SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

fun times

Créé par: nomad
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2018
Publié: 14 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Flames trade from a position of strength (Their D) to strengthen their Top 6. They take on more salary as part of the payment, and lose some decent pieces, but overall they improve and make room on the backend for Rasmus / Valmaki to make a push.

For the Buffalo trade, I added Scandella, but Bagosian could replace him depending on what Buffalo wanted to do.

On the 2nd line, RoR and Jankowski are interchagable between RW and C. Bennett playing with Backs is a good move I think, as it will help him get his confidence back. Him and Jankowski could flip on lines 2-3 as the season moves along depending on how they are playing.

Flames D is definitely weaker, but the hope is that Kulak continues to take steps forward and Rasmus lives up to hype and the flashes he has shown. Signing someone like Thomas Hickey could also sure up the D a bit, but I want to leave a spot for the Rookies to compete for.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
31 250 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. O'Reilly, Ryan
  2. Scandella, Marco
Détails additionnels:
Big money savings for Buffalo, while upgrading their D. Ferland is no OReilly, but he can play top line minutes. Probably best as a 4-9 forward.
BUF
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Ferland, Micheal
Détails additionnels:
Flames upgrade their top 6 and get a 3rd pairing d. They take on salary as part of the payment for OReilly.
2.
CGY
  1. Hoffman, Mike
Détails additionnels:
Ottawa unloads Hoffman, though his value has dropped after the issues around his GF. Ottawa drops salary.
OTT
  1. Hathaway, Garnet
  2. Stone, Michael
Détails additionnels:
Stone brothers are reunited and Ottawa gets a 4-7 defender and a bottom 6 forward with energy and lots of heart.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2380 000 000 $61 734 643 $0 $1 852 500 $18 265 357 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 5
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
705 000 $705 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin 2018 à 10 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 421
Mentions "j'aime": 41
i think you need to add value to get back the players you're looking for, Brodie and Ferland may not even be enough to get ROR.
I highly doubt Hoffman is going to be given away for a bottom pair defender and a 13th forward.
Nylander29 a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2018 à 12 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Mardzy
i think you need to add value to get back the players you're looking for, Brodie and Ferland may not even be enough to get ROR.
I highly doubt Hoffman is going to be given away for a bottom pair defender and a 13th forward.


Brodie & Ferland is overpayment for ROR, hence the added player. Let’s see 2C for 2/3D & 1RW? Hoffman may not get even that if he is involved, the situation is in flux.
14 juin 2018 à 12 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 421
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: cberg
Brodie & Ferland is overpayment for ROR, hence the added player. Let’s see 2C for 2/3D & 1RW? Hoffman may not get even that if he is involved, the situation is in flux.


O'Reilly produces and plays solid defence while having a terrible supporting cast.
Brodie showed last year what happens when he's not paired with Giordano. He and Hamoniv were not very good at all together.
Ferland was someone for Gaudreau to bounce a puck of off into the net, a 3rd line winger on an average team, 4th line on a deep team.
14 juin 2018 à 13 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Mardzy
O'Reilly produces and plays solid defence while having a terrible supporting cast.
Brodie showed last year what happens when he's not paired with Giordano. He and Hamoniv were not very good at all together.
Ferland was someone for Gaudreau to bounce a puck of off into the net, a 3rd line winger on an average team, 4th line on a deep team.


Hopefully you are getting a bunch of comic relief from your comments, cause they sure are funny. Ferland actually has a great shot, is fast and physical. Brodie had an off year, offensively but still plays over 21 minutes a night against top competition. People act like ROR is the second coming of Malkin, or something. He isn’t. He led the NHL in faceoff %, which is terrific, but otherwise he’s a very good, but not great C. He also tends to over-value his own worth and gets into fights with management. Finally, his comments this past Spring was a plea to be traded. I would like him, but not at any cost.
14 juin 2018 à 14 h 28
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 421
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Modifié 14 juin 2018 à 14 h 37
Quoting: cberg
Hopefully you are getting a bunch of comic relief from your comments, cause they sure are funny. Ferland actually has a great shot, is fast and physical. Brodie had an off year, offensively but still plays over 21 minutes a night against top competition. People act like ROR is the second coming of Malkin, or something. He isn’t. He led the NHL in faceoff %, which is terrific, but otherwise he’s a very good, but not great C. He also tends to over-value his own worth and gets into fights with management. Finally, his comments this past Spring was a plea to be traded. I would like him, but not at any cost.


I understand you're a Flames fan.
I have nothing against Brodie. I actually like him, as he grew up not too far away from me and I've spent some time with him.
His corsi stats last year were not great. He's -32 over the last two seasons. So it seems he's having a hard time against that top competition.
The flames have one won 5 playoff games since Brodie has been a flame. If he's supposed to be one of their best, and the team isn't consistently making it into the playoffs or winning playoffs series then to me this says he may be an average defender that paired very well with an elite defender.
14 juin 2018 à 14 h 52
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,232
Mentions "j'aime": 401
That BUF deal is a conversation starter for sure, but I think the Flames end up having to add to get it done. Brodie + Bennett + a prospect is definitely close though.

Hoffman deal is a tougher one to understand value on with the recent news. I think GMs are going to wait a little while to see what transpires in the media and make Dorion sweat a bit longer before trying to add the player to their dressing room.

+ If CGY ever got O'Reilly, you can be very, very, very sure that he will be playing center. He's the best faceoff man in the league by a good margin. He's taken more draws than anyone over the past 3 seasons and still has a 58% win percentage. Better than Bergeron on both metrics...that's the most elite of the elite on draws. Jankowski isn't pushing him out of the circle.

With the trades you've made, I think the lineup would be:

Gaudreau / Monahan / Hoffman
Tkachuk / O'Reilly / Foo
Bennett / Backlund / Frolik
*depth guy* / Jankowski / Shore

*Mangiapane, Dube, Lomberg
cberg a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2018 à 17 h 19
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Mardzy
I understand you're a Flames fan.
I have nothing against Brodie. I actually like him, as he grew up not too far away from me and I've spent some time with him.
His corsi stats last year were not great. He's -32 over the last two seasons. So it seems he's having a hard time against that top competition.
The flames have one won 5 playoff games since Brodie has been a flame. If he's supposed to be one of their best, and the team isn't consistently making it into the playoffs or winning playoffs series then to me this says he may be an average defender that paired very well with an elite defender.


Thanks cool that you know him. I don’t put too much faith in +/- as there are too many other factors that influence the numbers. If you do, hey we could substitute someone like, say, Kulak in his place. Much better +/-....... I would agree with you that Giordano is an elite defender. As for Brodie there is an ongoing discussion as to whether his numbers drop-off is due to not playing with Gio, or being forced to play the LD side versus his preferred RD side. Three years ago when the Flames went to the playoffs with Gio injured and Brodie carrying the team, we saw that it was not necessarily Gio. In addition he has been dealing with some personal issues (sick wife,baby) but I anticipate with those past him he should get back on track. If he does not get traded the new coach has indicated he may get a chance on the right side so I guess we will see. In any case, the Flames reasons for considering a trade is they have several high-end D prospects but no room, while at the same time needing to strengthen RW and get some right shots. We’ll see what happens.
14 juin 2018 à 17 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: Vanderm
That BUF deal is a conversation starter for sure, but I think the Flames end up having to add to get it done. Brodie + Bennett + a prospect is definitely close though.

Hoffman deal is a tougher one to understand value on with the recent news. I think GMs are going to wait a little while to see what transpires in the media and make Dorion sweat a bit longer before trying to add the player to their dressing room.

+ If CGY ever got O'Reilly, you can be very, very, very sure that he will be playing center. He's the best faceoff man in the league by a good margin. He's taken more draws than anyone over the past 3 seasons and still has a 58% win percentage. Better than Bergeron on both metrics...that's the most elite of the elite on draws. Jankowski isn't pushing him out of the circle.

With the trades you've made, I think the lineup would be:

Gaudreau / Monahan / Hoffman
Tkachuk / O'Reilly / Foo
Bennett / Backlund / Frolik
*depth guy* / Jankowski / Shore

*Mangiapane, Dube, Lomberg



I’d probably put Jankowski at 2RW, or maybe have him & ROR switch with ROR taking the draws. The fourth line would probably be Mangiapane, Dube/Shore, Foo/Lomberg.
18 juin 2018 à 17 h 23
#9
Démarrer sujet
Flames Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Mardzy
i think you need to add value to get back the players you're looking for, Brodie and Ferland may not even be enough to get ROR.
I highly doubt Hoffman is going to be given away for a bottom pair defender and a 13th forward.


For the O'Reilly deal, I can see where you are coming from, since ROR is a great player. Scandella is added as a cap dump for BUF (so assuming neutral to negative value for him). I think Brodie and Ferland are close in terms of value, but there might need to be a bit of an add from Calgary.

For Hoffman, I actually think given the current environment this is pretty decent. In fact I'm hesitant as a Flames fan to pull the trigger. Will be interesting to see how it plays out - no matter what happens though it's a very unfortunate situation for the Karlsson's.
18 juin 2018 à 17 h 28
#10
Démarrer sujet
Flames Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Vanderm
That BUF deal is a conversation starter for sure, but I think the Flames end up having to add to get it done. Brodie + Bennett + a prospect is definitely close though.

Hoffman deal is a tougher one to understand value on with the recent news. I think GMs are going to wait a little while to see what transpires in the media and make Dorion sweat a bit longer before trying to add the player to their dressing room.

+ If CGY ever got O'Reilly, you can be very, very, very sure that he will be playing center. He's the best faceoff man in the league by a good margin. He's taken more draws than anyone over the past 3 seasons and still has a 58% win percentage. Better than Bergeron on both metrics...that's the most elite of the elite on draws. Jankowski isn't pushing him out of the circle.

With the trades you've made, I think the lineup would be:

Gaudreau / Monahan / Hoffman
Tkachuk / O'Reilly / Foo
Bennett / Backlund / Frolik
*depth guy* / Jankowski / Shore

*Mangiapane, Dube, Lomberg


Not ready to give up on Bennett yet and I think the Flames have the pieces to get the deal done without him being included. Ferland was more effective than Bennett last year and brings a lot to a team, while Brodie could use a change of scenery (and the opportunity to play on the right side again). Taking on Scandella's contract is part of the deal as well. If needed, a pick / prospect could be included (not one of the D prospects though or Dube / Parsons).

I totally agree on the ROR center comment. I actually make that point in the details section, that Him and Janko would be interchangable, with Janko even sliding down and Bennett coming up as a possibility. I like the options that having ROR creates for Peter's and would definitely make him a target this off-season if I was Tre.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage