SalarySwishSalarySwish

Improving the Kings 2425

Créé par: Imraygbiv
Équipe: 2024-25 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 15 mai 2024
Publié: 15 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
36 250 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2874 125 $
21 675 000 $
2850 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
21 875 000 $
21 300 000 $
2875 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
21 300 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
2.
LAK
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de MIN
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2026
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $87 638 333 $1 850 000 $850 000 $61 667 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
850 000 $850 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

15 mai à 18 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 186
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Goaltending situation here is a disaster and you're limiting yourself to a 22 man roster.
15 mai à 18 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 131
Mentions "j'aime": 44
I mean the Kings just re-signed Rittich for 1 more year at 1M so he's pretty much locked in to be 1B again.

With the emergence of Portillo this season, I dont think the Kings should be going all in and giving up 2-3 assets for a top 15 calibre starter. Just gonna have to make do with the 1A/1B again.
15 mai à 18 h 19
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 42,030
Mentions "j'aime": 26,626
Welcome to CapFriendly! Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

I think that the Chychrun ship sailed at the trade deadline. I don't see spending our first-round draft pick on an expensive LD rental. I'd rather use the money to re-sign Viktor Arvidsson in an effort to provide a quality productive veteran (him or Kevin Fiala) for Pierre-Luc DuBois; failing that, I'd prefer to re-sign Blake Lizotte and use the left-overs to add a 14th forward.

Although it may not constitute progress, I'd stick with the top-6 of Byfield - Kopitar - Kempe and Moore - Danault - Arvidsson/Fiala. Having DuBois improve dramatically on his first season with the Kings (especially if we can get him at least one quality winger) should be a sufficient advance on the offensive side of things.

Craig Smith is an interesting idea for a bottom-6 forward that I haven't seen anyone suggest so far.
15 mai à 18 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 131
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Welcome to CapFriendly! Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

I think that the Chychrun ship sailed at the trade deadline. I don't see spending our first-round draft pick on an expensive LD rental. I'd rather use the money to re-sign Viktor Arvidsson in an effort to provide a quality productive veteran (him or Kevin Fiala) for Pierre-Luc DuBois; failing that, I'd prefer to re-sign Blake Lizotte and use the left-overs to add a 14th forward.

Although it may not constitute progress, I'd stick with the top-6 of Byfield - Kopitar - Kempe and Moore - Danault - Arvidsson/Fiala. Having DuBois improve dramatically on his first season with the Kings (especially if we can get him at least one quality winger) should be a sufficient advance on the offensive side of things.

Craig Smith is an interesting idea for a bottom-6 forward that I haven't seen anyone suggest so far.


The Chychrun to LA ship will never die. I imagine the Kings (and Jakob) would be interested in extending him beyond just next season. That left side desperately needs some mobility and playmaking, I cant take another season watching our RD get pressured, forced to throw it around the net to the LD, and then see them toss it up the boards to no one. Whatever it takes to get Englund out of the lineup.

If RV is taking a VERY team-friendly deal, I wouldnt say no to taking him back, but his injuries are a serious concern. Best asset is availability. Not adding skill to PLD's line if he's not on it most of the season.
15 mai à 18 h 26
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 7,642
Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
OTT declines not even close
Voir tout