SalarySwishSalarySwish

My Providence Bruins Lineup Fall 2017

Créé par: TheTown
Équipe: 2017-18 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 28 juill. 2017
Publié: 28 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This is my expected fall lineup for the 2017/2018 Providence Bruins.

Of Note: D. Heinen and J. DeBrusk make the Big Club out of camp. That's a damn fine lineup!!!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $65 925 000 $0 $2 135 000 $9 075 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
916 667 $916 667 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD
UFA - 3
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG
RFA - 3
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
742 500 $742 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
784 167 $784 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
655 000 $655 000 $
C
RFA - 1
808 750 $808 750 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
767 500 $767 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance207 500 $$208K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
858 750 $858 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
G
UFA - 3
784 167 $784 167 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 juill. 2017 à 14 h 6
#1
ItsInTheNet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,436
Mentions "j'aime": 89
It's looking right now like Bjork has the highest chance to make the NHL of any of our wingers. Not really sure how you have DeBrusk beating him out and am guessing you're basically just assuming that DeBrusk is better because he played in a professional league last year. I think Bjork is better than Heinen and Debrusk by a wide margin. Bjork could get AHL time, but he'd likely demolish the league in a matter of 10 to 15 games, proving he was NHL ready. I think he signed with us because we told him he would be in the competition for a top 9 role this season. He's done nothing but impress everyone who's watched him thus far. I don't understand how that equates to him losing the battle against either Heinen or DeBrusk. Bjork is in the lead right now with all the momentum he's created. Heinen is slightly behind, but also a solid option. DeBrusk has the longest odds and although he's a good player, is likely going to be a "go-to" guy on the P Bruins. This will only be his 2nd AHL season and he regressed in the CHL the year after he was drafted. It would be a better option to see if he can build on his first year of experience and prove he's gotten better. I think he's good, but he's the least ready of the 3 to be depended on in the big league.
28 juill. 2017 à 14 h 53
#2
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Quoting: TopCornerShot
It's looking right now like Bjork has the highest chance to make the NHL of any of our wingers. Not really sure how you have DeBrusk beating him out and am guessing you're basically just assuming that DeBrusk is better because he played in a professional league last year. I think Bjork is better than Heinen and Debrusk by a wide margin. Bjork could get AHL time, but he'd likely demolish the league in a matter of 10 to 15 games, proving he was NHL ready. I think he signed with us because we told him he would be in the competition for a top 9 role this season. He's done nothing but impress everyone who's watched him thus far. I don't understand how that equates to him losing the battle against either Heinen or DeBrusk. Bjork is in the lead right now with all the momentum he's created. Heinen is slightly behind, but also a solid option. DeBrusk has the longest odds and although he's a good player, is likely going to be a "go-to" guy on the P Bruins. This will only be his 2nd AHL season and he regressed in the CHL the year after he was drafted. It would be a better option to see if he can build on his first year of experience and prove he's gotten better. I think he's good, but he's the least ready of the 3 to be depended on in the big league.


Debrusk didn't regress the year after he was drafted. He suffered a serious lower body injury. He took a puck to the nuts after he went to block a shot and one swelled up the size of a tennis ball. He rushed himself back from the injury that year and stated he wasn't fully healthy until that season's development camp for Boston. He then goes out and has a solid first season with the Providence Bruins. To say he's the least ready of the 3 is quite comical to me. Honestly, there is no wrong answer when saying Debrusk/Heinen/Bjork could make the team.
goldie078 et TheTown a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2017 à 15 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Whether it's Debrusk, Heinen or Bjork that makes the big B's the Baby B's still look pretty good. Lots of great young talent that will hopefully mature into great players for the big B's!
28 juill. 2017 à 15 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,873
Mentions "j'aime": 163
Quoting: TopCornerShot
It's looking right now like Bjork has the highest chance to make the NHL of any of our wingers. Not really sure how you have DeBrusk beating him out and am guessing you're basically just assuming that DeBrusk is better because he played in a professional league last year. I think Bjork is better than Heinen and Debrusk by a wide margin. Bjork could get AHL time, but he'd likely demolish the league in a matter of 10 to 15 games, proving he was NHL ready. I think he signed with us because we told him he would be in the competition for a top 9 role this season. He's done nothing but impress everyone who's watched him thus far. I don't understand how that equates to him losing the battle against either Heinen or DeBrusk. Bjork is in the lead right now with all the momentum he's created. Heinen is slightly behind, but also a solid option. DeBrusk has the longest odds and although he's a good player, is likely going to be a "go-to" guy on the P Bruins. This will only be his 2nd AHL season and he regressed in the CHL the year after he was drafted. It would be a better option to see if he can build on his first year of experience and prove he's gotten better. I think he's good, but he's the least ready of the 3 to be depended on in the big league.


Not sure why I have to repeat always but........

Bjork has 0 "Bruin" experience. I want to see him demolish the AHL first. That's why its there!!!! It's a proving ground!!!!
He has only played American College which is inferior to Canadian Junior leagues so I'm sure he has impressed because the player calibre is lower.
As I have said many times, Bjork may have more pure talent than Heinen or DeBrusk but the latter have "PRO" experience and both did very well in the last half of last year!!!
They are dependable from coaches aspect.
They know the Bruin system. Bjork has never played in the Bruin system. Even Backes struggled learning the Bruins system!!
28 juill. 2017 à 15 h 25
#5
ItsInTheNet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,436
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: TopCornerShot
It's looking right now like Bjork has the highest chance to make the NHL of any of our wingers. Not really sure how you have DeBrusk beating him out and am guessing you're basically just assuming that DeBrusk is better because he played in a professional league last year. I think Bjork is better than Heinen and Debrusk by a wide margin. Bjork could get AHL time, but he'd likely demolish the league in a matter of 10 to 15 games, proving he was NHL ready. I think he signed with us because we told him he would be in the competition for a top 9 role this season. He's done nothing but impress everyone who's watched him thus far. I don't understand how that equates to him losing the battle against either Heinen or DeBrusk. Bjork is in the lead right now with all the momentum he's created. Heinen is slightly behind, but also a solid option. DeBrusk has the longest odds and although he's a good player, is likely going to be a "go-to" guy on the P Bruins. This will only be his 2nd AHL season and he regressed in the CHL the year after he was drafted. It would be a better option to see if he can build on his first year of experience and prove he's gotten better. I think he's good, but he's the least ready of the 3 to be depended on in the big league.


Debrusk didn't regress the year after he was drafted. He suffered a serious lower body injury. He took a puck to the nuts after he went to block a shot and one swelled up the size of a tennis ball. He rushed himself back from the injury that year and stated he wasn't fully healthy until that season's development camp for Boston. He then goes out and has a solid first season with the Providence Bruins. To say he's the least ready of the 3 is quite comical to me. Honestly, there is no wrong answer when saying Debrusk/Heinen/Bjork could make the team.


No he regressed in finding the back of the net. I even read that fact in a major hockey publication. Surely you are not better than they? Or you think you are Brekel?, the high and mighty Brekel who's paid not a cent for his words, but thinks that they are law. Quite unwise to have me deal with you again my friend. Everything you do is hilarious to me because theres never enough behind it. It's as if you do a manual labor type job, yet strive to be perceived as a white collar intellectual.

There are less right answers at this moment of time in saying who will make the team and who will not, because some are more unlikely than others. We are judging these mocks by their perceptual merit and therefore some can be determined as better than others. That is how this site works Brekel, that is how you decide what amount of stars to give to each participant. Are you unaware of this concept entirely my buddy? Is this such a complex notion that if you pick the guy who has a 20% chance to make a team and omit the guy who has a 90% chance to make a team, that you are being unrealistic and deserve less awards?

Brekel I will not try to take your opinion away from you, but you simply are not as right as you think you are and I believe you're in the business of always trying to be right. It's very hilarious when I read your posts, I enjoy them to the maximum.
nobody a aimé ceci.
Voir tout