SalarySwishSalarySwish

TDL

Créé par: TheWomper
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 mars 2022
Publié: 19 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Chara, Zdeno
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. MacEwen, Zack
  2. Sandin, Linus
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
  4. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
BUF
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
4.
ARI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 916 449 $0 $1 150 000 $3 583 551 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
834 167 $834 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
785 000 $785 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

19 mars 2022 à 8 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 459
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Why would the Islanders downgrade a draft pick and take Dermott when they can just get a late pick for Chara? Dermott isn't improving the Islanders defense.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2022 à 9 h 2
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
I think the Leafs want to upgrade their roster at the TDL, not downgrade
palhal a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2022 à 11 h 4
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: QualityTrades1
I think the Leafs want to upgrade their roster at the TDL, not downgrade
Watch the highlights of the Flames/Sabre game. https://www.nhl.com/video/buf--cgy/t-277350912/c-10997050
Then watch the highlights of the Leafs/Coyotes game. https://www.nhl.com/video/ari--tor/t-277350912/c-10878724
Mrázek has allowed 17 goals his last 3 and half games, 4.85 GA
Try real hard to convince your self that Dustin would be a down grade over Petr.
Just taking Mrázek's contract would cost more than a second, adding Dustin more again.

Crouse is Kadri lite, and for a second would be a good add on.
Chara adds the playoff experience and leadership that appears to be lacking, for Dermott who is absolutely the worse of all Leaf defensemen.
I have not checked for this post but last week Dermott has the lowest ice time, no PP, low PK, lowest hits, lowest Blocked shots, fewest goal, fewest points of any TML D-man.
No one will give up a anything for him.

I do not know enough of the Flyer trade, but you could be correct as Kerfoot seems to be the whipping boy of the Leaf fans.
Maybe they expected him to be producing as if he was Kadri's replacement.

@TheWomper
But Tokarski, Chara and Crouse are all upgrades.
19 mars 2022 à 11 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Watch the highlights of the Flames/Sabre game. https://www.nhl.com/video/buf--cgy/t-277350912/c-10997050
Then watch the highlights of the Leafs/Coyotes game. https://www.nhl.com/video/ari--tor/t-277350912/c-10878724
Mrázek has allowed 17 goals his last 3 and half games, 4.85 GA
Try real hard to convince your self that Dustin would be a down grade over Petr.
Just taking Mrázek's contract would cost more than a second, adding Dustin more again.

Crouse is Kadri lite, and for a second would be a good add on.
Chara adds the playoff experience and leadership that appears to be lacking, for Dermott who is absolutely the worse of all Leaf defensemen.
I have not checked for this post but last week Dermott has the lowest ice time, no PP, low PK, lowest hits, lowest Blocked shots, fewest goal, fewest points of any TML D-man.
No one will give up a anything for him.

I do not know enough of the Flyer trade, but you could be correct as Kerfoot seems to be the whipping boy of the Leaf fans.
Maybe they expected him to be producing as if he was Kadri's replacement.

TheWomper
But Tokarski, Chara and Crouse are all upgrades.


This is such a weird argument but you did a great job of breaking down your points so I'll break mine down the same.

1) You can't talk about Chara having playoff experience as a 3rd pairing defenseman and then argue that Tokarski's 68 game NHL career with 0 playoff games is somehow more reliable Mrazek's almost 300 game sample size with playoff experience on top of that. Yeah Mrazek is having a bad season, but I'll take the playoff experienced goalie with a better career over a guy with a 0.905 SV% and 3+ GAA.

2) I agree that Crouse is a good add to a team that needs this type of player, but he's an RFA that the Leafs most likely will not be able to pay and Arizona is going to want more than a 2nd for him.

3) Dermott is a 6th/7th guy. Of course he has the lowest blocked shots, goals (which, who even cares?), and points. He's here to replace others for days off and injuries. I can see him being moved, but the Leafs need to address a Muzzin replacement for the time being and IMO Chara isn't it. (I am willing to admit that I may be off with this point and an extra defenseman like Chara may be what they need, but it's hard to argue that this will make the Leafs 'better' overall)

4) The worst point is definitely Kerfoot. We are literally giving the higher pick to receive two players of lower value. Overall just really bad on that one. Quantity does not equal quality
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
Voir tout