SalarySwishSalarySwish

Only 1 move is fine

Créé par: worldwidesensei
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 25 juin 2023
Publié: 25 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
No one reads the description. Dumba isn't necessarily important here. It can be any capable D-man. Anoyher LHD like SOucy would be a great add too. There is a huge misnomer about BUF D. More in the comments, cuz if you've read this far you're in the minority.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $73 477 737 $0 $4 570 000 $10 022 263 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

25 juin 2023 à 1 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,344
Mentions "j'aime": 2,130
The idea that they dont need another goalie is totally bonkers. I know im the doomer on this site but even the people who think im a clown for it agree with me. Both luukkonen and comrie were bottom 5 in almost every goaltending advanced stat out there. Even if you believe in luukkonen's potential despite the dual hip surgery limiting his mobility, the idea that a team thats missed the playoffs 13 years in a row can run it back with two goalies who were that bad last year is a ludicrous amount of risk to carry when you allegedly have such a stacked pool of talent and surplus to trade from. its just totally unserious.
Fjordy a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2023 à 1 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Despite the constant cried for a "top-4" D-man and/or a G, these cries are mostly unjustified. KA took to the mic to make that clear as well. He's staying the course.

Further, our team is pretty damn good when Samuelsson is in the line-up. 33-18-4, or a .636, or a 104 point pace.

Now, Samuelsson would need to stay healthy all year and at this point, he looks like a player that will miss about 10-20 games a year, at least. So we need depth, but it doesn't necessarily need to be the "top-4" variety, although that would make us scary good and we have the assets to acquire one. I just don't think that is up KA's sleeve, as he won't mortgage the future to "win-now". Look for him to make a low-key D depth add or too. A UFA in the $4-6mm range would be a huge add, at the cost of no other assets than cap space. Some names to consider: Mayfield, Soucy, Dumba, Ceci, Myers...

There's plenty of routes BUF can go, but BUF is in the situation where doing little to nothing is way better than making changes for the sake of making changes and/or mortgaging the future.

5v5:
Sammy-Dahlin 39GF 31GA 55.71GF%
Power-Joker 38 38 50
Power-Boosh 5 4 55.56

That's not great, but definitely good, especially considering the record with Samuelsson in the line-up.

When Dahlin and/or Power is on the ice 5v5:

153GF 138GA

And these players are only going to be getting better.

When neither was on the ice?

44GF 66GA

So as much as BUF fans want another solid-top 4 guy, getting a (or 2) better 5-6-7 guy than Bryson(59GP), Clague(33), Fitzgerald (23), Stillman(18), Pilut(17),Davies (1), would probably make just as big of a difference...at a much cheaper cost. Joker and/or Boosh are more than capable of a top-4 role with the rising power of Power.

BUF just needs more D-depth. Whether it's a solid "top-4", or a solid "5-6-7", both will have a huge impact. The ccost to acquire a 5-6-7 i just much, much cheaper.
25 juin 2023 à 2 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Quoting: Stadel
The idea that they dont need another goalie is totally bonkers. I know im the doomer on this site but even the people who think im a clown for it agree with me. Both luukkonen and comrie were bottom 5 in almost every goaltending advanced stat out there. Even if you believe in luukkonen's potential despite the dual hip surgery limiting his mobility, the idea that a team thats missed the playoffs 13 years in a row can run it back with two goalies who were that bad last year is a ludicrous amount of risk to carry when you allegedly have such a stacked pool of talent and surplus to trade from. its just totally unserious.


Most goalies around the league would have had similar numbers. The D hung them out to dry.

UPL + Levi: 17-11-4 + 5-2-0 = 22-6-4, or .615, or 101 points. They have already proven they can win. Sure, it's a small sample size. But KA has already come out and said he trusts his 3 goalies, and rightly so.
25 juin 2023 à 2 h 4
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,344
Mentions "j'aime": 2,130
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Most goalies around the league would have had similar numbers. The D hung them out to dry.

UPL + Levi: 17-11-4 + 5-2-0 = 22-6-4, or .615, or 101 points. They have already proven they can win. Sure, it's a small sample size. But KA has already come out and said he trusts his 3 goalies, and rightly so.


You're saying the D is a misnomer for how bad it was, but then youre saying the D hung out the goalies to dry. If thats the case, why are you measuring goaltending by wins and losses, a stat driven by TEAM success. The wins UPL has a Sabres, majority of them came when the team was on a shooting bender, scoring an unsustainable amount of goals per game. It's a recipe for disaster
25 juin 2023 à 2 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Quoting: Stadel
You're saying the D is a misnomer for how bad it was, but then youre saying the D hung out the goalies to dry. If thats the case, why are you measuring goaltending by wins and losses, a stat driven by TEAM success. The wins UPL has a Sabres, majority of them came when the team was on a shooting bender, scoring an unsustainable amount of goals per game. It's a recipe for disaster


That's just not true. UPL went 10-2-0 for a 12-game stretch, posting a .915 sv%.
Went 12-3 for a 15-game stretch posting a .909.

The real troubles were when we lost Sammy...and to a lesser extent Joker and/or Boosh.
Voir tout