Math and Sports
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 650
Mentions "j'aime": 162
I'd like to see this trade happen one year down the road. As it is, the LAK don't look like they'll change much in a year, and I'd still rather find out what Roslovic turns into before we pull the trigger on one of our top 6 pieces.
That dude has gone and had an identical AHL career to Claude Giroux and his NHL numbers have been crazy. Scoring at a rate of 1.9P/60 is absurdly good for a guy who played bottom 6 minutes with little to no powerplay time last year. Like 1st line good if we didn't have one Mark Scheifele already stapled to that spot.
I love a good prospect, but if Vilardi's upside is as an elite 2C, he's probably 2 or more years from hitting that potential, and we have a prospect whose upside is also as an elite 2C but is further down the line in his development having played two pro seasons now, I'd use the leverage we have and hold out a year to make 100% sure we know what Roslovic projects as before we trade for a role we might already have.