SalarySwishSalarySwish

Swinging Kahks

Créé par: Anus_McLeod
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 31 janv. 2024
Publié: 31 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Kak Swing No. One: SJ gets a buy low opportunity. The Rangers get a better player in the short term and also send away a cap dump for another improvement.

Kahk Swing No. Two: If the Sharks cannot or choose not to re-sign Kahkonen, they move him to a team that doesn't ask for retention. The return would be lower than if they kept money, but this gives them flex to also see if anyone is interested in a guy like Hoffman, Granlund, etc. at 50% off.

Overall, SJ walks away with Kakko, without giving up anything really important, which is a pretty big swing for them.
Transactions
1.
2.
SJS
  1. Prosvetov, Ivan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de VGK
Logo de COL
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 183 335 $25 000 $1 545 000 $4 316 665 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

31 janv. à 12 h 2
#1
sharks88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 175
I like the framework of KK + BG.
The Rags need a 3C, and Sturm won't really fit that mold for them.
I'd rather see SJ keep Sturm here and do 50% on Duke for a little better return that still gives NY cap flexibility for a 3C for the playoff run.
Either way, I'd be good with something like you've made.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
31 janv. à 12 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Rangers decline. Like sharksdoee said above, Sturm does not fill the 3C need. Rangers would just send a mid round draft pick or two for Duclair. And trade for someone like Monahan or Henrique.

While it is tempting to use Kakko to get out of the Goodrow contract, they could just buy him out in the offseason.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
31 janv. à 12 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: sharksdoee
I like the framework of KK + BG.
The Rags need a 3C, and Sturm won't really fit that mold for them.
I'd rather see SJ keep Sturm here and do 50% on Duke for a little better return that still gives NY cap flexibility for a 3C for the playoff run.
Either way, I'd be good with something like you've made.


Thanks for the feedback!

I thought about some of the same things (Rags needing 3C). I went with this in the end because (1) they will also need to replace BG with someone (enter Sturm), and (2) this leaves them with all their picks and some cap space to try and address that other need. In other words, while it doesn't solve every problem, it does leave them in a position to make another move.
sharksdoee a aimé ceci.
31 janv. à 12 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: hero9154
Rangers decline. Like sharksdoee said above, Sturm does not fill the 3C need. Rangers would just send a mid round draft pick or two for Duclair. And trade for someone like Monahan or Henrique.

While it is tempting to use Kakko to get out of the Goodrow contract, they could just buy him out in the offseason.


Fair enough, but I disagree about the buyout. While it's not crazy expensive and even pretty much nothing next season, that's 6 years of him on the books. I'd personally try real hard to avoid that.
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
31 janv. à 12 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Fair enough, but I disagree about the buyout. While it's not crazy expensive and even pretty much nothing next season, that's 6 years of him on the books. I'd personally try real hard to avoid that.


If this was 2 years ago I would agree but with the cap rising over the next couple of seasons it makes a buyout more palatable. Only the 2026-27 season is where the cap hit is above $1.1M.
Voir tout