SalarySwishSalarySwish

Some defensive changes

Créé par: Lactic_Flaccid
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 18 août 2022
Publié: 18 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Ducks get a RD prospect to help fill the gaps when they inevitably trade Klingberg/Shattenkirk. You can throw Vaak on the right side at the deadline and let Juolevi and Zellweger to get some 3D NHL time. They get a stop-gap LD while their prospects develop and I think having Reilly partner either Drysdale or one of the younger defenseman will help their development along. Take on the Lehner contract which is a controversial choice for sure, but if the Ducks are open to it, it sets their defense up fairly well. The forward group, while mostly unchanged, has room for growth and they will still have the cap space to make an exciting free agent signing after the season which sets them up well to start pushing for a playoff spot in 23-24 with the ulimate goal to be competitive in 24-25. Hesitancy to part with Benoit or Vaak, but Reilly as a two year guy seems like a good option for the Ducks and they do not need both Benoit and Vaak, really just need one.

Boston saves cap space and sheds some depth for futures. The hope here is that Vegas sees an opportunity to get Gibson while shedding the Lehner contract and does Vegas things and sheds prospects and picks for the right here right now. While the trade package could certainly look a lot different, I think a base of Korzcak and Brisson is a good start. Tell me why these trades would never happen and how you would change them.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Reilly, Mike
Détails additionnels:
Probably a deadline deal while Boston gets healthy on the backend.
BOS
  1. Benoit, Simon
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Could replace Benoit with Vaakaneinen if Boston wants him back?
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de VGK
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3182 500 000 $60 520 417 $0 $4 332 500 $21 979 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
866 667 $866 667 $
DG
RFA - 4
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
847 500 $847 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

18 août 2022 à 22 h 31
#1
Sway4Vezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 809
Mentions "j'aime": 361
Boston will gladly take a pick and a prospect back. I really was starting to like Vaakanainen so getting him back would be nice.
18 août 2022 à 22 h 45
#2
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,454
Mentions "j'aime": 2,919
I don’t think there’s any trade with VGK where taking back Lehner makes sense if he’s going to play again. Two extra years of 5M of an older goalie with significant injury history is not ideal to open the competitive window. That’ll be two 5+M guys with significant injury history on the roster next season after re-signing Z, Terry, Drysdale etc.

Also if Helleson has a solid season he’ll probably have a good shot at making the team next year. Don’t know a ton about either but Helleson looks like a similar player to Korczak with similar upside based on draft spots. Plus there’s quite a few decent possible UFAs available or use the assets accumulated to make a more significant addition than a mid level prospect.

I think we all agree we wanna see this team take a solid step this year so next offseason is about becoming a playoff team and growing from there. Just think there’s better ways to accomplish that then helping a division rival stay competitive right now.
Lactic_Flaccid a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 22 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,049
Mentions "j'aime": 13,117
Both trades are an L for the Ducks imo
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 23 h 29
#4
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,918
Mentions "j'aime": 7,755
I would burn down the Honda center before I sent Gibson to rot in Vegas. I don't care that it's steel and rock and ice, I'll find a way to do it.

The reason we have Benoit and Vaak is the same reason we have Zelwegger and Mintyukov, to see who is the better player and move the other. Maybe is Vaak is the odd man he is 7th D since he goes both ways.

Trading one of them for Reilly is flying in the face of the youth movement. We are still rebuilding, there is no reason to trade out the youth to get older to speed things up by one year. If we feel neither Vaak or Benoit are a fit, we go shopping next off-season when half the league is in free agency.

You are also trading out the only reason to try and accelerate the rebuild. The only reason to rush things is to try and use the prime years of Gibson (other than the ticket sales argument). Getting Lehner puts our window opening in question and likely delays it over standing pat. Don't get me wrong, Lehner seems like a great dude, but an age 31 goalie coming off of major hip surgery that looses him an entire season, that Vegas forced to play injured, that contract is going to age like milk.

You build dynasties through the draft, the only reason to ship out the youth is to keep a cup window open. The kids need time to simmer and meld at the NHL level, and we have everything we need for a great team for several years in our farm system, we don't even need all of them to hit, since we have duplicates of basically every position available.

Be patient, and in Verbeek we trust.
18 août 2022 à 23 h 53
#5
Sway4Vezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 809
Mentions "j'aime": 361
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I would burn down the Honda center before I sent Gibson to rot in Vegas. I don't care that it's steel and rock and ice, I'll find a way to do it.

The reason we have Benoit and Vaak is the same reason we have Zelwegger and Mintyukov, to see who is the better player and move the other. Maybe is Vaak is the odd man he is 7th D since he goes both ways.

Trading one of them for Reilly is flying in the face of the youth movement. We are still rebuilding, there is no reason to trade out the youth to get older to speed things up by one year. If we feel neither Vaak or Benoit are a fit, we go shopping next off-season when half the league is in free agency.

You are also trading out the only reason to try and accelerate the rebuild. The only reason to rush things is to try and use the prime years of Gibson (other than the ticket sales argument). Getting Lehner puts our window opening in question and likely delays it over standing pat. Don't get me wrong, Lehner seems like a great dude, but an age 31 goalie coming off of major hip surgery that looses him an entire season, that Vegas forced to play injured, that contract is going to age like milk.

You build dynasties through the draft, the only reason to ship out the youth is to keep a cup window open. The kids need time to simmer and meld at the NHL level, and we have everything we need for a great team for several years in our farm system, we don't even need all of them to hit, since we have duplicates of basically every position available.

Be patient, and in Verbeek we trust.


If anything, getting Reilly is like getting Strome but on defense. It’a filling a need they have. I think they’d rather have a veteran be playing with Drysdale. It’ll help the defense’s development and give it a higher level of competition. Making that trade is not accelerating the rebuild completely. Maybe it’s better to just trade a pick not a defenseman too but this move would be helpful and low risk.
Voir tout