SalarySwishSalarySwish

Can Sens make the playoffs

Créé par: Rocket_Rusty
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2024
Publié: 14 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2800 000 $
32 000 000 $
2800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
31 100 000 $
22 500 000 $
31 100 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
11 100 000 $
Transactions
OTT
  1. Karlsson, Erik (2 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de FLA
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $87 259 047 $850 000 $82 500 $240 953 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 mars à 6 h 32
#1
Devo's 2nd Mock Draf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 343
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Wouldn't have to give up that much to land Karlsson.... The Pens would be happy just to unload his cap hit. Think of why Staios got absolutely nothing for Tarasenko
14 mars à 6 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 929
Mentions "j'aime": 217
Quoting: Riddick19
Wouldn't have to give up that much to land Karlsson.... The Pens would be happy just to unload his cap hit. Think of why Staios got absolutely nothing for Tarasenko


It would be a more even trade if it were Karlsson at 50% which is 5M retained making Chych effectively cost 9.6 vs 4.6 next year [4k savings over EK] but a problem the year after if 87 wants to stay
14 mars à 7 h 9
#3
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,027
Mentions "j'aime": 1,359
Quoting: TheeDjeeEem
It would be a more even trade if it were Karlsson at 50% which is 5M retained making Chych effectively cost 9.6 vs 4.6 next year [4k savings over EK] but a problem the year after if 87 wants to stay


That's not even at all. It's an absurdly stupid move for PIT team to make. Trade for a one year rental in a rebuild while eating $15m in dead money over three years. Start adding futures for that one.
14 mars à 7 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 929
Mentions "j'aime": 217
Quoting: jfkst1
That's not even at all. It's an absurdly stupid move for PIT team to make. Trade for a one year rental in a rebuild while eating $15m in dead money over three years. Start adding futures for that one.


In this trade, PIT gets a younger, better player at a cheaper cap rate for next year that is very tradable at the deadline or resignable to a long term deal. The retention is the cost of having an old, overpaid player who is worth a 3x5M, not 3x8M or 3x6M.

Considering PIT didn't make playoffs this year or last, the team needs to go big for 87 or watch him lead a bad team into his anti-climactic retirement.
14 mars à 7 h 51
#5
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,027
Mentions "j'aime": 1,359
Quoting: TheeDjeeEem
In this trade, PIT gets a younger, better player at a cheaper cap rate for next year that is very tradable at the deadline or resignable to a long term deal. The retention is the cost of having an old, overpaid player who is worth a 3x5M, not 3x8M or 3x6M.

Considering PIT didn't make playoffs this year or last, the team needs to go big for 87 or watch him lead a bad team into his anti-climactic retirement.


It's very easy for fans to make these claims because we have no obligation to balance the books. Reality isn't so convenient. Look at how PIT got Karlsson in the first place; they were the only team that could afford his contract with minor retention. FSG has deeper pockets than SJ ownership, but you're utterly delusional if you think they are trading him at 50% for a one year rental. That's "get fired quickly" material if ownership even approves it at all. Karlsson at 50% retained is excellent value, and you know that or you wouldn't have him in the top pairing either BTW. At minimum it would require an additional 2026 1st and even that is questionable value for Dubas that probably only looks good if OTT makes it unprotected and the pick ends up in the top 15.
Voir tout