SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Interesting Idea

Créé par: ithical
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 23 nov. 2017
Publié: 23 nov. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Thoughts on this are that BM would want a cost controlled forward for any trade when it would be a rental. Toronto needs a defender Ducks could use young talent and center depth for a playoff run. Sosh will not get much time on the Leafs and he is a good penalty killer. I figure he could be a good replacement for Cogs down the road and have Silf play the left side.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $62 548 416 $0 $975 000 $12 451 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
670 000 $670 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
AD
UFA - 1
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 nov. 2017 à 21 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Not sure on the trade. Swap Montour and Larsson. Swap Vermette and Wagner
23 nov. 2017 à 21 h 25
#2
Démarrer sujet
Ithical
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Modifié 23 nov. 2017 à 21 h 37
Montour needs to get away from Cam. It does not suit them well enough. BM/RC need to spread out the defensive production. Also, Wagner is a righty. I guess I could switch Grant with Wagner but Grant has the better production.
23 nov. 2017 à 22 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 429
Mentions "j'aime": 99
I'm kind of shocked a Ducks fan posted this. As a Leafs fan I make this deal with no hesitation.

Maybe it's closer if Bozak isn't on an expiring deal but I just don't see this as very good for you guys.
24 nov. 2017 à 0 h 41
#4
Démarrer sujet
Ithical
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Call me more realistic.. Vatenan can be replaced by Montour. Ducks are in a more win-now mode then others may think and we need younger players moving forward. I see this as a win-win.
24 nov. 2017 à 14 h 45
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 424
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: ithical
Call me more realistic.. Vatenan can be replaced by Montour. Ducks are in a more win-now mode then others may think and we need younger players moving forward. I see this as a win-win.


Except Vatanen helps you win more than Bozak. You're trading a 20+ minute all situation D with term for a guy who will be a 3c when we're healthy and he doesnt even have a contract beyond this year. If they Ducks add bozak it will be for Futures that the Ducks could recoup in the summer by trading Vatanen then.
24 nov. 2017 à 15 h 4
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
For the last time Vatanen isn't going to be dealt for a pending UFA? And Bozak is a pending UFA.
24 nov. 2017 à 15 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Garitjax
Quoting: ithical
Call me more realistic.. Vatenan can be replaced by Montour. Ducks are in a more win-now mode then others may think and we need younger players moving forward. I see this as a win-win.


Except Vatanen helps you win more than Bozak. You're trading a 20+ minute all situation D with term for a guy who will be a 3c when we're healthy and he doesnt even have a contract beyond this year. If they Ducks add bozak it will be for Futures that the Ducks could recoup in the summer by trading Vatanen then.


This. It's terrible for the Ducks. I don't think Bozak can be had by ANA for anything realistic. This is a great draft year, so I don't see BM moving our 1st for a rental. Anything less then that and TOR says "no" because they know they can get it at the TDL. Anyway, right now, TOR are in a playoff spot and don't look like sellers anyway.

I think we should get a more long term option by trading Larsson for a young, cost-controlled C with 2C potential. He really is expendable with Lindholm, Fowler and Megna on the left side moving forward.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage