SalarySwishSalarySwish

Logical lineup with pieces we have

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 4 août 2021
Publié: 4 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This lineup is based upon best potential for chemistry and not factoring in any more trades. Also, in making this, I have been very defensive of excluding youth in the lineup. Guys like kurashev, Hagel, and beaudin earned their spots in my opinion and this lineup shows that. That means players like Johnson or Connelly won’t be my priority.

My only issue making this lineup was borgstrom. I haven’t the faintest idea what to do with him. I don’t think he’ll amount to much personally, but he’ll be around two guys who can help him a ways, especially hagel’s work rate.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 105 880 $452 439 $2 832 500 $15 394 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

4 août 2021 à 16 h 32
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,834
Modifié 4 août 2021 à 16 h 50
I hear what you're saying. I'd prefer to see

Kubs - Toews - Dach... Dach plays a cylce game like Toews, but is also a playmaker which can feed Kubalik's snipe.
Debrincat - Borgstrom Kane ... I don't think Borgstrom is the given #2C, but I do see shades of this line carrying the center much like the AK72 line did.
Hagel - Strome - TJ ... Strome is a more natural center, but TJ can take the faceoffs if Strome isn't performing well. Both Hagel and TJ are energy guys which helps Strome's more methodical pace.
JK - Gaudetter - PK - This is a rotation in my mind.

I'm good with the Dpairs, but i don't think Stan/JC will keep Beaudin at the NHL level. It's too easy an excuse to put both he and Mitchell in Rockford and allow Jones/Stillman more time. They'll rotate into the NHL as needed.
4 août 2021 à 16 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: exo2769
I hear what you're saying. I'd prefer to see

Kubs - Toews - Dach... Dach plays a cylce game like Toews, but is also a playmaker which can feed Kubalik's snipe.
Debrincat - Borgstrom Kane ... I don't think Borgstrom is the given #2C, but I do see shades of this line carrying the center much like the AK72 line did.
Hagel - Strome - TJ ... Strome is a more natural center, but TJ can take the faceoffs if Strome isn't performing well. Both Hagel and TJ are energy guys which helps Strome's more methodical pace.
JK - Gaudetter - PK - This is a rotation in my mind.

I'm good with the Dpairs, but i don't think Stan/JC will keep Beaudin at the NHL level. It's too easy an excuse to put them both in Rockford and allow Jones/Stillman more time. They'll rotate into the NHL as needed.


Agree with everything you say and that each pairing can be feasible. I am a little skeptical about strome being with TJ and Hagel, but it’s worth a shot. The One part I do disagree with though is the use of kurashev. I don’t believe he should be a fourth liner given how well he played last year. He deserves top 6 minutes with toews or whoever else. I don’t wanna send our prospects the wrong message when we prioritize youth we trade over youth we develop.
4 août 2021 à 17 h 0
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,834
Quoting: HatterTParty
Agree with everything you say and that each pairing can be feasible. I am a little skeptical about strome being with TJ and Hagel, but it’s worth a shot. The One part I do disagree with though is the use of kurashev. I don’t believe he should be a fourth liner given how well he played last year. He deserves top 6 minutes with toews or whoever else. I don’t wanna send our prospects the wrong message when we prioritize youth we trade over youth we develop.


Yeah, I hear ya on that too. I think we kinda are with Jones/Stillman. I just don't want to rush Kurashev into too much. I really like his game. He's fast and strong with the puck. I want to see him get more comfortable/in control with the puck the offensive zone.
4 août 2021 à 17 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Surprised Dach is in the line up…
4 août 2021 à 17 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Modifié 4 août 2021 à 17 h 47
Quoting: Gohawks33
Surprised Dach is in the line up…


Why’s that? Did he get injured again?
Voir tout