SalarySwishSalarySwish

why is chicgeo so bad

Créé par: didosvo
Équipe: 2018-19 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 15 nov. 2018
Publié: 15 nov. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
2.
DAL
  1. Hayden, John
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de ARI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2479 500 000 $68 925 000 $1 232 500 $3 832 500 $10 575 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
872 500 $872 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

15 nov. 2018 à 12 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 869
Mentions "j'aime": 792
Because after our first two lines there is no depth what so ever.

Our off season signings consisted of Kunitz, Manning, and Ward which were all terrible signings.

Seabrook is a huge cap liability.

Don't know why you have Schmaltz and Kahun on the 4th line or Seabrook on the top pair.
15 nov. 2018 à 12 h 43
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,222
Mentions "j'aime": 10,767
I think it's because of the continued 1st round picks being traded away and the tight cap...which then results in poor UFA signings since CHI has zero cap space. BUT, I'll do it EVERY time if I can get 3 Cups. It really is the price you pay....just to have a chance...at winning the Cup. TBL and SJ are sending away multiple 1st rounders too. It takes mortgaging your future because if 1 teams does it...you need to respond and each team wants the "leg up"

***EDIT*** with that said. let's give @Stan_Bowman some props for who he's drafted. SOLID drafts and for quite some time to be honest. (2015 is an understandable exception)
15 nov. 2018 à 12 h 57
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,169
Mentions "j'aime": 6,324
Quoting: TheJonSnow
Because after our first two lines there is no depth what so ever.

Our off season signings consisted of Kunitz and Manning which were terrible signings.

Seabrook is a huge cap liability.

Don't know why you have Schmaltz and Kahun on the 4th line or Seabrook on the top pair.


Going to go ahead and Edit Ward out of your quote because he has been actually useful.
15 nov. 2018 à 17 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 869
Mentions "j'aime": 792
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Going to go ahead and Edit Ward out of your quote because he has been actually useful.


He has played like 2 good games. Save percentage is below .900. We should have used that cap space on forward depth. I have no problem with forsberg being the backup and saving 3 mil.
15 nov. 2018 à 17 h 51
#5
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,169
Mentions "j'aime": 6,324
Quoting: TheJonSnow
He has played like 2 good games. Save percentage is below .900. We should have used that cap space on forward depth. I have no problem with forsberg being the backup and saving 3 mil.


He has given us a chance every game he started. His save percentage is more reflective of his defense than his performance .
Voir tout