SalarySwishSalarySwish

Checkin in

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 18 avr. 2022
Publié: 18 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Am I wrong about Dach yet? Just checking in…..

If so, what’s his value?
Transactions
CHI
    You tell me
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2481 500 000 $63 562 547 $452 439 $397 500 $17 937 453 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance307 500 $$308K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    880 833 $880 833 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    866 667 $866 667 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    18 avr. 2022 à 23 h 35
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 3,238
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,177
    Its unfortunate he lost a whole year of his development playing under a coach that doesnt know what he's doing because management refused to find a better coach than colliton in the offseason. You see how bad Caufield was under Ducharme? Thats Dach under King. Coaches matter
    Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
    19 avr. 2022 à 0 h 18
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    Quoting: SlickWilly
    Its unfortunate he lost a whole year of his development playing under a coach that doesnt know what he's doing because management refused to find a better coach than colliton in the offseason. You see how bad Caufield was under Ducharme? Thats Dach under King. Coaches matter


    Hes a bigger body also. A patient route is needed with his development. Still 21 and had a lot thrown at him from a young age and was rushed into the majors.
    19 avr. 2022 à 11 h 9
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 3,238
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,177
    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
    Hes a bigger body also. A patient route is needed with his development. Still 21 and had a lot thrown at him from a young age and was rushed into the majors.


    I dont even necessarily know that patience is the word to use here. If we want the rebuild to be successful, we need a coach who can actually DEVELOP young guys. Colliton helped with defensive development, but they need someone to help teach them how to advance their skills. Savard was perfect for Kane and toews for breaking them into the show. Quenneville helped develop them further. You're seeing Marty St Louis turn Caufield into a star by actually teaching him how to get better and hone his skills. Colliton was a system over skills guy, and Derek King doesnt know what hes doing at all. There's a reason virtually every single one of our young prospects has busted if Kane didnt take them to his skills coach over the summer.
    Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
    19 avr. 2022 à 19 h 19
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    Quoting: SlickWilly
    I dont even necessarily know that patience is the word to use here. If we want the rebuild to be successful, we need a coach who can actually DEVELOP young guys. Colliton helped with defensive development, but they need someone to help teach them how to advance their skills. Savard was perfect for Kane and toews for breaking them into the show. Quenneville helped develop them further. You're seeing Marty St Louis turn Caufield into a star by actually teaching him how to get better and hone his skills. Colliton was a system over skills guy, and Derek King doesnt know what hes doing at all. There's a reason virtually every single one of our young prospects has busted if Kane didnt take them to his skills coach over the summer.


    I agree its a coaching thing also though I still feel a level of patience is needed with Dach, I don't think we will see the best of him until his mid 20's which is fine while we are developing and not being competitive but your right, we need a coach that can harness these young guys coming through.
    20 avr. 2022 à 8 h 25
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 2,351
    Mentions "j'aime": 851
    Quoting: SlickWilly
    Its unfortunate he lost a whole year of his development playing under a coach that doesnt know what he's doing because management refused to find a better coach than colliton in the offseason. You see how bad Caufield was under Ducharme? Thats Dach under King. Coaches matter


    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
    Hes a bigger body also. A patient route is needed with his development. Still 21 and had a lot thrown at him from a young age and was rushed into the majors.


    Only reason I’m asking the question now is because long back when I said he was the wrong pick, others said you gotta give it three and we’ll see where others are compared to him. Well, we’re at that point and I can name ten players in that draft we’d have been better off with let alone are indeed better than Dach.
    Voir tout