SalarySwishSalarySwish

What do you want for Hertl and Burns

Créé par: The_Architect
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 25 juill. 2021
Publié: 25 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1881 500 000 $67 000 120 $597 561 $1 475 000 $14 499 880 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

25 juill. 2021 à 19 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
My guess 1st, Tuch and Norlinder would be a decent trade. I think some money would need to be retained on Burns though.
The_Architect a aimé ceci.
25 juill. 2021 à 19 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,268
Mentions "j'aime": 2,892
For Hertl alone, I would ask for something comparable to what Duchene got from CBJ a couple trade deadlines ago which was basically a 1st, a decent prospect and another conditional 1st if Duchene resigned. And then add some because you’d be getting Hertl for a full season. So a 1st + reasonably high end prospect would be the foundation.

Contrary to what people on here think, Burns doesn’t have negative value despite his age. But reasonably I’d only expect late 2nd or 3rd rounder back for him.
25 juill. 2021 à 19 h 52
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
For Hertl alone, I would ask for something comparable to what Duchene got from CBJ a couple trade deadlines ago which was basically a 1st, a decent prospect and another conditional 1st if Duchene resigned. And then add some because you’d be getting Hertl for a full season. So a 1st + reasonably high end prospect would be the foundation.

Contrary to what people on here think, Burns doesn’t have negative value despite his age. But reasonably I’d only expect a late 2nd or 3rd rounder back for him.


Hertl might bring back a 1st and a prospect in this market.
As for Burns, with no retention I'd say you are right in the 2nd to 3rd catagory.
If I'm SJS I'm not tripping over my own feet in shipping him out. Horrible move for MTL to want to bring him in.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
25 juill. 2021 à 19 h 59
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,268
Mentions "j'aime": 2,892
Quoting: pharrow
Hertl might bring back a 1st and a prospect in this market.
As for Burns, with no retention I'd say you are right in the 2nd to 3rd catagory.
If I'm SJS I'm not tripping over my own feet in shipping him out. Horrible move for MTL to want to bring him in.


Agreed. I really don’t think that’s an unfair ask for Hertl considering he is a 1C and considering what Philly and Chicago paid for Risto and Jones.
25 juill. 2021 à 20 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,999
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
For Hertl alone, I would ask for something comparable to what Duchene got from CBJ a couple trade deadlines ago which was basically a 1st, a decent prospect and another conditional 1st if Duchene resigned. And then add some because you’d be getting Hertl for a full season. So a 1st + reasonably high end prospect would be the foundation.

Contrary to what people on here think, Burns doesn’t have negative value despite his age. But reasonably I’d only expect late 2nd or 3rd rounder back for him.


IMO it's fair. Would SJ prefer prospects instead of picks?
Voir tout