SalarySwishSalarySwish

My Lines for Opening Night

Créé par: SJSGM
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 11 oct. 2023
Publié: 11 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I know that these aren't the lines and pairings that the Sharks have been so far in practice nor do I expect this at all, but this is what I personally would want

Sharks have been running a top line of Hoffman-Hertl-Zadina for 4 straight days now in practice, which doesn't really make sense to me. You have a lot of great playmakers in the lineup like Eklund, Barabanov, Bordeleau, and Granlund, so why would you have a line of all shooters? Doesn't make sense. Keep Zadina on the top line w/ Hertl so you have the Czechs together and can hopefully unlock Zadina, but switch Hoffman for Eklund so you have a playmaker with those two shooters.
2nd line for me is the same as SJ has been running in practice. Give Bordeleau a legit shot with legit linemates, and hopefully Bordeleau/Barabanov can set up Duclair a lot.
3rd line you have two shooters in Hoffman/Kunin centered by Granlund, who can only pass.
4th line has Sturm/Zetterlund to be solid defensively/physically and Labanc can maybe chip in a bit w/ the goals.
I like Smith but don't know who you'd take out for him

Ferraro-Benning as the top pair which is a brutal top pairing, but gotta work w/ what we have. Both are solid defensively and physically, and can log big minutes.
Thrun-Rutta has been used at practice, hopefully Rutta can provide a steady presence for Thrun and help Thrun develop into a legit middle pairing guy. Thrun might honestly be the best defenseman on the team (which is wild) but I don't want to put him on the top pair right away, be more careful.
Have really liked Knyzhov so far in preseason, a solid/steady defensive bottom pairing with Emberson, who I've also liked.
Vlasic scratched because why should he play over anyone in the lineup? I honestly don't think he's a better player than anyone in the top 6 (and if he is than it's really close) and he's not part of the team's future, so why not give another, younger guy those minutes? You know what you're getting with Burroughs, no upside but definitely like his physicality and defensive play.
Kahkonen starts, he's looked really solid in preseason.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 575 001 $25 000 $1 062 500 $3 924 999 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

11 oct. 2023 à 15 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,275
Mentions "j'aime": 4,680
I am 100% in agreement with your line combos! My only thought is I really feel like Eklund and Bordeleau together! They had chemestry! Same so far with Duclair and Barabanov and Hertl and Zadina. Mixing in Hoffman Granlund and Kunin to mix and match would be nice! It’s way easier once Couture comes back though.

The D I can’t agree more…. But I don’t see how you scratch Vlasic to start the season. (Though I want to!) Maybe after a handful of games, but last year he wasn’t bad so unless he regresses again this year I think Quinn is forced to play him. But to me Knyzhov Embersom and Thrun have to play this year! Thrun I have a feeling is a long term top 4 D for us but with Embersom and Knyzhov we have to see if they are guys you build with or move on from. Personally I feel Knyzhov is a better D than Vlasic and maybe even Ferraro and Embersom could be the best RD we have on the roster right now.

Next year I don’t see how Thrun and Mukhamadulin aren’t playing every night and if the sharks do anything in FA it would be to pick up a RD like Pesce. Or someone who is a top 4 with some offensive ability. So this is the year for Embersom and Knyzhov to shine or move on.

Still don’t know why we signed Burroughs to be honest especially to 3 year deal.
yikes, areax91 et SJSGM a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2023 à 15 h 40
#2
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,100
Mentions "j'aime": 12,840
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I am 100% in agreement with your line combos! My only thought is I really feel like Eklund and Bordeleau together! They had chemestry! Same so far with Duclair and Barabanov and Hertl and Zadina. Mixing in Hoffman Granlund and Kunin to mix and match would be nice! It’s way easier once Couture comes back though.

The D I can’t agree more…. But I don’t see how you scratch Vlasic to start the season. (Though I want to!) Maybe after a handful of games, but last year he wasn’t bad so unless he regresses again this year I think Quinn is forced to play him. But to me Knyzhov Embersom and Thrun have to play this year! Thrun I have a feeling is a long term top 4 D for us but with Embersom and Knyzhov we have to see if they are guys you build with or move on from. Personally I feel Knyzhov is a better D than Vlasic and maybe even Ferraro and Embersom could be the best RD we have on the roster right now.

Next year I don’t see how Thrun and Mukhamadulin aren’t playing every night and if the sharks do anything in FA it would be to pick up a RD like Pesce. Or someone who is a top 4 with some offensive ability. So this is the year for Embersom and Knyzhov to shine or move on.

Still don’t know why we signed Burroughs to be honest especially to 3 year deal.


I hope by mid year :

Eklund - Hertl - Zadina
Couture - Bordeleau - Barabanov
(I’d rather extend Barabanov and trade Duclair)

Trade Duclair for value
Hopefully find some value for Hoffman
Move Labanc

Zetterlund/ Kunin - Granlund - Kunin/ Zetter
Smith - Strum - Trade move

Thrun - Rutta
Ferraro - Benning
Shakir (for a tryout by end year) - Knyzhov

Goalies (like to see Chrona get some reps like Maki)
11 oct. 2023 à 15 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,275
Mentions "j'aime": 4,680
Quoting: yikes
I hope by mid year :

Eklund - Hertl - Zadina
Couture - Bordeleau - Barabanov
(I’d rather extend Barabanov and trade Duclair)

Trade Duclair for value
Hopefully find some value for Hoffman
Move Labanc

Zetterlund/ Kunin - Granlund - Kunin/ Zetter
Smith - Strum - Trade move

Thrun - Rutta
Ferraro - Benning
Shakir (for a tryout by end year) - Knyzhov

Goalies (like to see Chrona get some reps like Maki)


Agree with resigning Barbi! Wouldn’t mind resigning Duclair if he fits well.
I am hoping Kahkonen rebounds like it looked like in preseason and training camp!

I want to be patient with Mukhamadulin! We’ve rushed so many D and destroyed their careers
areax91 a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2023 à 18 h 22
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,100
Mentions "j'aime": 12,840
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Agree with resigning Barbi! Wouldn’t mind resigning Duclair if he fits well.
I am hoping Kahkonen rebounds like it looked like in preseason and training camp!

I want to be patient with Mukhamadulin! We’ve rushed so many D and destroyed their careers


Oh I just mean use his 9 games like Eklund (if he’s performing well). But agreed.

I like to see those 9 games, as while to some it’s a small sample size, I believe if a player has “IT” he’ll show it.

Like Eklund being sent down after his 9 games was the 10/10 correct thing to do. But those 9 games, while not perfect nor being a prospect like Bedard; showed Eklund has it. He now just has to keep it.

I’d like to see Shakir and what we’ve got similarly. Like Thrun showed last year. Thrun could be something (not just a 3rd pair or 4th guy) and that’s what we saw in his showcase. And much like Eklund, Thruns now gotta keep it.

Obviously there are flashes in the pan (Kiviranta for example) but I always like seeing how prospects handle an NHL “vacation” from the AHL.
Rob32sjsharks et areax91 a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2023 à 19 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,275
Mentions "j'aime": 4,680
Quoting: yikes
Oh I just mean use his 9 games like Eklund (if he’s performing well). But agreed.

I like to see those 9 games, as while to some it’s a small sample size, I believe if a player has “IT” he’ll show it.

Like Eklund being sent down after his 9 games was the 10/10 correct thing to do. But those 9 games, while not perfect nor being a prospect like Bedard; showed Eklund has it. He now just has to keep it.

I’d like to see Shakir and what we’ve got similarly. Like Thrun showed last year. Thrun could be something (not just a 3rd pair or 4th guy) and that’s what we saw in his showcase. And much like Eklund, Thruns now gotta keep it.

Obviously there are flashes in the pan (Kiviranta for example) but I always like seeing how prospects handle an NHL “vacation” from the AHL.


Hot damn you and I are very much on the same exact page!
What is your thoughts on Laroque?
areax91 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout