SalarySwishSalarySwish

24-25

Créé par: swinny
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2024
Publié: 21 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Feel that staying the course really is the best course of action. The Ducks are VERY young, but the talent is defintely there.

Opted to make 2 FA signings that I think make sense.

1. Wennberg: a solid 3C that offensively is an upgrade on Lundestörm (who I see as a great 4C given where he has rounded out). A very good defensive player..... underrated. Some may suggest using McTavish, Carlsson and Zegras down the middle, which maybe valid - but in moving Zegras to the wing, the top 6 is very solid, and gives the Ducks a bit of centre depth to boot. Didn't want to give anyone significant term at 3C. Wennberg at $4.5 million is perhaps a little pricey, but this term falls off the books as the Ducks should be entering their window.


2. Miller: the Ducks blueline is sooooo young. Felt it necessary to pair the kids with a vet defender. Could I do better than Miller? Probably, but I also do not want to block Luneau's path to the NHL (I feel strongly a year in San Diego is not going to hurt him).
Miller definitelyis overpriced here but more thinking of making sure you land the guy. Further, a contract more then movable at the TDL if the Ducks retain 50%. Retaining for a season isn't the worst thing.

Notes:

1. Was apprehensive about having Zellweger on the roster- more about just how young this blueline is. But, his work at the NHL level suggests he is ready. San Diego is going to do nothing for him. I say the same thing for LaCombe. Ideally, sending one of them down to have a more experienced blueline would be my direction.... but the kids have earned their spot, and then some. If you are not expected to win yet, let them cut their teeth.

2. Gibson..... moving him would be soemthing I want to do, but, I simply don't believe now is the time. Be selling far too low, and retaining for 3 years is just not an option. Hope is as the Ducks improve, Gibson gets back to a form and Dostal continues to improve. The time is coming. This isn't it.

3. The Ducks could do better than Wennberg and Miller to fill the holes (thinking Ross Colton here lol), but this is not the time to be moving draft capital or assets. Many to the kids here are graduating, and the cupboard needs a restock. Keep it simple, and fill out without using assets.

Overall outlook: miss the playoffs, but if healthy should be a year to great growth and improvement.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 800 000 $
21 700 000 $
2950 000 $
31 300 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $67 494 167 $0 $6 550 000 $20 205 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

21 mars à 13 h 19
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,959
Mentions "j'aime": 6,755
I don't think Zell is ready for NHL duty yet, his defensive game just isn't there, he's been getting chewed up and spat out the last two weeks. Give him a year or two in SD.

Same for Luneau, coming off a lost season due to knee infection, let him cut his pro teeth down in SD and play alongside Hinds for a season or two.

However, I'd go after one of the top 4 RDs available, Mintyukov's development into a true #1 is critical for this team, let's give that the best possible chance with Pesche.

I'd also keep Lindstrom around, his microstats have been good for a 6/7 guy, he seems to fit the system, and he's the right age.

As to 3C, I really think it's about putting a shooter with Lundewtrom, he's a play making and play extending forward who's been good in the dot, in the limited time together, I liked him and Vatrano on the same line. With Verbeek wanting to shore up the bottom 6, I could see the improvements being made by pushing from the top down.
21 mars à 14 h 55
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,801
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I don't think Zell is ready for NHL duty yet, his defensive game just isn't there, he's been getting chewed up and spat out the last two weeks. Give him a year or two in SD.

Same for Luneau, coming off a lost season due to knee infection, let him cut his pro teeth down in SD and play alongside Hinds for a season or two.

However, I'd go after one of the top 4 RDs available, Mintyukov's development into a true #1 is critical for this team, let's give that the best possible chance with Pesche.

I'd also keep Lindstrom around, his microstats have been good for a 6/7 guy, he seems to fit the system, and he's the right age.

As to 3C, I really think it's about putting a shooter with Lundewtrom, he's a play making and play extending forward who's been good in the dot, in the limited time together, I liked him and Vatrano on the same as line. With Verbeek wanting to shore up the bottom 6, I could see the improvements being made by pushing from the top down.


Well, I did say I was apprehensive about having Zellweger on the roster. He is showing well all things considered (imo), so it does create a conundrum. I 100% see the point of a year at least in San Diego. It won't hurt ine bit.

To the point of going after one of the "top tier" RD on the market - the temptation is there. The Ducks have the money. I was trepidations about it for two reasons: 1. I have to think the Pesce's of the world will be hoping to sign with a contender (which the Ducks are not right now), and 2. Long-term, it stands to reason that the hope is Luneau amd Warren are in the top 4. Maybe trying to land on of those guys bridges that gap. Same time, I wanna leave that door as open as possible.

