SalarySwishSalarySwish

Keep it Simple OR Take a Risk

Créé par: Tmclean64
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 31 oct. 2023
Publié: 8 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
The way I see it, the Canucks have two options going forward to accomplish adding a RHD man.

1. Keep it Simple - How I see this playing out is the Canucks either make a hockey trade to free up at least 1M in cap space by trading Beauvillier. Or to waive Beauvillier keeping the fwd depth within the organization and running a 22 man roster while signing Bear to play with Ian Cole. Garland has meshed so well with Suter Im not sure management wants to mess with that third lines success at this point.

2. Take a Risk - The other option would be to pay another team to pry a RHD free who can PK and play Toughs. Think Tanev or Pesce with varying costs. But it wont be cheap since the Canucks don't have cap space, they would need the team to take Beauvillier or Garland back which is likely counterintuitive for the club on the other end of the trade. The idea here would be to add a guy to play Toughs with Hughes while Hronek can feast on a second pairing with Cole.

What path do you think they should take?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 900 000 $
Transactions
VAN
    Chris Tanev
    500k Retention
    CGY
      Anthony Beauvillier
      2024 First Round Pick
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      2025
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      2026
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2283 500 000 $83 284 167 $850 000 $0 $215 833 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      825 000 $825 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
      AD, C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      762 500 $762 500 $
      AD, C
      RFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DG/DD
      NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      775 000 $775 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 150 000 $4 150 000 $ (3 000 000 $$3M3 000 000 $$3M)
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner

      Commentaires populaires

      8 nov. 2023 à 16 h 54
      #1
      VAN
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 6,159
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,880
      Bear me. Love Tanev but not for a first.
      Tmclean64 et Nighthawk a aimé ceci.
      8 nov. 2023 à 16 h 59
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2022
      Messages: 130
      Mentions "j'aime": 84
      I would wait until the 40-50 game point and see how they are doing. If they are showing signs of being legit, and you truly believe in this core, I think you have to go for it. But I wouldn't do that for a UFA. I would hope they made a move like Ottawa did for Chychrun last year. Try to find an age-appropriate, preferably right shot defenseman on a reasonable contract for a few years and pay the price if it doesn't include Lekkerimaki, Willander, or their 2025 1st.

      Use some assets (even thought we don't have a lot) and try to set your core up to contend for the next 3-5 years. That is probably all we have with Miller's age anyways, unless you have another young C on the way at some point in that span...

      Just don't use a prime asset for an expiring contract. It isn't worth it.
      Nighthawk a aimé ceci.
      8 nov. 2023 à 17 h 2
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 2,177
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,134
      Waiving Beauvillier would be stupid IMO.
      8 nov. 2023 à 17 h 26
      #4
      Canucks
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2018
      Messages: 837
      Mentions "j'aime": 349
      Quoting: dfawcett
      I would wait until the 40-50 game point and see how they are doing. If they are showing signs of being legit, and you truly believe in this core, I think you have to go for it. But I wouldn't do that for a UFA. I would hope they made a move like Ottawa did for Chychrun last year. Try to find an age-appropriate, preferably right shot defenseman on a reasonable contract for a few years and pay the price if it doesn't include Lekkerimaki, Willander, or their 2025 1st.

      Use some assets (even thought we don't have a lot) and try to set your core up to contend for the next 3-5 years. That is probably all we have with Miller's age anyways, unless you have another young C on the way at some point in that span...

      Just don't use a prime asset for an expiring contract. It isn't worth it.


      Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
      Waiving Beauvillier would be stupid IMO.


      Issue here is Bear will be looking to sign within the next month so if that is the route Allvin wants to go then he needs to make a trade to free up space sooner than later which seems tough to do as its still early. I love your idea to trade for a Dman that fits long term who fits the timeline of the team. Its just so hard to pry those guys loose and I dont see how they get that guy without moving a top prospect. They will need Willander and Lekkerimaki during the peak OEL buyout years.

      100% agree waiving Beauvillier wouldnt be ideal, but if they cant move him without adding a sweetner then I could see them doing it to improve the team while keeping him in the back pocket if injuries hit. IMO they would rather have Bear on the roster than Beauvillier. Would ideally fill their only hole on the roster.
      Synergy et remowilliams a aimé ceci.
      8 nov. 2023 à 17 h 51
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 2,177
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,134
      Quoting: Tmclean64


      100% agree waiving Beauvillier wouldnt be ideal, but if they cant move him without adding a sweetner then I could see them doing it to improve the team while keeping him in the back pocket if injuries hit. IMO they would rather have Bear on the roster than Beauvillier. Would ideally fill their only hole on the roster.


      Beauvillier would surely get claimed. I know he makes north of 4 million, but someone would take him.
      Voir tout