SalarySwishSalarySwish

Pre and post deadline

Créé par: SlickWilly
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2022
Publié: 12 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
My pre-deadline lineup :

Debrincat-Reichel-Dach
Kubalik-Toews-Kane
Strome-Borgstrom-Hagel
Khaira-Entwistle-Kurashev

I probably wouldnt put Reichel at center, but it seems king is intent on doing so, so I will run with that. the 1st line is basically "okay, you're our future for the moment. Build some chemistry" and everything else follows based on whos left. Defensively I would build it
De Haan-Jones
McCabe-Murphy
Stillman/C.Jones-Galvas

Galvas proved he is useful and worth investing resources for his future, so we can give him some all situations minutes while still keeping him somewhat sheltered.

Post deadline :
Dont think I have to explain the EDM trade, its been around before. Value isnt the main point of it at the moment. Yamamoto can probably be swapped with any solid prospect that isnt holloway

FLA trade : I've seen some rumblings here and there about them looking for a defenseman, and as a UFA who has played well this season, he makes sense if youre not looking to give up a big investment after already giving up your first and second rounders for this year. Some salary can probably be retained as well.

CGY : You took Gus last year, here he is for even cheaper this year. He started off slow but before he hit the protocols hes quietly been one of our better defensemen analytically. I dont expect much but get him out of my face because we arent re-signing him

Now for the only trade on here that doesnt HAVE to happen : Kubalik to Anaheim. Now im not really sure on what the return would be, given his down season, but it certainly wouldnt be a top prospect like Mason McTavish. I think Kubalik makes sense for the Ducks for a few reasons here. 1. He is a pure goal scorer with a 30 goal season under his belt to match Zegras's playmaking. 2/3 go hand in hand, with 2 being that the Ducks currently find themselves in the mix for the postseason, so adding at the deadline to try and sneak in and make a splash may make sense, but 3 Kubalik is an RFA, so its not a single season investment for a young and upcoming team, and the Ducks are one of the few teams where cap wont be a problem AND it makes sense for them to trade for him at the deadline. Either way, I havent included a return because its not the main point of this post, and its probably not gonna happen. I'd like to hear comments from Ducks fans on how he would fit on your team.

And then below is my lineup post deadline trades : only main points to note are that Kosk can be the backup to Lank, who is hoping to get his groove back for next season, and Galvas can get some more minutes in replace of De Haan

Let me know what you think. Getting everyone out for a good price at the deadline might be a little wishful, but if we arent close to the playoffs, it has to happen for the future of the club
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
I imagine they probably dont want to give up their 3rd rounder for this year and be without a pick for 3 rounds in a row
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
You took him last year. Here he is for even cheaper this time. Can be anyone else who wants him
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Any contending team looking for a depth pick up
4.
CHI
    Return to be determined
    5.
    CHI
    1. Koskinen, Mikko
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    EDM
    1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $59 980 880 $452 439 $3 255 000 $21 519 120 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance307 500 $$308K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    912 500 $912 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    880 833 $880 833 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 29
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 791
    Mentions "j'aime": 223
    Fleury is not worth that much, sorry
    hockeyconnor97 a aimé ceci.
    12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 32
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 3,235
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,175
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Fleury is not worth that much, sorry


    I mean, if you think so, I wont disagree. This is a trade Ive seen posted around so I didnt want to be controversial and try to reinvent the wheel
    Eberles_Backcheck a aimé ceci.
    12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 35
    #3
    Meme Enthusiast
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 1,080
    Mentions "j'aime": 229
    I would say that Edmonton would've been in on Flower a week ago but, Holland made it clear this week that he isn't trading a 1st or quality prospects for rentals
    12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 37
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 3,235
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,175
    Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
    I would say that Edmonton would've been in on Flower a week ago but, Holland made it clear this week that he isn't trading a 1st or quality prospects for rentals


    Thats fair. I hope he changes his mind. McDavid and Drai deserve to win for once. Theyre too good to be held down by management refusing to make a splash at the deadline.
    jjkhairaELTE99 a aimé ceci.
    12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 38
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 791
    Mentions "j'aime": 223
    Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
    I would say that Edmonton would've been in on Flower a week ago but, Holland made it clear this week that he isn't trading a 1st or quality prospects for rentals


    Quoting: SlickWilly
    I mean, if you think so, I wont disagree. This is a trade Ive seen posted around so I didnt want to be controversial and try to reinvent the wheel


    jjkhaira is right here. Although, if Holland didn't make those comments, I'd still say its too much. I think the 1st is fair value, and maybe a B prospect like Kemp at the most.
    jjkhairaELTE99 a aimé ceci.
    Voir tout