Again, I see the point there.

Lastly, I am one to say I do not see Lundestörm as a 3C. Fabulous 4C. But him as a 3C I don't think cuts it when stacking up against other teams. The defensive game is there. 100%. But I see him more as a Kämpf type - where he "can" play 3C, but much better suited for 4C. (My Leafs fan-age coming out there). Wennberg is more a stop gap if you will, waiting to see how that core of McT, Zegras, Gauthier, Carlsson pan out. Could very well be one of those 4 end up suited for 3C (I doubt it, but play along).

I look at the Ducks, at they are at a point where they do need to be competitive. Not playoffs, but competitive. With Wennberg, I see a pretty solid top 9 that can produce, and a rather nasty checking unit with some offensive pop to it (for a 4th line).

See the path of least resistance to being more competitive is rounding out the forward core over spending on the back end and with term. Too much shaking out there yet..... but there is an aweful lot.to like about it.

Your thoughts are solid. Certainly a direction to go.

What is clear from what you are saying and from what I see from a far is this really is a critical offseasonnfor the Ducks. The decisions have bigger implications than they have for the last couple years.
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
21 mars à 15 h 32
#3
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,959
Mentions "j'aime": 6,755
Quoting: swinny
Well, I did say I was apprehensive about having Zellweger on the roster. He is showing well all things considered (imo), so it does create a conundrum. I 100% see the point of a year at least in San Diego. It won't hurt ine bit.

To the point of going after one of the "top tier" RD on the market - the temptation is there. The Ducks have the money. I was trepidations about it for two reasons: 1. I have to think the Pesce's of the world will be hoping to sign with a contender (which the Ducks are not right now), and 2. Long-term, it stands to reason that the hope is Luneau amd Warren are in the top 4. Maybe trying to land on of those guys bridges that gap. Same time, I wanna leave that door as open as possible.

Again, I see the point there.

Lastly, I am one to say I do not see Lundestörm as a 3C. Fabulous 4C. But him as a 3C I don't think cuts it when stacking up against other teams. The defensive game is there. 100%. But I see him more as a Kämpf type - where he "can" play 3C, but much better suited for 4C. (My Leafs fan-age coming out there). Wennberg is more a stop gap if you will, waiting to see how that core of McT, Zegras, Gauthier, Carlsson pan out. Could very well be one of those 4 end up suited for 3C (I doubt it, but play along).

I look at the Ducks, at they are at a point where they do need to be competitive. Not playoffs, but competitive. With Wennberg, I see a pretty solid top 9 that can produce, and a rather nasty checking unit with some offensive pop to it (for a 4th line).

See the path of least resistance to being more competitive is rounding out the forward core over spending on the back end and with term. Too much shaking out there yet..... but there is an aweful lot.to like about it.

Your thoughts are solid. Certainly a direction to go.

What is clear from what you are saying and from what I see from a far is this really is a critical offseasonnfor the Ducks. The decisions have bigger implications than they have for the last couple years.


I will add that I forgot to mention, I'd offer Pesche a 5-6 year deal and chuck money at him to make it work. Signing past 5 gives me hesitation. Beautiful part of where the Ducks are currently is in 3 years if Warren is popping off in SD and ready to take over, we can eat some of Pesce's salary and trade him to a contender where he can be an effective bottom 4 RHD.
21 mars à 15 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,801
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I will add that I forgot to mention, I'd offer Pesche a 5-6 year deal and chuck money at him to make it work. Signing past 5 gives me hesitation. Beautiful part of where the Ducks are currently is in 3 years if Warren is popping off in SD and ready to take over, we can eat some of Pesce's salary and trade him to a contender where he can be an effective bottom 4 RHD.


Well, Pesce won't sign for less, that is for certain.

I guess the question is in 3 years time if the Ducks are in a position to eat some of that salary? Time will tell; but the plan is solid
21 mars à 15 h 59
#5
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,959
Mentions "j'aime": 6,755
Quoting: swinny
Well, Pesce won't sign for less, that is for certain.

I guess the question is in 3 years time if the Ducks are in a position to eat some of that salary? Time will tell; but the plan is solid


Very few GMs hand out long term deals that end in a players late 30s, only two I knew of no longer GM in the league (Hextall and Wilson) Pesce will be 30 as near as makes no difference at the start of next season, and while he'll play better longer than a typical defenseman might, age will catch up to an 8 year contract.

He might find one at a reduced AAV with a competitor who doesn't expect him to see the tail end of that deal, but that's where I think Anaheim has an advantage, we can boost the AAV to compensate and have a similar total contract earnings.
Voir tout