SalarySwishSalarySwish

Reeling in a Giant Cat-fish

Créé par: KrakenTheCode
Équipe: 2023-24 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 27 juin 2023
Publié: 27 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
In this final installment of a four part series, with the NHL draft right around the corner, I will explore one final major addition the Kraken could make to their roster via trade this offseason.

Trade Target: Alex DeBrincat, LW, Ottawa Senators

Fit with Seattle: DeBrincat's calling card is his goalscoring, which would undoubtedly be welcome in Seattle. The Kraken had great success with their scoring by committee approach last season, and adding a sniper of DeBrincat's caliber would greatly enhance that. He had a down season last year but was a 40+ goalscorer previously in his career. However, DeBrincat also contributes in the playmaking and defensive departments, and that's key for fitting in on a Seattle team that values two-way forwards. On the Kraken, DeBrincat would slot into the top six, meaning Schwartz slides down into the bottom six and one of the bottom six forwards, in this case Sprong, would be dealt to clear roster space.

Making the money work: At first, getting DeBrincat onto the roster was more complicated, even more so than fitting Karlsson onto the roster. This is because Seattle has quite a few decently paid forwards, and DeBrincat will be making quite a lot on a new deal. I was looking at moving sending one of them to Ottawa, but I couldn't find anyone making enough that both A) Seattle would be willing to trade and B) Held enough trade value for Ottawa. Eventually I figured out a workaround by sending Sprong to Ottawa as a replacement goalscoring forward and salary dumping Driedger. This didn't end up leaving any wiggle room to externally replace Soucy on the defense, but a Fleury/Megna tandem could probably hold down the fort until Ryker Evans is ready. These moves left enough space to extend DeBrincat. For the record, I think Seattle would only trade for DeBrincat if they were able to get him inked to a long-term contract; if he ends up playing on a one year QO, they wouldn't make this deal.

Let me know your thoughts, as always helpful feedback is welcome. The draft is tomorrow, the fireworks will begin soon!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 000 000 $
42 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
88 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 100 000 $
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. DeBrincat, Alex [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Sprong, Daniel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
Détails additionnels:
Ottawa is a team looking on the rise, so they'd probably want at least one piece who could contribute to their team right away. Sprong provides that as a RW who, while not on DeBrincat's level, was a 20+ goalscorer last season and would help replace some of his scoring. The Sens also get the 20th overall pick in a good draft and a future third, which when coupled with Sprong means they recoup most of what they paid for DeBrincat last year.
2.
SEA
    Future Considerations
    CHI
    1. Driedger, Chris
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
    Détails additionnels:
    This sort of situation, where Seattle adds a high-priced player, is about the only one where they'd need to trade Driedger to shed salary. In this case a team gets an asset to take on Driedger's cap, and Driedger gets a chance to re-establish himself as an NHL goalie with a rebuilding club. Chicago is the team here, but this could be any team in the middle of a rebuild with cap space to spare.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SEA
    2024
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de CGY
    2025
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 500 000 $80 606 576 $129 910 $1 850 000 $2 893 424 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
    C, AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    859 167 $859 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    897 500 $897 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    918 333 $918 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance3 062 500 $$3M)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    870 000 $870 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    27 juin 2023 à 13 h 59
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 847
    Mentions "j'aime": 967
    CHI would probably do this. Can't see why not.
    27 juin 2023 à 13 h 59
    #2
    Save Mcdavid
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 2,908
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,257
    Personally if I was Seattle I would move one of those top 6 wingers for a top-4 d-man Kartye and Wright should get some consistent middle 6 playing time next year and I don't l o v e that d-core going up against high power offensive groups like the Avs or Oilers. Seattle already has the best offensive depth in the league they can afford moving out one of Burakovsky,Eberle,Bjorkstrand,Schwartz, Gourde or Wenberg for a top-4 RD to just put them in a much better position.
    27 juin 2023 à 14 h 37
    #3
    See you space cowboy
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 2,085
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,155
    You always have the best names for ACGM posts.
    27 juin 2023 à 14 h 48
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 1,234
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,525
    Quoting: ginandtacos
    CHI would probably do this. Can't see why not.


    Except for the fact that they have 4 goalies under contract and the GM of the Hawks said they are not looking to add a goalie in the offseason.
    27 juin 2023 à 15 h 20
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 780
    Mentions "j'aime": 490
    Quoting: Drshnuckels91
    Personally if I was Seattle I would move one of those top 6 wingers for a top-4 d-man Kartye and Wright should get some consistent middle 6 playing time next year and I don't l o v e that d-core going up against high power offensive groups like the Avs or Oilers. Seattle already has the best offensive depth in the league they can afford moving out one of Burakovsky,Eberle,Bjorkstrand,Schwartz, Gourde or Wenberg for a top-4 RD to just put them in a much better position.


    Seattle has the future assets and cap flexibility to add a top-four defenseman without sacrificing a piece of the top six, so I think if they do go after someone of that ilk, they'll be more inclined to keep their group of forwards together at least for the time being. Having a lot of forward depth is never a bad thing; injuries happen, so if the Kraken have guys like Kartye and Wright who can step up and provide good production, so much the better.
    NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
    Voir tout