SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Stormbraining: Best center depth in the league...ever??

Créé par: The_Architect
Équipe: 2017-18 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 28 avr. 2018
Publié: 28 avr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
Tavares, John
711 000 000 $
Carlson, John
78 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Weber, Shea
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (MTL)
2.
MTL
  1. Karlsson, Erik
  2. Ryan, Bobby (2 000 000 $ retained)
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
Rights to Jake Evans and Will Bitten
3.
WSH
  1. Petry, Jeff
Détails additionnels:
Sam Poehling
4.
5.
6.
7.
MTL
  1. O'Reilly, Ryan (1 000 000 $ retained)
BUF
  1. Drouin, Jonathan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (WPG)
8.
STL
  1. Pacioretty, Max (1 000 000 $ retained)
9.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 000 000 $65 635 830 $0 $3 290 000 $13 364 170 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Tavares, John
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
753 333 $753 333 $ (Bonis de performance207 500 $$208K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
875 000 $875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
772 500 $772 500 $
AD
UFA - 4
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 1
894 166 $894 166 $
AD
UFA - 4
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 3
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Carlson, John
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
748 333 $748 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $
DD
UFA - 3
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 avr. 2018 à 22 h 21
#26
habs_fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,932
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Quoting: The_Architect
No he didn't but it was far from a beating


LOL
28 avr. 2018 à 22 h 34
#27
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: habs_fan123
LOL


Just to be clear, Chara didn't beat Anderson. Chara kinda slipped and as he was falling he brought Anderson down with him and somehow Chara ended up on top of him
29 avr. 2018 à 0 h 4
#28
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 7,256
Mentions "j'aime": 3,684
Mentioned it already in another armchair GM that featured that Jackets trade, but it works for the Jackets just fine.
29 avr. 2018 à 12 h 55
#29
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: ClockReads2113
WSH could get a way better return than a 30yo 2nd pairing dman and a middle 6 center prospect. They'll want Galchenyuk in return.


I'll do that. But I'll ask for a future conditional pick if Backstrom doesn't resign in 2 yrs.
ClockReads2113 a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2018 à 16 h 59
#30
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Modifié 29 avr. 2018 à 17 h 20
I think Backstrom has overperformed for a top five pick. Poehling is hard to judge against other late first round picks because so few historically have gone on to college. In his Sophomore year, Poehling has about a point a game against children. Nick Backstrom has only fallen below sixty points in three of his eleven NHL seasons. None of them were in the last five years. I assumed it was clear that I clicked like because, by claiming you would "trick" the Capitals into taking a salary dump for Nick Backstrom, you had acknowledged that this post was a joke. But then you're acting like it's serious:

Quoting: The_Architect
Really?? I just can't see giving up much more for a 30 yr old C with 2 years left on his contract and risking losing him to free agency


For a comparable proven two way star with two years left at a reasonable cap hit, I'd compare him to McDonagh. He fetched a 25 year old 20 goal scorer, two top prospects, and two late first round picks. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nhl/2018/02/26/rangers-trade-ryan-mcdonagh-to-tampa-in-blockbuster-deal/110875328/

On the other hand, McDonagh has been the Rangers' top scoring defenseman many times, but never pushed up the leaderboard beyond that. Backstrom has had a hundred points in a season, over seventy in each of the last five years, and 86 two years ago. That was the second time Backstrom finished top ten in voting for both the Selke and Hart trophies.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/backsni02.html

McDonagh finished top ten in Norris voting once, in 2013-14. He's a year younger but much further removed from being a dominant player at his position, and has never received a vote for the Hart trophy, so he's probably never been thought of as a dominant player in the entire NHL. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mcdonry01.html

So let me help you understand how to sort this out: you were joking, after all.
29 avr. 2018 à 17 h 4
#31
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
I'll do that. But I'll ask for a future conditional pick if Backstrom doesn't resign in 2 yrs.


No.

Not straight up for Galchenyuk.

Not close.

