé par: Jacketsman61
Équipe: 2018-19 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2018
Publié: 5 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Panarin agrees to an extension with Florida and the Jackets get a bunch of prospects and futures. Not really what Jarmo would like but it definitely helps.

The Jackets acquire Skinner to replace Panarin. Not as productive but still a goal scorer.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
44 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Borgström, Henrik
  2. Tippett, Owen
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Rights to Gregori Denisenko
FLA
  1. Panarin, Artemi
Détails additionnels:
Panarin signs an Extension
2.
CAR
  1. Milano, Sonny
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de FLA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2020
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2021
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2279 500 000 $65 914 999 $0 $4 200 000 $13 585 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 725 000 $5 725 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 7
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
C
UFA - 5
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
675 000 $675 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
7 425 000 $7 425 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 3
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
675 000 $675 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,038
Mentions "j'aime": 3,236
Would be very stupid of FLA to move 3 very very good young forward prospects for Panarin. But FLA is pretty stupid so maybe.
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,463
Mentions "j'aime": 964
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Would be very stupid of FLA to move 3 very very good young forward prospects for Panarin. But FLA is pretty stupid so maybe.


Panarin is Elite. They would be able to acquire him and sign him long term. This would definitely help Florida climb into discussion of contenders in the Atlantic division.
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 161
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Panarin is Elite. They would be able to acquire him and sign him long term. This would definitely help Florida climb into discussion of contenders in the Atlantic division.


he is elite but you are giving up 4 top 6 forwards potentially... this is not even close to fair
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 8
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,463
Mentions "j'aime": 964
Quoting: VoynovsParoleOfficerGuy
he is elite but you are giving up 4 top 6 forwards potentially... this is not even close to fair


Keyword is potentially. Again these are futures. For all we know Borgstrom could be nothing but a 3rd line center and Denisenko never comes over from Russia. Then who comes out on top?
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
if they had to give up that amount of guys why wouldn't they just trade for skinner if he was that much easier to get while not being quite as good when both are in the same contract situation?
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 23
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 3,022
Mentions "j'aime": 351
I love panarin. Underrated. Florida is also one of my favourite teams so i love this deal. No team would ever give up this much young talent though. And panarin is an expensive contract so some money will have to go the other way. Take out a young player or two here and put it in someone whos actually making nhl money.
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,017
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Like the thought, but I think Jackets have much less leverage than you believe. He has already expressed his desire to move to a big city, so why would a team pay so much to acquire him? I think given CBJ's desire to start acquiring young, developed talent to win now (or soon), it will be less pieces going back to CBJ, but ones that have already seen success at the NHL level (so for FLA for example, was thinking Bjugstad or Trochek if FLA is willing to part with them). I know that they will have a cap situation this coming offseason, but moving Panarin for established talent may help them solve that problem.
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,234
Mentions "j'aime": 615
Quoting: rja
Like the thought, but I think Jackets have much less leverage than you believe. He has already expressed his desire to move to a big city, so why would a team pay so much to acquire him? I think given CBJ's desire to start acquiring young, developed talent to win now (or soon), it will be less pieces going back to CBJ, but ones that have already seen success at the NHL level (so for FLA for example, was thinking Bjugstad or Trochek if FLA is willing to part with them). I know that they will have a cap situation this coming offseason, but moving Panarin for established talent may help them solve that problem.


Panthers won’t give CBJ three 1st rounder controllable assets. Bjugstad is available as part of a trade as well as 1st round picks but not the prospects.
5 juill. 2018 à 15 h 38
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,017
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Quoting: Kosterjr
Panthers won’t give CBJ three 1st rounder controllable assets. Bjugstad is available as part of a trade as well as 1st round picks but not the prospects.


Thanks Dale for clearing that up lol. But yeah I think Panarin for current NHL talent suits both sides better.
Kosterjr a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2018 à 22 h 41
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 8
I would say panarin and a 2019 conditional first round pick for barkov. The pick will only be a first if he signs long term. If not it becomes a 2019 second round pick. Win for both sides dynamic and a future asset for a dynamic young. Jarmon wants dynamic for dynamic and this may be the best your gonna get unless u can pry filip Forsberg from nashville
25 juill. 2018 à 18 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,234
Mentions "j'aime": 615
Quoting: smidget316
I would say panarin and a 2019 conditional first round pick for barkov. The pick will only be a first if he signs long term. If not it becomes a 2019 second round pick. Win for both sides dynamic and a future asset for a dynamic young. Jarmon wants dynamic for dynamic and this may be the best your gonna get unless u can pry filip Forsberg from nashville

Barkov isn’t available but he was it would cost way more than an extended Panarin
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage