SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Surviving with an overpaid roster

Créé par: NucksFanForLife
Équipe: 2018-19 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 30 mai 2018
Publié: 30 mai 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
67 500 000 $
Transactions
CAR
  1. Orpik, Brooks (2 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Rights to Philipp Grubauer
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de WSH
Logo de FLA
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2019
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2020
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2480 000 000 $69 871 378 $82 500 $1 950 000 $10 128 622 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
UFA - 7
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AG
UFA - 1
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 5
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 4
833 750 $833 750 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
G
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 mai 2018 à 9 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 752
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Good hockey deal!
bixyboii a aimé ceci.
30 mai 2018 à 9 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 235
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Why would Carlson sign for only six years? The team that drafted him can offer him up to an 8-year deal, so if you want him at 6 years then he'll be asking for 8-8.5 million AAV instead...
bixyboii a aimé ceci.
30 mai 2018 à 10 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 186
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Good deal but I also think you should've dont 8 years
30 mai 2018 à 10 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,018
Mentions "j'aime": 3,227
Caps pass. They already have too many LHD. They need picks for Grubauer.
30 mai 2018 à 10 h 52
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Eight years is probably what will happen. Six years is more ideal, and it's basically a best situation contract because he can get more ice time on Washington than on other contending teams like Vegas or Toronto. Both of those teams have other defensemen who already play a lot of minutes. Vegas plays all defensemen around twenty minutes a night, and Carlson probably couldn't get more than 22 on average there. Toronto relies on both PP units so there would be less PP time for Carlson plus Gardiner and Rielly play a lot of minutes so again Carlson couldn't get as much ice time. I see your point, but I'm hoping that Carlson will agree for less because Washington offers him a lot more than other teams. It's not a breaking point. If Carlson wants 8 years I'd give him 8 years. He's too good to let go.
30 mai 2018 à 11 h 1
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Caps pass. They already have too many LHD. They need picks for Grubauer.


With Orpik gone and letting Jerabek go, they'd be down to Kempny, Djoos, Orlov, Johansen, and Fleury. When Kempny's contract is up or he is outplayed by Djoos, Johansen, or Fleury, let him go and let the two best of those three play. Carolina seems like a too perfect place for Orpik and Grubauer, and Fleury or Bean is what they'd get in return on the blue line. A scoring prospect would be good too. Any suggestions?
30 mai 2018 à 11 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,018
Mentions "j'aime": 3,227
Modifié 30 mai 2018 à 11 h 15
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
With Orpik gone and letting Jerabek go, they'd be down to Kempny, Djoos, Orlov, Johansen, and Fleury. When Kempny's contract is up or he is outplayed by Djoos, Johansen, or Fleury, let him go and let the two best of those three play. Carolina seems like a too perfect place for Orpik and Grubauer, and Fleury or Bean is what they'd get in return on the blue line. A scoring prospect would be good too. Any suggestions?


So we trade a great young goalie for a #7 dman? Pass. I'll take Djoos and Johansen over him. But if Bean was involved then maybe, because he's worth the investment. But still, think Caps will want a 1st or at least two 2nds in return. I'd have to look at CAR other prospects to see if they would be worth taking over picks. What about Gautheir or Roy? Think those would be the only guys Caps would be interested in. If not, then a 1st (if you get another one via trade) or two 2nds.
30 mai 2018 à 11 h 26
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: ClockReads2113
So we trade a great young goalie for a #7 dman? Pass. I'll take Djoos and Johansen over him. But if Bean was involved then maybe, because he's worth the investment. But still, think Caps will want a 1st or at least two 2nds in return. I'd have to look at CAR other prospects to see if they would be worth taking over picks. What about Gautheir or Roy? Think those would be the only guys Caps would be interested in. If not, then a 1st (if you get another one via trade) or two 2nds.



Gauthier and Roy would be awesome. I guess why I had a low return was because Orpik is mostly cap dump and Washington can't really afford Grubauer's contract. Also, Samsonov is the future starter in my opinion, not Grubauer, but that could change.
ClockReads2113 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage