SalarySwishSalarySwish

Proper 3rd Line

Créé par: cheeky3468
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 janv. 2023
Publié: 10 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Gaudette, Adam
  2. Simmonds, Wayne
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
PHI
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Voit, Ty
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $79 586 246 $212 500 $0 $2 913 754 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
450 000 $450 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
840 630 $840 630 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

10 janv. 2023 à 10 h 43
#1
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,035
Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
The Bjugstad trade I feel Arizona will get a better haul. Really you’re just giving them a 4th. Gaudette and Simmonds have no value. I would be fine with adding Bjugstad for depth

The Laughton trade. Well you’re certainly giving up a lot for him. Objectively, what does he bring to the table that Kerfoot doesn’t? Kerfoot is fantastic on the PK. He plays all over the lineup. Laughton does as well. But he is on a very weak team. So are his numbers in any category inflated because of this? He’s also been injured quite a bit the past few years. So taking him on for 3 years carries a higher risk.
10 janv. 2023 à 10 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,234
Bjugstad isnt anything special, but I think Gaudette and Simmonds together have negative value.

PHI deal: about right, (depends on what you think of Voit to be fair: if you view him as a high mid level prospect than maybe), but its a deep draft and PHI would probably rather have 2 2nds for Laughton, or a 2nd and 3rd and prospect kind of thing.

And Kerfoot probably carries little to no value to PHI, as an expiring UFA especially with little time at TDL and Kerfoots NTC to move him for any value. Ultimately if this is done at the TDL, no need to move Kerfoot in this deal, maybe add a 4th instead. And your 3rd line becomes better with Kerfoot-Laughton-Engvall/Kampf/Knies

But Laughton would be a great addition for the leafs.
10 janv. 2023 à 10 h 47
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,234
Quoting: DrDinkiee
The Bjugstad trade I feel Arizona will get a better haul. Really you’re just giving them a 4th. Gaudette and Simmonds have no value. I would be fine with adding Bjugstad for depth

The Laughton trade. Well you’re certainly giving up a lot for him. Objectively, what does he bring to the table that Kerfoot doesn’t? Kerfoot is fantastic on the PK. He plays all over the lineup. Laughton does as well. But he is on a very weak team. So are his numbers in any category inflated because of this? He’s also been injured quite a bit the past few years. So taking him on for 3 years carries a higher risk.


Partly true on Laughton, but the fact he plays a more physical game than Kerfoot and performs offensively on a bad team that cant score, probably means Laughton gets 40+ in Toronto. Also Laughton is a long term solution.

But really Kerfoot and Laughton together on 3rd line, makes a better 3rd line and both could play in the top 6 too.
Faulk_my_Dzingel a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 10 h 52
#4
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,035
Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
Quoting: Hammerwise
Partly true on Laughton, but the fact he plays a more physical game than Kerfoot and performs offensively on a bad team that cant score, probably means Laughton gets 40+ in Toronto. Also Laughton is a long term solution.

But really Kerfoot and Laughton together on 3rd line, makes a better 3rd line and both could play in the top 6 too.


I guess if we’re going just scoring wise, everyone needs to realize that Kerfoot has been .5 P/G all the way through his Leaf tenure. He’s also been fantastic in playoffs.
My point with this is is it worth giving up a solid prospect in Voit our 2023 1st and getting rid of Kerfoot for Laughton who maybe, maybe, is slightly better than Kerfoot? I say play the year out with him. S
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 10 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Bjugstad would be worse than anyone on the leafs regular roster on the 3rd line and Laughton doesnt get anything close to that much in a return
Voir tout