There needs to be a Seattle team first. Projections have them being NHL ready in 2020. If you think Seabrook is bad now, imagine how he'll be in 2-3 years. It's going to take a king's ransom to get Seattle to take Seabrook.
The correct answer is both. It'd cost them a ton to get rid of his contract. If Seattle gets a team via expansion, that would be a perfect move for them to make.
There needs to be a Seattle team first. Projections have them being NHL ready in 2020. If you think Seabrook is bad now, imagine how he'll be in 2-3 years. It's going to take a king's ransom to get Seattle to take Seabrook.
Well, we will see but if David Clarkson was able to be traded I think Seabrook will be a little easier to move...
Seabrook also has a full NMC all the way through 2022. He would need to waive it in order to moved (assuming we have the same protection rules for the next expansion draft).
Répondre
CapFriendly
CapFriendly