SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Parayko to the Oilers-No Drai-Who Says No?

Créé par: Dwight_Schrute
Équipe: 2018-19 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 22 juin 2018
Publié: 22 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
STL gets a top 6 center which they desperately need, their D doesn't get to terribly much weaker with Klefbom stepping in and the Oilers FINALLY get their top pairing RHD.

Obviously in this situation the Oilers need more forwards, I signed to middle line free agents with the money freed up in the trade but they could also package the 10th and 29th to move up for one of Zadina, Tkachuk of Wahlstrom depending on how NHL ready the ladder is.

Could also stand more or less where they are for forwards depending on how much belief they have in Puljujarvi and or Yamamoto developing, Rattie staying at the level he was at the last quarter of the season, or Cagguila/Aberg being able to play in middle 6 roles.

Just thinking out loud basically, my question more so is would St. Louis consider this? Would the Oilers pay that much?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
84 250 000 $
23 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 333 333 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Parayko, Colton
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (STL)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (DET)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de EDM
Logo de STL
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de DET
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2179 500 000 $76 744 164 $0 $2 730 000 $2 755 836 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
UFA - 3
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 3
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 3
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juin 2018 à 8 h 2
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
And that’s terms for saying we will probably never trade Parayko to you.


Even if the Blues said McDavid, Chia isn't that dumb (or is he?) And will nonlonger negotiate. Blues would say Draisaitl for Parayko and work from there instead.
22 juin 2018 à 8 h 9
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Overpay is what has to happen if I give up Parayko. Kind of like Arizona I won’t give up Domi without overpay. And that is exactly what happened


According to Lou Korac in St. Louis, Parayko likely is not traded. I've been saying this for awhile, Blues don't offer Parayko unless it's a Seth Jones/Ryan Johansen type deal. Meaning, Draisaitl for Parayko pretty much straight up. Outside of that, he probably doesnt move him. Problem is Blues dont have the depth of defense that Nashville had. So it will take a higher grade C to pry Parayko for that reason alone. I don't see the Blues trading Petro and/or Parayko unless we bring in Carlson from Washington. Even then it's hard to imagine
22 juin 2018 à 10 h 39
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Chopper02
Even if the Blues said McDavid, Chia isn't that dumb (or is he?) And will nonlonger negotiate. Blues would say Draisaitl for Parayko and work from there instead.


Quoting: Chopper02
According to Lou Korac in St. Louis, Parayko likely is not traded. I've been saying this for awhile, Blues don't offer Parayko unless it's a Seth Jones/Ryan Johansen type deal. Meaning, Draisaitl for Parayko pretty much straight up. Outside of that, he probably doesnt move him. Problem is Blues dont have the depth of defense that Nashville had. So it will take a higher grade C to pry Parayko for that reason alone. I don't see the Blues trading Petro and/or Parayko unless we bring in Carlson from Washington. Even then it's hard to imagine

That is the meaning that we won’t basically trade him to edm unless it’s an amazing offer. And McDavid is pretty much to only thing Blues fans will settle for. And that means Edmonton would end negotiations and that means we don’t deal out Parayko
22 juin 2018 à 10 h 47
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
That is the meaning that we won’t basically trade him to edm unless it’s an amazing offer. And McDavid is pretty much to only thing Blues fans will settle for. And that means Edmonton would end negotiations and that means we don’t deal out Parayko


Blues fans would love Draisaitl just as much.
22 juin 2018 à 10 h 49
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Chopper02
Blues fans would love Draisaitl just as much.

Yea for Pietrangelo. Not for parayko
22 juin 2018 à 10 h 50
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Yea for Pietrangelo. Not for parayko


Trading Parayko to you mind as well start the rebuild. Now if trade Pietrangelo to you it’s different.
22 juin 2018 à 10 h 57
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,301
Mentions "j'aime": 1,512
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Yea for Pietrangelo. Not for parayko


Would a trade based around Nylander-Pietrangelo work for St. Louis? AP's next contract would jive nicely with when Marleau/Martin comes off our books and his current $6.5 is in the ballpark of what Nylander is likely to get this summer.
22 juin 2018 à 10 h 58
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Juice
Would a trade based around Nylander-Pietrangelo work for St. Louis? AP's next contract would jive nicely with when Marleau/Martin comes off our books and his current $6.5 is in the ballpark of what Nylander is likely to get this summer.


I think that would work as well
Juice a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 0
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,301
Mentions "j'aime": 1,512
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I think that would work as well


Straight up or would leafs need to add?
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 3
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Juice
Straight up or would leafs need to add?


Pietrangelo was 9th in the running for Norris.
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 6
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,301
Mentions "j'aime": 1,512
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Pietrangelo was 9th in the running for Norris.


Ya but Nylander got votes for the lady bing....so there's that...haha

Just trying to gauge what you deem to be fair...I like hearing what fans on the other side of a trade would want
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 21
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Trading Parayko to you mind as well start the rebuild. Now if trade Pietrangelo to you it’s different.


I'm a Blues fan to start. So not sure why you're saying "Parayko to you". I love Parayko, and would love to keep him. but Petro is a top 10 defenseman in the league. Why give that up? We could extend him in a year, and he's just now in his prime. Parayko is good and will be great, but we're trying to win now and keep the future in tact as well. with the looming expansion draft it makes sense to hold onto Petro and keep Dunn and Edmundson.
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 34
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Juice
Ya but Nylander got votes for the lady bing....so there's that...haha

Just trying to gauge what you deem to be fair...I like hearing what fans on the other side of a trade would want


Quoting: Chopper02
I'm a Blues fan to start. So not sure why you're saying "Parayko to you". I love Parayko, and would love to keep him. but Petro is a top 10 defenseman in the league. Why give that up? We could extend him in a year, and he's just now in his prime. Parayko is good and will be great, but we're trying to win now and keep the future in tact as well. with the looming expansion draft it makes sense to hold onto Petro and keep Dunn and Edmundson.


Well it’s more of an example being Armstrong. Just a habit. And Parayko is future for us. I know we need a overpayment to get Parayko from us and I simply think Edmonton won’t trade unless they can fleece and they can’t do that with Parayko I know they like Parayko but like I said before the only way we would ever trade Parayko to Edmonton Edmonton has to offer McDavid and then we will trade Parayko which means that will never happen because Edm won’t simply trade for McDavid
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 36
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Well it’s more of an example being Armstrong. Just a habit. And Parayko is future for us. I know we need a overpayment to get Parayko from us and I simply think Edmonton won’t trade unless they can fleece and they can’t do that with Parayko I know they like Parayko but like I said before the only way we would ever trade Parayko to Edmonton Edmonton has to offer McDavid and then we will trade Parayko which means that will never happen because Edm won’t simply trade for McDavid


i wholeheartedly disagree because as good as Parayko is, he's not untouchable especially if we can bring in a guy like Draisaitl. We won't trade for Klefbom+10th like i've seen Edmonton fans do. That just won't happen. You honestly wouldn't want Draisaitl?
22 juin 2018 à 11 h 54
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Chopper02
i wholeheartedly disagree because as good as Parayko is, he's not untouchable especially if we can bring in a guy like Draisaitl. We won't trade for Klefbom+10th like i've seen Edmonton fans do. That just won't happen. You honestly wouldn't want Draisaitl?


Well most of Edmonton fans say they will only give up RNH and well that means he is untouchable.
22 juin 2018 à 12 h 14
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Well most of Edmonton fans say they will only give up RNH and well that means he is untouchable.


But you're saying you'd only hear a trade for Parayko if it starts with McDavid. Meet in the middle and you have yourself a Draisaitl deal. That being said, I don't see it happening. I think Edmonton would rather move Klefbom out with the 10th for a RHD. Would Ottawa bite and send over Karlsson as long as there is a sign and trade?
22 juin 2018 à 12 h 50
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Chopper02
But you're saying you'd only hear a trade for Parayko if it starts with McDavid. Meet in the middle and you have yourself a Draisaitl deal. That being said, I don't see it happening. I think Edmonton would rather move Klefbom out with the 10th for a RHD. Would Ottawa bite and send over Karlsson as long as there is a sign and trade?


I think Ottawa would want more, but I think EK would waive his clause
22 juin 2018 à 12 h 56
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
I think Ottawa would want more, but I think EK would waive his clause


To play with McDavid, i would say he probably would. It would take more if it's a sign and trade, but it's a start.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage