SalarySwishSalarySwish

32 in 32

Créé par: ConnorMcHellebucyk
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 4 août 2021
Publié: 4 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
its been a year and a half since i did my 31 in 31. now with seattle, we'll see how this goes.

lines dont matter too much. its more about how the team will finish

zegras makes the team out of camp for sure
drysdale likely needs another year of development but he will definitely get games this year.

verdict: this is not anaheims year, but as soon as next year, the zegras, drysdale, mctavish core begins and the ducks start their rise to the top

prediction: ducks finish 7th in the pacific finishing just ahead of san jose. gibson puts up good numbers and zegras wins the calder. a bright future ahead.

Arizona comes tomorrow
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
1900 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (COL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
traded at deadline to a contending team. i picked colorado because they could use a little help on the wing.
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
i dont see much of a future for him in anaheim
ARI
  1. Steel, Sam [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $52 134 028 $0 $3 200 000 $29 365 972 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

4 août 2021 à 13 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,139
Mentions "j'aime": 5,943
I'm hopeful the Ducks blow it up more than you have here but not a bad start

I don't think they give up on Steel until next season if he still hasn't took that step

I dont see a scenario where Rico is on the team come training camp (As much as I want to keep him)

Lines are a bit off from what I'm expecting to see (Mainly keeping Comtois-Zegras-Terry together)

Comtois-Zegras-Terry (once they started playing together last season they looked great and were our best line)
Steel-Getzlaf-Rakell (Try to get Steel going by moving him to the wing, no room for him up the middle moving forward which you wisely pointed out)
Jones-Lundestrom-Silfverberg (Have Silfy mentor the two young guns, Lundestrom earned a top 3 C spot on this team to me with his play last year)
Milano/Volkov-Grant-Deslauriers (Not much to say here, I expect Milano and Volkov to rotate in the lineup to start the year)

Lindholm-Drysdale (What I'm hoping for, best defender with Drysdale to get used to the NHL game whether it be for a few games or a full season)
Fowler-Shattenkirk (They weren't terrible last year, this pairing can help out with weaker forward lines getting offense moving)
Mahura-Manson (Eakins values playing Manson with our young defenseman, LD3 will likely be a competition between Mahura, Larsson and Guhle)

Obviously not much to say about the goalies.

If Rico isnt moved I feel like Eakins puts him on the 4th line (Rico is one of my favourite players in the league, he has been since he played for my hometown Windsor Spitfires, just trying to be as realistic as I can)

My prediction is the Ducks finish last in the west (assuming some of the vets are moved out), seems like a fun series to do!
TZ11 et ConnorMcHellebucyk a aimé ceci.
4 août 2021 à 13 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,388
Mentions "j'aime": 1,945
"drysdale likely needs another year of development but he will definitely get games this year."

Drysdale will play full-time with the Ducks next year. He played with them full-time after being called up. It wouldn't make sense to send him back to the OHL. (He'd have to because it seems that the agreement with the CHL will be U20 players who played 20+ AHL games can play in the AHL again next season. Drysdale only played 14 games with the Gulls.)
Salzy, Lenny7 et ConnorMcHellebucyk a aimé ceci.
4 août 2021 à 14 h 1
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I think a return on Rakell is really going to depend on how the first couple of months of the season go. I'd be playing him on the wing with Comtois and Zegras for now, trying to squeeze some offence out of him. My hope would be that he could get the Foligno package, or potentially more given the Ducks ability to retain on him.

With Steel, I don't think there's any rush moving him. He's actually been a pretty decent 3C, with decent faceoff and possession stats. The offence obviously hasn't come out yet, and maybe it won't, but I think it's dangerous to move him for little to no return at this point, given how Eakins has pretty much smothered any potential offence with his horrible system.

With Drysdale, I don't disagree at all-He should probably spend some more time in the minors. The NHL recently created an exemption for Jr aged players who played a certain amount of games last year in the AHL to be able to do it again, but Drysdale doesn't meet that number so it'll be interesting to see what happens with him. There's probably not much point putting him back in Jr, so if he can't play in the AHL, the best move is to probably insulate him from the tough matchups by utilizing Manson and Shatty more (though Shatty doesn't offer a ton in those situations).

*Hopefully* the team will extend Lindholm. Manson *could* be used as a trade chip, but the value coming back would have to be an overpay, as again, he'll be needed to insulate Drysdale instead of throwing him to the wolves.

Cheers!
TZ11 et ConnorMcHellebucyk a aimé ceci.
4 août 2021 à 14 h 31
#4
Buljujarvi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,209
Mentions "j'aime": 2,552
Quoting: TZ11
"drysdale likely needs another year of development but he will definitely get games this year."

Drysdale will play full-time with the Ducks next year. He played with them full-time after being called up. It wouldn't make sense to send him back to the OHL. (He'd have to because it seems that the agreement with the CHL will be U20 players who played 20+ AHL games can play in the AHL again next season. Drysdale only played 14 games with the Gulls.)


youre right. i wasnt aware that he wasnt eligible for the AHL. he is certainly too good for the OHL.
Lenny7 et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2021 à 14 h 32
#5
Buljujarvi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,209
Mentions "j'aime": 2,552
Quoting: Lenny7
I think a return on Rakell is really going to depend on how the first couple of months of the season go. I'd be playing him on the wing with Comtois and Zegras for now, trying to squeeze some offence out of him. My hope would be that he could get the Foligno package, or potentially more given the Ducks ability to retain on him.

With Steel, I don't think there's any rush moving him. He's actually been a pretty decent 3C, with decent faceoff and possession stats. The offence obviously hasn't come out yet, and maybe it won't, but I think it's dangerous to move him for little to no return at this point, given how Eakins has pretty much smothered any potential offence with his horrible system.

With Drysdale, I don't disagree at all-He should probably spend some more time in the minors. The NHL recently created an exemption for Jr aged players who played a certain amount of games last year in the AHL to be able to do it again, but Drysdale doesn't meet that number so it'll be interesting to see what happens with him. There's probably not much point putting him back in Jr, so if he can't play in the AHL, the best move is to probably insulate him from the tough matchups by utilizing Manson and Shatty more (though Shatty doesn't offer a ton in those situations).

*Hopefully* the team will extend Lindholm. Manson *could* be used as a trade chip, but the value coming back would have to be an overpay, as again, he'll be needed to insulate Drysdale instead of throwing him to the wolves.

Cheers!


thanks for the input. drysdale is certainly a huge wild card this season.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout