Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 144
Hey Bill, I like the genesis of the trade and the reasoning behind it. I do think Tanev to be a good fit. Couple of considerations I would like to bring forth. The first has to do with Rosen. Certainly contractually there is not, but I wonder if during the courtship of these European FA, there isn't at least some assurances as to movement. It would appear very appealing to come to an organization with both AHL and NHL teams based in the same city, carrying a number of in this case Swedish players, for purposes of language, accommodation, restaurants etc. (I believe between the Leafs and Marlies there are 6). I wonder if moving along a player that was just signed before their first season would be fair game. Would the Canucks be just as satisfied with Andrew Nielsen?
I want to move Kapanen up in the line up as much as anyone. The concept Babcock used in setting up the Kadri line last year was to create a "match up line" (pest type) which should never be confused with a defensive checking line. Komorov definitely fits that bill, not sure that Kappy brings those same qualities. I think that to use Kapanen properly it may take a move in our top 6. I also am not sure that Babcock doesn't feel he still wants Martin in the line up nightly.
Just a couple of thoughts, interested to see what you think as to how it might apply to the solid trade proposed? Too deep for an early Sunday morning?