SalarySwishSalarySwish

no idea what hexy will do, but DAT DEFENSE DOH!

Créé par: bobloblawlawblog
Équipe: 2017-18 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 10 avr. 2017
Publié: 14 avr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Schenn for Vatanen gives Anaheim the chance to not lose him (Vatanen) and protect their forwards (speculating Bieksa DOESN'T get bought out/waive his NTC). Ghost gets a 5yr deal at a reasonable price, sacrificing a little bit of $ for term. i have no idea what they'll give Vecchione. They snag Condon with a pay raise and the potential for playing time. Love me some Raffl, but he's most likely taken if he's exposed. Jordan Weal stays with the promise of playing on the top line, and a "prove-it" pay raise. Cousins re-signs with a chance to earn a pay raise on his next contract. Stoli starts in LHV, but since Neuvirth is so brittle, he'll get called up throughout the season. "Realistic" best-case scenario for SucMac is that he gets sent down to LHV again.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
21 000 000 $
53 850 000 $
31 000 000 $
2685 000 $
2800 000 $
3950 000 $
2650 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 125 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
PHI
VGK
  1. Raffl, Michael
Détails additionnels:
expansion draft selection
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2019
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2020
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2273 000 000 $61 836 667 $1 062 500 $1 562 500 $11 163 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 5
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
3 975 000 $3 975 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 5
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
3 625 000 $3 625 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG, AG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
975 000 $975 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 avr. 2017 à 7 h 31
#1
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,916
Mentions "j'aime": 1,059
Looks like a team that could get the top overall pick.
14 avr. 2017 à 7 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 724
Mentions "j'aime": 100
That logic about the Ducks not losing a Dman is correct, but with the trade, the Ducks will lose a forward...Schenn or Sliverberg, so from the Ducks view the trade makes no sense,
What the Ducks would want in return is someone or two that are not protectable . Vatanen for Konecky and Hagg . Either way the Ducks can do a lot better than just exhanging guys who might be claimed by Vegas.
14 avr. 2017 à 11 h 12
#3
NateElder12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 5,736
Mentions "j'aime": 801
don't think ANA takes that trade. They would lose Vermette in that instance so they'd probably prefer a forward who is exempt that is a center.
14 avr. 2017 à 12 h 14
#4
Kiekenapp
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 494
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: orignalsix
That logic about the Ducks not losing a Dman is correct, but with the trade, the Ducks will lose a forward...Schenn or Sliverberg, so from the Ducks view the trade makes no sense,
What the Ducks would want in return is someone or two that are not protectable . Vatanen for Konecky and Hagg . Either way the Ducks can do a lot better than just exhanging guys who might be claimed by Vegas.


If the Ducks trade Vatanen they will not lose a forward like Silfv or Shenn. They will then protect 7 Forwards and 3 D, with bieksa waiving his NMC
14 avr. 2017 à 13 h 40
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
I'm baffled that Laughton got a raise...and playing time
Voir tout