SalarySwishSalarySwish

nrob kaner boosh tanev greer

Créé par: leafs101
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 nov. 2023
Publié: 6 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. Kokkonen, Mikko
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Lyubushkin, Ilya (1 375 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Hirvonen, Roni
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $78 043 950 $0 $0 $5 456 050 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
-687 500 $-687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 125 000 $-1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $ (200 000 $$200K200 000 $$200K)
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
834 167 $834 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
856 667 $856 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

6 nov. 2023 à 10 h 46
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 2,981
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Would do all of this but tanev is 1RD for sure
6 nov. 2023 à 10 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,209
Mentions "j'aime": 5,209
Quoting: Kinger25
Would do all of this but tanev is 1RD for sure


yes but just playing the model of a good Rielly pair - see Schenn, Boosh with the Leafs - don't play RD1 mins but seems to work well enough pairing Rielly with that type of player, allowing us to form a Brodie - Tanev shutdown pair. Boosh is the RD3 on this team but just playing the chemistry, mins would go Rielly - Tanev - Brodie - Liljegren - McCabe - Boosh in that order
6 nov. 2023 à 10 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,170
Mentions "j'aime": 903
Hey at least you send some semblance of a prospects unlike the moron who posts this trade daily. It's a bad prospect but at least the idea is getting closer.

The Flames taking on Klingberg is strictly a service to the Leafs, there is no need for the Flames to take on another teams garbage at this point. And if it's "to flip him" no one wants him, he was traded for next to nothing last season and has a higher cap hit not than he was traded for last year. If the Flames are selling off for futures they will find a better pick than the Leafs 1st or a closer to NHL ready prospect without doing the other team a big favour.
ReggieTheGoat a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2023 à 11 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,209
Mentions "j'aime": 5,209
Quoting: yycofred
Hey at least you send some semblance of a prospects unlike the moron who posts this trade daily. It's a bad prospect but at least the idea is getting closer.

The Flames taking on Klingberg is strictly a service to the Leafs, there is no need for the Flames to take on another teams garbage at this point. And if it's "to flip him" no one wants him, he was traded for next to nothing last season and has a higher cap hit not than he was traded for last year. If the Flames are selling off for futures they will find a better pick than the Leafs 1st or a closer to NHL ready prospect without doing the other team a big favour.


to me Tanev is worth a late first and I'd be surprised to see you get anything more, and if they're selling off they'll have the cap space to take on Klingberg to make the deal work, so the Leafs send a low-mid level prospect as a thanks for that. This would be at the deadline, so Klingberg would only be on the Flames for like a month and a half - and might actually work as a stopgap so they don't have to rush any young guys up if they sell off 2-3 D at the TDL
6 nov. 2023 à 11 h 21
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,170
Mentions "j'aime": 903
Quoting: leafs101
to me Tanev is worth a late first and I'd be surprised to see you get anything more, and if they're selling off they'll have the cap space to take on Klingberg to make the deal work, so the Leafs send a low-mid level prospect as a thanks for that. This would be at the deadline, so Klingberg would only be on the Flames for like a month and a half - and might actually work as a stopgap so they don't have to rush any young guys up if they sell off 2-3 D at the TDL


They're full of young guys who have been in and out of the line up so far this season DeSimone, Gilbert, Solovyov, Oesterle is a fine stop gap and Poirier has been hurt who is the most NHL ready of all of them. There is no need to shove Klingberg in a line up where he's not needed. Tanev retained at 50% is worth a 1st round pick no doubt about it, the Flames would be better off just taking a pick or a better prospect than taking on Klingberg for a pick that I assume you are thinking will be bottom 5 in the draft. The way Klingberg plays at this rate a low end prospect is not enough to justify a team taking him on. Klingberg to Calgary makes less and less sense every day. Tell your buddy in the comments above, I think he's quick on the ignore list trigger cause he can't take no for an answer.
Voir tout