Galchenyuk has broken fifty points (barely) twice in six NHL seasons: https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/galchal01.html

Backstrom has scored fewer than fifty points (barely) twice in eleven NHL seasons: https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/backsni02.html

Galchenyuk, 2018 1st, Juulsen, Poehling. Or explain how being one year older than McDonagh makes up for how much better Backstrom is than McDonagh.
29 avr. 2018 à 17 h 18
#32
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Okay, yes, Galchenyuk had a 30 goal season, while Namestnikov in the trade of comparable recent age and term, only had 22 this year. It's not like the Caps are hurting for goal scoring wingers, but feel free to swap him out for Lehkonen, and add a pick.

This year Galchenyuk had ten even strength goals, tied for 3rd on the Habs. The Caps had two guys with that many this year. They also had eight guys with more. https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/WSH/2018.html

Galchenyuk consistently starts 60% of his shifts in the offensive zone, gets even corsi, and plays 15 to 16 minutes a night. If he clicks with a center like Backstrom on the Caps, then.... oh wait.... so, no.

If this were part of some amazing and absurd scenario where the Caps get Tavares (maybe in a joint sign and trade for Carlson?) and then trade Ovechkin for cap relief and need cheap scoring depth on the wings, then Galchenyuk could be tempting. Otherwise, this year, Gallagher scored twice as many goals at evens as Galchenyuk. Since the Caps don't have a ton of available spots on their power play, he'd be a lot more valuable to them.
29 avr. 2018 à 18 h 22
#33
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
I think Backstrom has overperformed for a top five pick. Poehling is hard to judge against other late first round picks because so few historically have gone on to college. In his Sophomore year, Poehling has about a point a game against children. Nick Backstrom has only fallen below sixty points in three of his eleven NHL seasons. None of them were in the last five years. I assumed it was clear that I clicked like because, by claiming you would "trick" the Capitals into taking a salary dump for Nick Backstrom, you had acknowledged that this post was a joke. But then you're acting like it's serious:



For a comparable proven two way star with two years left at a reasonable cap hit, I'd compare him to McDonagh. He fetched a 25 year old 20 goal scorer, two top prospects, and two late first round picks. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nhl/2018/02/26/rangers-trade-ryan-mcdonagh-to-tampa-in-blockbuster-deal/110875328/

On the other hand, McDonagh has been the Rangers' top scoring defenseman many times, but never pushed up the leaderboard beyond that. Backstrom has had a hundred points in a season, over seventy in each of the last five years, and 86 two years ago. That was the second time Backstrom finished top ten in voting for both the Selke and Hart trophies.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/backsni02.html

McDonagh finished top ten in Norris voting once, in 2013-14. He's a year younger but much further removed from being a dominant player at his position, and has never received a vote for the Hart trophy, so he's probably never been thought of as a dominant player in the entire NHL. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mcdonry01.html

So let me help you understand how to sort this out: you were joking, after all.


Would you have given up a 1st 2nd 3rd for Tomas Tatar?
29 avr. 2018 à 18 h 22
#34
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
I think Backstrom has overperformed for a top five pick. Poehling is hard to judge against other late first round picks because so few historically have gone on to college. In his Sophomore year, Poehling has about a point a game against children. Nick Backstrom has only fallen below sixty points in three of his eleven NHL seasons. None of them were in the last five years. I assumed it was clear that I clicked like because, by claiming you would "trick" the Capitals into taking a salary dump for Nick Backstrom, you had acknowledged that this post was a joke. But then you're acting like it's serious:



For a comparable proven two way star with two years left at a reasonable cap hit, I'd compare him to McDonagh. He fetched a 25 year old 20 goal scorer, two top prospects, and two late first round picks. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nhl/2018/02/26/rangers-trade-ryan-mcdonagh-to-tampa-in-blockbuster-deal/110875328/

On the other hand, McDonagh has been the Rangers' top scoring defenseman many times, but never pushed up the leaderboard beyond that. Backstrom has had a hundred points in a season, over seventy in each of the last five years, and 86 two years ago. That was the second time Backstrom finished top ten in voting for both the Selke and Hart trophies.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/backsni02.html

McDonagh finished top ten in Norris voting once, in 2013-14. He's a year younger but much further removed from being a dominant player at his position, and has never received a vote for the Hart trophy, so he's probably never been thought of as a dominant player in the entire NHL. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mcdonry01.html

So let me help you understand how to sort this out: you were joking, after all.


Would you have given up a 1st 2nd 3rd for Tomas Tatar?
29 avr. 2018 à 18 h 22
#35
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
I think Backstrom has overperformed for a top five pick. Poehling is hard to judge against other late first round picks because so few historically have gone on to college. In his Sophomore year, Poehling has about a point a game against children. Nick Backstrom has only fallen below sixty points in three of his eleven NHL seasons. None of them were in the last five years. I assumed it was clear that I clicked like because, by claiming you would "trick" the Capitals into taking a salary dump for Nick Backstrom, you had acknowledged that this post was a joke. But then you're acting like it's serious:



For a comparable proven two way star with two years left at a reasonable cap hit, I'd compare him to McDonagh. He fetched a 25 year old 20 goal scorer, two top prospects, and two late first round picks. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nhl/2018/02/26/rangers-trade-ryan-mcdonagh-to-tampa-in-blockbuster-deal/110875328/

On the other hand, McDonagh has been the Rangers' top scoring defenseman many times, but never pushed up the leaderboard beyond that. Backstrom has had a hundred points in a season, over seventy in each of the last five years, and 86 two years ago. That was the second time Backstrom finished top ten in voting for both the Selke and Hart trophies.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/backsni02.html

McDonagh finished top ten in Norris voting once, in 2013-14. He's a year younger but much further removed from being a dominant player at his position, and has never received a vote for the Hart trophy, so he's probably never been thought of as a dominant player in the entire NHL. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mcdonry01.html

So let me help you understand how to sort this out: you were joking, after all.


Would you have given up a 1st 2nd 3rd for Tomas Tatar?
29 avr. 2018 à 18 h 24
#36
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: The_Architect
Would you have given up a 1st 2nd 3rd for Tomas Tatar?


Sorry for the spam, it was unintended
Eli a aimé ceci.
29 avr. 2018 à 19 h 0
#37
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
I think Backstrom has overperformed for a top five pick. Poehling is hard to judge against other late first round picks because so few historically have gone on to college. In his Sophomore year, Poehling has about a point a game against children. Nick Backstrom has only fallen below sixty points in three of his eleven NHL seasons. None of them were in the last five years. I assumed it was clear that I clicked like because, by claiming you would "trick" the Capitals into taking a salary dump for Nick Backstrom, you had acknowledged that this post was a joke. But then you're acting like it's serious:



For a comparable proven two way star with two years left at a reasonable cap hit, I'd compare him to McDonagh. He fetched a 25 year old 20 goal scorer, two top prospects, and two late first round picks. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nhl/2018/02/26/rangers-trade-ryan-mcdonagh-to-tampa-in-blockbuster-deal/110875328/

On the other hand, McDonagh has been the Rangers' top scoring defenseman many times, but never pushed up the leaderboard beyond that. Backstrom has had a hundred points in a season, over seventy in each of the last five years, and 86 two years ago. That was the second time Backstrom finished top ten in voting for both the Selke and Hart trophies.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/backsni02.html

McDonagh finished top ten in Norris voting once, in 2013-14. He's a year younger but much further removed from being a dominant player at his position, and has never received a vote for the Hart trophy, so he's probably never been thought of as a dominant player in the entire NHL. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mcdonry01.html

So let me help you understand how to sort this out: you were joking, after all.


McDonough and JT Miller fetched that return, not McDonaugh on his own
29 avr. 2018 à 19 h 38
#38
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
Would you have given up a 1st 2nd 3rd for Tomas Tatar?


Fair enough. Some trades are dumb.

Quoting: The_Architect
McDonough and JT Miller fetched that return, not McDonaugh on his own


Fair point. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/millejt01.html

Miller's not bad. So the Caps throw in Connolly.
29 avr. 2018 à 20 h 12
#39
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
Would you have given up a 1st 2nd 3rd for Tomas Tatar?


This isn't exactly arguing that Backstrom's value is low right now, though. Another comparable in terms of age, contract years left, and position might be Derrick Brassard, who fetched a top four D in his prime with multiple Cup rings, a promising rookie, a 1st and a 2nd. Of course, Backstrom outscores Brassard by 7/4ths, this season and career, and Washington is a playoff team without external financial constraints motivating them to get rid of a top six center.
29 avr. 2018 à 20 h 14
#40
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,712
Mentions "j'aime": 2,820
I don't know what's worse. The fact that these deals were thought of or that they were released for the world to see...
29 avr. 2018 à 20 h 51
#41
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
This isn't exactly arguing that Backstrom's value is low right now, though. Another comparable in terms of age, contract years left, and position might be Derrick Brassard, who fetched a top four D in his prime with multiple Cup rings, a promising rookie, a 1st and a 2nd. Of course, Backstrom outscores Brassard by 7/4ths, this season and career, and Washington is a playoff team without external financial constraints motivating them to get rid of a top six center.


The point I'm trying to make is that the only reason McDonaugh fetched that return is because TB felt he was the missing puzzle piece for a cup run. TB is super talented, young and have 1 of the top prospect pools in the league. They were able to overpay for Mcdonaugh. I don't think for a minute that was fair value. Same thing goes for the Tatar trade. When you're stacked with draft picks you can afford to over pay. In my books it doesn't mean that's their actual value on paper. Just like how Buffalo got fleeced by the Sharks on the Kane trade. BUF got garbage in return.
29 avr. 2018 à 20 h 53
#42
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: BoltsPoint21
I don't know what's worse. The fact that these deals were thought of or that they were released for the world to see...


Don't think too hard...
29 avr. 2018 à 20 h 55
#43
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
Fair enough. Some trades are dumb.



Fair point. https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/millejt01.html

Miller's not bad. So the Caps throw in Connolly.


Not bad? Miller any day over Nemestnikov.
29 avr. 2018 à 21 h 6
#44
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
This isn't exactly arguing that Backstrom's value is low right now, though. Another comparable in terms of age, contract years left, and position might be Derrick Brassard, who fetched a top four D in his prime with multiple Cup rings, a promising rookie, a 1st and a 2nd. Of course, Backstrom outscores Brassard by 7/4ths, this season and career, and Washington is a playoff team without external financial constraints motivating them to get rid of a top six center.


Derrick Brassard didn't fetch that on his own. Pttsburgh got assets coming back their way for those assets you mentioned above
30 avr. 2018 à 8 h 28
#45
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
Not bad? Miller any day over Nemestnikov.[/quote
Yeah. miller gets you ten extra assists a year. Goals are the same the last couple years. Miller just got started earlier with those. Minutes are about the same. /quote]

I agree that Miller is better, but at the moment the main difference is those ten assists a year. They each score twenty goals in 16 minutes. Kind of amazing how close they are, given they were drafted less half a round apart in 2011. It's almost like scouts are learning to project talent.
30 avr. 2018 à 8 h 43
#46
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
Derrick Brassard didn't fetch that on his own. Pttsburgh got assets coming back their way for those assets you mentioned above


Pittsburgh got a prospect from Vegas to send to Ottawa as part of the above? I already looked it up once for the sake of getting an accurate read on Backstrom's value. If you want to keep refuting, cut and paste a better explanation than I read. Otherwise, and this may not bother you, I am not remotely convinced.

You're claiming all these other teams have desperate needs that skewed trade values. It's worth noting that Montreal doesn't desperately need a center, and hasn't desperately needed one for years, right? Not enough to trade Sergachev for a wing who can almost play center?

Right...

If you want to get a good deal on a center who isn't necessarily successful with his current team, call Buffalo about O'Reilly. In his best years, O'Reilly is almost as good as Backstrom. He may be enough to get the Habs to the playoffs.

Backstrom is third on the Caps in playoff points this year, but he's usually higher. I just don't see Washington wanting to move a center without getting a fantastic offer, probably built around a high 1st pick, plus prospects, and maybe a decent NHL player or two.

The value of Brassard and McDonagh comes down to the goals they have scored in high pressure situations in the playoffs. Backstrom has more playoff ppg than either, and reminded us why with a brilliant deflection to win the first round this year.

Again, if the Caps decide they want to give up and rebuild, you might get lucky, but it's hard to make that call when they've won their division three straight years and just keep running into a Pittsburgh team that's stocked almost entirely with guys like Brassard and Kessel who coast through the regular season and then show up like superstars in the playoffs. Backstrom, in the playoffs, can shut down Crosby and outscore him through seven games.

If the Caps aren't rebuilding, your trade offers are insults that get laughed off, because they make it much harder for Washington to beat Pittsburgh. If Washington is rebuilding, a top ten draft pick and a couple good prospects, and a couple decent young players might do it? It'll really just come down to market economics and, even if they are rebuilding, lowball offers for Karlsson showed that sometimes the best move is to keep a longtime star around, and see what people offer the next year.
30 avr. 2018 à 12 h 23
#47
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
Pittsburgh got a prospect from Vegas to send to Ottawa as part of the above? I already looked it up once for the sake of getting an accurate read on Backstrom's value. If you want to keep refuting, cut and paste a better explanation than I read. Otherwise, and this may not bother you, I am not remotely convinced.

You're claiming all these other teams have desperate needs that skewed trade values. It's worth noting that Montreal doesn't desperately need a center, and hasn't desperately needed one for years, right? Not enough to trade Sergachev for a wing who can almost play center?

Right...

If you want to get a good deal on a center who isn't necessarily successful with his current team, call Buffalo about O'Reilly. In his best years, O'Reilly is almost as good as Backstrom. He may be enough to get the Habs to the playoffs.

Backstrom is third on the Caps in playoff points this year, but he's usually higher. I just don't see Washington wanting to move a center without getting a fantastic offer, probably built around a high 1st pick, plus prospects, and maybe a decent NHL player or two.

The value of Brassard and McDonagh comes down to the goals they have scored in high pressure situations in the playoffs. Backstrom has more playoff ppg than either, and reminded us why with a brilliant deflection to win the first round this year.

Again, if the Caps decide they want to give up and rebuild, you might get lucky, but it's hard to make that call when they've won their division three straight years and just keep running into a Pittsburgh team that's stocked almost entirely with guys like Brassard and Kessel who coast through the regular season and then show up like superstars in the playoffs. Backstrom, in the playoffs, can shut down Crosby and outscore him through seven games.

If the Caps aren't rebuilding, your trade offers are insults that get laughed off, because they make it much harder for Washington to beat Pittsburgh. If Washington is rebuilding, a top ten draft pick and a couple good prospects, and a couple decent young players might do it? It'll really just come down to market economics and, even if they are rebuilding, lowball offers for Karlsson showed that sometimes the best move is to keep a longtime star around, and see what people offer the next year.


Along with Brassard, Pittsburgh also receives a third round draft pick (2018) and forward prospect Vincent Dunn from the Senators as well as forward prospect Tobias Lindberg from the Golden Knights.
30 avr. 2018 à 12 h 42
#48
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
Along with Brassard, Pittsburgh also receives a third round draft pick (2018) and forward prospect Vincent Dunn from the Senators as well as forward prospect Tobias Lindberg from the Golden Knights.


This checks out.

Whatevs.

I agree with your main point that the above roster has a ton of depth at center.

Can you see where Ottawa and NYR did not see themselves as immediate Stanley Cup contenders with McDonagh and Brassard, and felt it was time to cut bait?

I have previously traded Backstrom on here for Juulsen and MTL's 2018 first. But not on a contending Caps roster. Only on frustration posts after the Caps were down two games to Columbus or down one home game to the Pens. Now they're tied with Pittsburgh, and three games from the rest being downhill, so you're out of your mind to suggest that kind of pessimistic nonsense where Washington's concerned.

Give it a week and get back to us.


There's a dilemma with Petry: before free agency, the Caps don't accept the cap hit because they don't want to lose Carlson. After you've signed Carlson for the same money at shorter term than Washington offers him if they have half a brain... the whole league can see that MTL is paying Petry 4M to play 3rd pair, and his trade value falls a lot. So whether you're making the trade before or after free agency, you're trying to get Nick Backstrom for a late first round pick whose name you cant' even remember because he has been so unimpressive.

Do you get how that's trolling?
30 avr. 2018 à 15 h 27
#49
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: Eli
This checks out.

Whatevs.

I agree with your main point that the above roster has a ton of depth at center.

Can you see where Ottawa and NYR did not see themselves as immediate Stanley Cup contenders with McDonagh and Brassard, and felt it was time to cut bait?

I have previously traded Backstrom on here for Juulsen and MTL's 2018 first. But not on a contending Caps roster. Only on frustration posts after the Caps were down two games to Columbus or down one home game to the Pens. Now they're tied with Pittsburgh, and three games from the rest being downhill, so you're out of your mind to suggest that kind of pessimistic nonsense where Washington's concerned.

Give it a week and get back to us.


There's a dilemma with Petry: before free agency, the Caps don't accept the cap hit because they don't want to lose Carlson. After you've signed Carlson for the same money at shorter term than Washington offers him if they have half a brain... the whole league can see that MTL is paying Petry 4M to play 3rd pair, and his trade value falls a lot. So whether you're making the trade before or after free agency, you're trying to get Nick Backstrom for a late first round pick whose name you cant' even remember because he has been so unimpressive.

Do you get how that's trolling?


I gotta give it to you...only because the time you invested to prove a point.

Here's what I calculate. Backstrom's age, his # of years left on his term. The fact that he played with Ovi all these years which there's a strong argument to make that he inflated Backstrom's stats. His team has underachieved when it counts the most in the playoffs, and as a leader a bulk of the blame falls on him, it seems as though he can't elevate his team to seize the moment. So Im offering Galchenyuk who's 24, has potted 30 goals, with a decent cap hit. And here's Petry, that the whole league can see that he played 1st pairing minutes and PP, and started lighting it up on the scoresheet once Weber went down with injury, and that a good chunk of his time in MTL played with Emelin, who hindered Petry's game cause he shouldn't be anywhere close to playing top 4 D minutes.

As far as the timing for the trade I made above, I'm guilty for not being more strategic. The Backstrom trade specificaly has to be one of the last moves.

If i was to get my hands on Karlsson, O'Reilly and Giroux early on, then the rest of the dominos (Tavares, JVR, Carlson) will start falling. Carlson could get 8×8 in WSH, but he'd have a hard time turning down 8×7 to play with the above players, if I got my hands on them one way or another.
30 avr. 2018 à 15 h 34
#50
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: The_Architect
I gotta give it to you...only because the time you invested to prove a point.

Here's what I calculate. Backstrom's age, his # of years left on his term. The fact that he played with Ovi all these years which there's a strong argument to make that he inflated Backstrom's stats. His team has underachieved when it counts the most in the playoffs, and as a leader a bulk of the blame falls on him, it seems as though he can't elevate his team to seize the moment. So Im offering Galchenyuk who's 24, has potted 30 goals, with a decent cap hit. And here's Petry, that the whole league can see that he played 1st pairing minutes and PP, and started lighting it up on the scoresheet once Weber went down with injury, and that a good chunk of his time in MTL played with Emelin, who hindered Petry's game cause he shouldn't be anywhere close to playing top 4 D minutes.

As far as the timing for the trade I made above, I'm guilty for not being more strategic. The Backstrom trade specificaly has to be one of the last moves.

If i was to get my hands on Karlsson, O'Reilly and Giroux early on, then the rest of the dominos (Tavares, JVR, Carlson) will start falling. Carlson could get 8×8 in WSH, but he'd have a hard time turning down 8×7 to play with the above players, if I got my hands on them one way or another.


Backstrom has 84 points in 104 playoff games. He's third on the Caps in playoff points without playing on Ovechkin's line this year.

If the Caps are looking to get better at playoff hockey, they keep him.

If they're looking to trade him, it's for a top five pick, plus prospects and depth players.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage