SalarySwishSalarySwish

D on the move

Créé par: DarthKane
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2024
Publié: 30 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
CHI
  1. Jiricek, David
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $75 108 457 $0 $5 945 000 $8 391 543 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

30 janv. à 18 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
In a world where Columbus did actually end up entertaining offers or Jiricek, the pieces in the return here just don't make sense. They're stacked at LD for the future between Werenski, Meteychuk, Svozil, and Ceulemans. The biggest reason Jiricek is so unlikely to be moved even if the relationship sours further is because a long term top pairing RD is something that only he can fill for Columbus. They don't have anyone else on the roster or pipeline with anywhere near the potential to be that, so trading him for a LD and winger just doesn't make sense need wise.
Garak a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 18 h 18
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 959
A rare ACGM trade proposal that makes no sense for either team.
Garak a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 18 h 20
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,081
Mentions "j'aime": 9,404
Quoting: Trevor31lv
In a world where Columbus did actually end up entertaining offers or Jiricek, the pieces in the return here just don't make sense. They're stacked at LD for the future between Werenski, Meteychuk, Svozil, and Ceulemans. The biggest reason Jiricek is so unlikely to be moved even if the relationship sours further is because a long term top pairing RD is something that only he can fill for Columbus. They don't have anyone else on the roster or pipeline with anywhere near the potential to be that, so trading him for a LD and winger just doesn't make sense need wise.


And why would the Hawks move 1 highly rated defense prospect for another? Korchinski isn't souring in Chicago, if the relationship with Jiricek sours with colombus, Chicago's not going to move a highly touted prospect in return....it's a net zero gain for chicago.
Garak a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 19 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
Quoting: ChiHawk
And why would the Hawks move 1 highly rated defense prospect for another? Korchinski isn't souring in Chicago, if the relationship with Jiricek sours with colombus, Chicago's not going to move a highly touted prospect in return....it's a net zero gain for chicago.


Which is exactly why this makes 0 sense. I'm not telling you to ignore Chicago's situation. Just have some awareness of the team your trying to trade with. The same way you're saying Chicago has no reason to move Korchinski, Columbus has no reason to move Jiricek for a package that fills 0 needs.
Garak a aimé ceci.
30 janv. à 19 h 13
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,081
Mentions "j'aime": 9,404
Quoting: Trevor31lv
Which is exactly why this makes 0 sense. I'm not telling you to ignore Chicago's situation. Just have some awareness of the team your trying to trade with. The same way you're saying Chicago has no reason to move Korchinski, Columbus has no reason to move Jiricek for a package that fills 0 needs.


I'm not trying to trade (nor are the Hawks) Korchinski; it's a net zero move for both teams.
Garak a aimé ceci.
Voir tout