SalarySwishSalarySwish

Roster Prediction after Preseason Game 1

Créé par: Tyler_A10
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 sept. 2021
Publié: 30 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
My Game Notes:
Gaudette was a beast last night and looks comfortable at wing. Borgstrom was winning faceoffs which means hes more and more likely to become the 4C, more offensive skill than weve seen in our 4th line in a bit. Hagel was amazing as always, Dach was great and is probably a best fit away from Dach and Kane, and Kurashev is looking prime to secure his spot as well. Great to see Toews look healthy and capable once again. The captain is back and thats great news. As for poor performances in the forward core. Connolly and Nylander looked off, might be the last chance for Nylander before he heads to waivers or a trade for a conditional 4th round pick. On Defense, Caleb Jones was awesome, Stillman was fine, but looked good enough in a shutdown role next to Murphy. Kalynuk was slinging pucks everywhere. Beaudin looked off and showed he needs probably one more year and as for Isaak Phillips. I'm happy he got this spotlight, as he looks like a very quality sleeper pick from 2020, but he's just turned 20 and still clearly a few years away, his performance was not ideal, but you dont exactly expect greatness from a player of his draft pedigree and age.


(Note: "Taxi Squad" is just notable roster misses.)
Going to waivers
Connolly
Subban (but probably traded for conditional pick beforehand)
Delia
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 141 672 $452 439 $3 382 500 $15 358 328 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $ (2 375 000 $$2M2 375 000 $$2M)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance307 500 $$308K)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

30 sept. 2021 à 20 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,400
De Haan is better then both Kalynuk and stillman as of now and will be the lineup barring injury.

Guadette and Kurashev should be swapped as Guadette is a RW or C.
30 sept. 2021 à 21 h 36
#2
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,868
Mentions "j'aime": 5,857
Quoting: ChiHawk
De Haan is better than both Kalynuk and Stillman as of now and will be the lineup barring injury.

Gaudette and Kurashev should be swapped as Gaudette are an RW or C.


Honestly, I don't know what people see in Stillman, IMO Jones played way better yesterday. An interesting story by Ben Pope today said that Nylander was out much longer than initially expected with his injury. I know no one wants to hear it with him, but his conditioning as a result of his injury may have been why he looked so rough yesterday. As a noted Nylander supporter, I just wanted to throw that bit of information out there so people know.
30 sept. 2021 à 23 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,400
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Honestly, I don't know what people see in Stillman, IMO Jones played way better yesterday. An interesting story by Ben Pope today said that Nylander was out much longer than initially expected with his injury. I know no one wants to hear it with him, but his conditioning as a result of his injury may have been why he looked so rough yesterday. As a noted Nylander supporter, I just wanted to throw that bit of information out there so people know.


Stillman is a faster version of Zadorov, similar game; a good #6 or #7 guy. Caleb is okay, I agree he played a pretty good game, but historically, he's not good enough for a top 4 role and his style of play isn't great as a 3rd pairing.

Nylander looked like Nylander. This kid, who's work ethic has been questioned over the years, is running out of runway injury or not.
1 oct. 2021 à 9 h 0
#4
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,868
Mentions "j'aime": 5,857
Quoting: ChiHawk
Stillman is a faster version of Zadorov, similar game; a good #6 or #7 guy. Caleb is okay, I agree he played a pretty good game, but historically, he's not good enough for a top 4 role and his style of play isn't great as a 3rd pairing.

Nylander looked like Nylander. This kid, who's work ethic has been questioned over the years, is running out of runway injury or not.


Since I wasn’t a huge fan of Z, maybe that generalizes to Stillman, IMO Jones could work with Murphy on the second pair, but I want to see more before coming to a conclusion. At the very least I think
Jones offered up a better case as to why he should make the opening night lineup than Stillman

I would also say that Nylander didn’t look like much of anything last game, except bad I mean, I agree that even if he’s still working on conditioning he needs to show more to make the team, but I understand why he might be having a hard time. JC said he just recently started skating because of how his injury healed, that has to be pretty rough for a guy coming of a knee surgery.
1 oct. 2021 à 16 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,400
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Since I wasn’t a huge fan of Z, maybe that generalizes to Stillman, IMO Jones could work with Murphy on the second pair, but I want to see more before coming to a conclusion. At the very least I think
Jones offered up a better case as to why he should make the opening night lineup than Stillman

I would also say that Nylander didn’t look like much of anything last game, except bad I mean, I agree that even if he’s still working on conditioning he needs to show more to make the team, but I understand why he might be having a hard time. JC said he just recently started skating because of how his injury healed, that has to be pretty rough for a guy coming of a knee surgery.


lynuk and Caleb are very similar styles; one of them would be good with Murphy but the question is which one. 3rd pairing is going to need De haan with the other in my mind. Stillman being the 7th man when De Haan gets hurt.

Nylander's situation is unfortunate but also worth questioning how much conditioning has he done pre injury and post given his record of not being 100% hockey focused.
Voir tout